The Nova Gorica Cultural Centre is looking for a new director - Mija Lorbek has also responded

RTV Slovenija (MMC)State / PublicCenterFactual 95Objective 85yesterday

The Cultural Center of Nova Gorica is seeking a new director after Andrej Šušmelj resigned from his position due to ongoing tensions between the center and the local municipality, Mestna Občina Nova Gorica (MONG). Šušmelj cited unsustainable relationships and parallel management of the cultural institution as reasons for his resignation. The interim director, Žan Bokan, will serve until a new director is appointed. The municipal council has announced a public tender for the role, requiring candidates to submit detailed applications including a biography, development plan for the institution, proof of qualifications, and language skills. The selected candidate will hold the position for five years. Additionally, the Cultural Center will now manage the legacy of the European Capital of Culture (EPK) project. A civic initiative has called for a referendum on the decision to establish the Cultural Center as a public institution, submitting 251 signatures to initiate the process.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about the appointment process for the director of the Cultural Center and mentions a civic initiative calling for a referendum. It does not exhibit clear bias in framing, language, or sourcing, providing balanced coverage of the situation without overtly slan

Why factuality (95): The article provides specific details such as the resignation of Andrej Šušmelj, his stated reasons for leaving, and the current interim director Žan Bokan. It also mentions the timeline for the new director search and the process by which MONG will appoint the next director. These facts align close

Why objectivity (85): The article presents the situation in a largely neutral manner, reporting events and statements from involved parties without overt bias. However, it includes direct quotes from individuals, which may introduce subtle subjectivity depending on the speaker’s perspective.

Primorske noviceIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 802 days ago

The Cultural Center of Nova Gorica is seeking a new director after its previous director, Andrej Šušmelj, resigned less than a year into his tenure. The interim director, Žan Bokan, has confirmed he will not apply for the position. The city council wants to appoint a new director before the autumn local elections because the Cultural Center will soon take over the long-term management of the heritage of the European Capital of Culture, GO! 2025. Mayor Samo Turel emphasized the importance of starting the selection process immediately to ensure fairness for potential candidates. Rumors suggested that Mija Lorbek, the current director of the GO! 2025 organization, might be interested in the role, but she denied any intention to apply. She stated that her current responsibilities have been extended and that she intends to complete them professionally. The situation around the Cultural Center has been contentious since early last year, particularly due to changes in the requirements for the director’s appointment, which critics claimed were tailored to a specific candidate. Two candidates applied—Šušmelj and Simona Moličnik—but the city council ultimately appointed Šušmelj, who later辞职,

Bias read (Center): The article provides a balanced overview of the situation at the Cultural Center of Nova Gorica, including the resignation of the former director, the interim leadership, the search for a new director, and the controversy surrounding the appointment process. It includes perspectives from both themay

Why factuality (90): This article accurately reports the resignation of Andrej Šušmelj, the interim leadership under Žan Bokan, and the upcoming selection process for a new director. It adds important context regarding the potential new responsibilities of the Cultural House related to the European Capital of Culture GO

Why objectivity (80): While the article remains mostly objective, it does include commentary from Mayor Samo Turel, which introduces a slight subjective angle. Additionally, the inclusion of Mija Lorbek’s social media response adds a personal touch that slightly affects neutrality.

DnevnikIndependent🔒CenterFactual 85Objective 809 days ago

The article discusses the outcome of a referendum held in Ljubljana on a parking regulation, which failed to meet the required rejection threshold due to low voter turnout. Mayor Zoran Janković expressed gratitude to both those who participated and those who did not. He emphasized that the law sets a rejection quota that was not met, thus ending the matter. The article notes that a representative of the Civic Initiative for Ljubljana (CILJ), Borut Hočevar, called for the municipality to re-introduce the revised parking ordinance, stating it was his personal opinion. The mayor criticized this call, suggesting it could be interpreted as a misuse of the referendum result. Janković also claimed the referendum was effectively against him, noting that many voters were unaware of what they were voting on and that support came from various initiatives opposed to his leadership.

Bias read (Center): While the article covers a politically sensitive issue involving local governance and public policy, the framing remains balanced. It presents both the mayor’s stance and the opposition’s arguments without overtly favoring either side. The tone is objective, focusing on the procedural outcome and各方的

Why factuality (85): This article provides accurate information about the referendum outcome and Janković’s reaction, including his acknowledgment of the referendum’s failure due to insufficient turnout. It aligns with the primary source regarding the withdrawal of the ordinance.

Why objectivity (80): The article maintains an objective tone, reporting facts without strong emotional language. However, it subtly implies that the referendum was politically motivated, which might introduce slight bias.

RTV Slovenija (MMC)State / PublicProgressiveFactual 80Objective 756 days ago

The article discusses a local controversy in Piran, Slovenia, regarding the potential sale of seven plots of land in the Fiesa area by the municipal council. The Civil Initiative Piran Pirano is collecting signatures to initiate a referendum against the sale, arguing that these lands contain some of the best gardens in the municipality and should remain in public ownership. The municipal council has approved the sale as part of a broader strategy to sell non-critical assets while retaining essential land for development. The decision was passed with 11 votes in favor, 8 against, and 4 abstentions. Critics argue that the sale could lead to the loss of green spaces and that the initiative aims to prevent further urbanization of the area. Some council members suggest that the sale might have been influenced by legal proceedings or pressure from specific interests.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the opposition to the land sale as a civic duty and highlights concerns about the loss of public green space and community heritage. It emphasizes the grassroots effort led by the Civil Initiative Piran Pirano, which is portrayed as a democratic response to perceived governmental罔

Why factuality (80): The article discusses the proposed sale of land in Fiesa by the Municipality of Piran and the initiative by 'Civilna Iniciativa Piran Pirano' to collect signatures for a referendum. While it provides relevant background on the decision-making process and the valuation of the land, it lacks specific

Why objectivity (75): The article contains more subjective language, particularly in the quotes from Meira Hot, who criticizes the decision. This introduces an opinionated tone rather than strictly presenting the facts. The overall narrative leans toward highlighting opposition to the land sales.

Svet24IndependentProgressive3 hr. ago

The article reports on a dispute over the Fieso area, where residents of Piran have collected three times more signatures for a referendum compared to their opponents. The headline suggests a significant grassroots effort by Piran residents to push for a decision on the issue through a popular vote. The focus appears to be on the local community's initiative and the potential implications of this referendum for regional governance or territorial rights.

Bias read (Progressive): The article emphasizes the success of the Piran residents' petitioning efforts, which could be interpreted as supporting local autonomy or opposition to external control. The framing highlights the strength of the local movement, potentially aligning with leftist values of community empowerment and⺠

RTV Slovenija (MMC)State / PublicProgressive3 hr. ago

A civil initiative in Piran has collected 921 signatures supporting a referendum on the sale of municipal land in Fiesi, which they submitted to the local municipality. The initiative opposes the proposed sale, arguing that the decision by the Piran municipal council to sell the land was controversial and lacked proper public involvement. They emphasize that democratic processes require public participation in decisions regarding spatial planning and land management. The initiative highlights concerns over the exclusion of citizens from decision-making and criticizes the current approach as autocratic. The group aims to ensure transparency and inclusivity in local governance.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue as a democratic deficit, criticizing the exclusion of public input in local governance and describing the current approach as 'autocratic.' It emphasizes the need for inclusive, participatory democracy and positions the civil initiative as defending democratic principles

Siol.netState / PublicProgressive4 hr. ago

A grassroots initiative in Piran has collected 921 signatures supporting a referendum on the sale of municipal land in Fiesi, which was submitted to the Piran town hall on Wednesday. The initiative, represented by Davorin Petaros, claims that the public should decide on spatial planning decisions, criticizing the current autocratic leadership style of the municipality and state. Petaros emphasized that the Spatial Planning Act mandates public involvement in development strategies and management, arguing that authorities ignore this principle and claim citizens are incapable of making informed democratic decisions. He noted that collecting signatures has proven otherwise. The group initially aimed to gather 300 signatures but has already exceeded this target threefold, with more signatures still coming in. They oppose the sale of municipal lands in Fiesi, calling the decision by the Piran Municipal Council controversial.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the initiative as a legitimate democratic effort against perceived authoritarian governance, emphasizing public participation and criticism of local authority. It portrays the opposition to land sales as a civic duty and highlights the discrepancy between official claims of public

Primorske noviceIndependentProgressive9 hr. ago

Civilna iniciativa Piran Pirano in občinski svetnik Davorin Petaros so včeraj predali 921 podpisov podpore za razpis referenduma o prodaji občinskih zemljišč v Fiesi. Podpisovanje je bilo posledica sklepa piranskega občinskega sveta, ki je na zadnjem seju odobril predhodno soglasje za prodajo sedmih parcel v Fiesi. Občinski svetnik je izrazil zadovoljenje zaradi velike podpore javnosti, kar je pokazalo, da je nasprotovanje proti prodaji zemljišč široko razširjeno. Predstavniki iniciative menijo, da bo referendum pokazal javno mnenje o tem sklepku.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the initiative as a grassroots effort representing public opinion against the local council's decision to sell land in Fiesi. The emphasis on widespread public support and the portrayal of the council's decision as controversial aligns with a left-leaning perspective, highlighting