ON
← Back to feed
CBI judge rejects Nirav Modi’s sister’s plea, says accused can’t dictate probe
India🏛️ PoliticsCenter6 days ago

CBI judge rejects Nirav Modi’s sister’s plea, says accused can’t dictate probe

A Mumbai court has rejected Purvi Modi, the sister of fugitive diamantaire Nirav Modi, from appearing before the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) via video conference. The court emphasized that her physical presence was required for detailed questioning and examination of extensive documentation related to the case. Purvi, listed as accused number 31 in the CBI's charge sheet, had previously sought to become an approver in the case, similar to her husband, Maiank Mehta. The court noted that she had not responded to a notice issued by the investigating officer in June 2022, indicating a lack of cooperation. The CBI argued that Purvi was a beneficiary of the alleged fraud and had not assisted the investigation, thus requiring her to be questioned in person.

A 90-year-old retired district judge in Jaipur, Rajasthan, was allegedly subjected to a “digital arrest” and defrauded of approximately ₹2.5 crore by individuals impersonating Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) and Reserve Bank of India (RBI) officials, according to police reports. The incident unfolded between late July and early August, culminating in the victim contacting his nephew to report the fraud after noticing discrepancies during a bank transaction. Ganpat Singh Bhandari, the ex-judge, reportedly received a WhatsApp video call on July 28 from an unknown number. The caller, dressed in a police uniform, identified himself as a CBI officer stationed in Mumbai. He informed Bhandari that a ₹50-crore hawala transaction had been detected in Mumbai, with ₹40 lakh of the proceeds allegedly deposited into Bhandari’s State Bank of India (SBI) account. The caller then threatened to arrest Bhandari unless he cooperated with the investigation, warning that failure to comply could result in legal consequences for both him and a family member. Under duress, Bhandari was allegedly pressured to transfer funds to multiple bank accounts. The fraudsters maintained constant communication with him through video calls, alternating between posing as CBI officers and RBI managers. They allegedly instructed Bhandari to delete all chat records and call logs and discouraged him from informing anyone about the situation. Over several days, Bhandari complied with their demands, transferring approximately ₹2.5 crore to the specified accounts between August 3 and August 10. When Bhandari attempted to make a deposit at SBI’s Johri Bazaar branch on Wednesday, the bank manager became suspicious of the unusual transaction. After questioning him and learning the context, the manager halted the transfer and advised Bhandari that the activity appeared to be part of a cyber fraud. This prompted Bhandari to contact his nephew, Ravindra Singh Mohanaut, who then filed a formal complaint with the Jyoti Nagar police station. Police officers confirmed that they received the complaint on Wednesday and recorded Bhandari’s statement. A station house officer, Gunjan Verma, stated that the authorities managed to freeze around ₹14 lakh from the fraudulent transfers. They are currently investigating the remaining amount to determine how the funds were moved and subsequently withdrawn. The police are also scrutinizing the bank accounts involved in the transactions in an effort to identify the perpetrators behind the alleged cyber fraud. Meanwhile, a separate legal matter involving Nirav Modi, a fugitive diamond merchant, highlights the broader issue of digital fraud and the challenges faced by law enforcement in such cases. A Mumbai court recently denied a request by Purvi Modi, Nirav’s sister, to participate in a CBI investigation via video conference. The court emphasized that physical presence was essential for thorough questioning, particularly given the complexity of the case involving extensive documentation and financial records. Nirav Modi, along with his uncle Mehul Choksi, is accused of orchestrating a massive ₹13,850 crore fraud at Punjab National Bank (PNB). The scandal, revealed in 2018, involved unauthorized letters of undertaking (LoUs) issued by PNB officials, enabling the duo to secure overseas loans without proper collateral. The total loss to PNB was estimated at ₹6,498 crore, and the case remains ongoing as Modi continues to fight extradition from the United Kingdom.

2 reports

Hindustan Times logoHindustan TimesIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 8011 days ago
CBI judge rejects Nirav Modi’s sister’s plea, says accused can’t dictate probe

A Mumbai court has rejected Purvi Modi, the sister of fugitive diamantaire Nirav Modi, from appearing before the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) via video conference. The court emphasized that her physical presence was required for detailed questioning and examination of extensive documentation related to the case. Purvi, listed as accused number 31 in the CBI's charge sheet, had previously sought to become an approver in the case, similar to her husband, Maiank Mehta. The court noted that she had not responded to a notice issued by the investigating officer in June 2022, indicating a lack of cooperation. The CBI argued that Purvi was a beneficiary of the alleged fraud and had not assisted the investigation, thus requiring her to be questioned in person.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual account of legal proceedings involving a significant financial fraud case. It does not exhibit overtly biased language, one-sided sourcing, or omissions that would indicate a clear ideological lean. The report focuses on the legal arguments presented by both the CBI (f

Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports the court's rejection of Purvi Modi's plea, citing legal grounds related to the necessity of her physical presence for detailed questioning. It provides context about her status as an accused and references the CBI's opposition. While it does not include a primary sour

Why objectivity (80): The article presents the facts in a neutral manner, reporting both sides of the argument (Purvi's request and the CBI's opposition). However, there is a slight editorial tilt towards the CBI's position, as it emphasizes the court's agreement with the agency without explicitly noting any potential bi

The Print logoThe PrintIndependentCenterFactual 50Objective 606 days ago
CBI files charge sheet in Twisha case

The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) has filed a charge sheet in the Twisha case, marking a significant legal development in the ongoing investigation. The case involves allegations against individuals associated with prominent political figures, though specific details remain undisclosed in the brief report. The filing indicates that formal charges have been prepared and submitted to the court, which could lead to further legal proceedings. This development highlights the continued scrutiny of political figures by investigative agencies.

Bias read (Center): The article reports a procedural legal action without overtly favoring any political side. It presents the fact that the CBI has filed a charge sheet, but does not provide commentary on the merits of the case or the political implications, maintaining a neutral tone.

Why factuality (50): The article reports that the CBI has filed a charge sheet in the Twisha case, but no primary source document is available for verification. Factuality is limited due to lack of direct evidence, though it aligns with potential cross-source consensus if other media outlets also report the same action.

Why objectivity (60): The article presents the information neutrally, stating only that the CBI has filed a charge sheet. There is no evident bias or emotional language, though the brevity of the report may suggest a lack of depth.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories