CLCecilia Pérez, presidenta de Azul Azul (Universidad de Chile), negó haber recibido instrucciones de Victoriano Cerda en las decisiones del club, respondiendo a acusaciones surgidas de una declaración de Alfredo Harz ante la Fiscalía sobre el caso Sartor. Pérez rechazó cualquier intervención de Cerda en el club durante su mandato como vicepresidenta o presidenta, afirmando que nunca hubo contacto directo o telefónico. Además, defendió públicamente a Michael Clark, quien enfrenta una investigación relacionada con la adquisición del control de la universidad, destacando su confianza personal en él. Pérez subrayó su compromiso con principios personales, citando la actitud de Sebastián Piñera durante una campaña electoral.
Bias read (Center): The article presents Cecilia Pérez’s denial of any involvement by Victoriano Cerda in her decisions at the university club, which is a political issue related to governance and accountability. The framing remains neutral, presenting Pérez’s statements without overtly favoring either side. While the
Why factuality (75): The article reports on Cecilia Pérez’s comments regarding Victoriano Cerda’s alleged involvement in university decisions, citing a statement from Alfredo Harz before the Prosecutor's Office. It references the Sartor case and mentions financial ties between Marinvest SpA and Cerda. While no primary s
Why objectivity (68): The tone is somewhat defensive when reporting Pérez’s statements, particularly in her emphasis on her professional role as an attorney. There is a slight editorial tilt in highlighting her denial of Cerda’s influence, but overall the piece remains focused on quoting Pérez rather than inserting stron
