ON
← Back to feed
Contractor which wrongly cleared saplings in Central Catchment Nature Reserve warned; trees replanted
SG🏛️ Politics2 days ago

Contractor which wrongly cleared saplings in Central Catchment Nature Reserve warned; trees replanted

A contractor involved in maintaining trails at Singapore's Lower Peirce Reservoir Park mistakenly cleared saplings planted as part of the OneMillionTrees greening initiative. The National Parks Board (NParks) investigated and found the error stemmed from a misunderstanding of storage instructions left by a supervisor on overseas leave. NParks replanted 60 new plants in the affected area, which was approximately half the size of a badminton court. The contractor and project supervisor admitted fault and agreed to cover replanting and maintenance costs. NParks issued a 24-month conditional warning, allowing potential legal action if further offenses occur. The incident was reported by a member of the public who shared photos online, prompting NParks to verify the replanted species match those originally planted.

1 reports

The Straits Times logoThe Straits TimesParty-aligned🔒CenterFactual 85Objective 902 days ago
Contractor which wrongly cleared saplings in Central Catchment Nature Reserve warned; trees replanted

A contractor involved in maintaining trails at Singapore's Lower Peirce Reservoir Park mistakenly cleared saplings planted as part of the OneMillionTrees greening initiative. The National Parks Board (NParks) investigated and found the error stemmed from a misunderstanding of storage instructions left by a supervisor on overseas leave. NParks replanted 60 new plants in the affected area, which was approximately half the size of a badminton court. The contractor and project supervisor admitted fault and agreed to cover replanting and maintenance costs. NParks issued a 24-month conditional warning, allowing potential legal action if further offenses occur. The incident was reported by a member of the public who shared photos online, prompting NParks to verify the replanted species match those originally planted.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual account of an administrative error involving a contractor and the National Parks Board. It does not take a clear ideological stance, nor does it emphasize any particular political agenda. The focus remains on the procedural and regulatory response to the incident, with

Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 90): Factuality is high as the article accurately reports the incident, the response from NParks, and the consequences for the contractor. It provides specific details like dates, locations, and quotes from officials. Objectivity is strong as the article presents the situation neutrally, without apparent

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories