ON
← Back to feed
Change in transgender law cannot take away rights already given, Supreme Court tells Centre
India🏛️ PoliticsCenter5 hr. ago

Change in transgender law cannot take away rights already given, Supreme Court tells Centre

The Supreme Court of India addressed concerns raised by transgender activists and community members regarding a proposed change in legislation affecting transgender rights. The court emphasized that any new law would not retroactively invalidate existing 'transgender cards' issued under prior legislation. These cards are crucial for establishing legal identity and access to services. Activists argue that the 2026 Amendment Act grants excessive power to the state to determine gender identity, contradicting a landmark 2014 NALSA judgment that affirmed the right to self-identify as transgender. The court acknowledged these concerns and suggested that if the legislative intent had been to eliminate transgender cards, a clear amendment would have been included in the 2026 statute.

1 reports

The Hindu logoThe HinduIndependentCenter5 hr. ago
Change in transgender law cannot take away rights already given, Supreme Court tells Centre

The Supreme Court of India addressed concerns raised by transgender activists and community members regarding a proposed change in legislation affecting transgender rights. The court emphasized that any new law would not retroactively invalidate existing 'transgender cards' issued under prior legislation. These cards are crucial for establishing legal identity and access to services. Activists argue that the 2026 Amendment Act grants excessive power to the state to determine gender identity, contradicting a landmark 2014 NALSA judgment that affirmed the right to self-identify as transgender. The court acknowledged these concerns and suggested that if the legislative intent had been to eliminate transgender cards, a clear amendment would have been included in the 2026 statute.

Bias read (Center): The article presents both the concerns of the petitioners and the responses from the Supreme Court justices without overtly favoring either side. It includes direct quotes from both parties involved and does not employ biased language or selective sourcing.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories