ON
← Back to feed
Can we de-extinct the moa and more importantly, should we?
NZ🏛️ PoliticsCenter17 hr. ago

Can we de-extinct the moa and more importantly, should we?

RNZ reports on Colossal Biosciences' efforts to de-extinct the moa, a large flightless bird native to New Zealand, through genetic research. The company recently announced the hatching of 26 artificial eggs as part of its 'foundational step' toward resurrecting extinct bird species. While Colossal Biosciences describes this as a major breakthrough, some scientists criticize the project, arguing that resources should be directed toward protecting currently endangered species rather than reviving extinct ones. The ethical implications of de-extinction are explored, particularly in relation to the cultural significance of the moa in Māori tradition, where it is considered a taonga (treasure). The article also mentions other species on Colossal Biosciences' de-extinction list, such as the woolly mammoth, thylacine, and dodo, and highlights the potential scientific insights into prehistoric ecosystems.

1 reports

RNZ (Radio New Zealand) logoRNZ (Radio New Zealand)State / PublicCenter17 hr. ago
Can we de-extinct the moa and more importantly, should we?

RNZ reports on Colossal Biosciences' efforts to de-extinct the moa, a large flightless bird native to New Zealand, through genetic research. The company recently announced the hatching of 26 artificial eggs as part of its 'foundational step' toward resurrecting extinct bird species. While Colossal Biosciences describes this as a major breakthrough, some scientists criticize the project, arguing that resources should be directed toward protecting currently endangered species rather than reviving extinct ones. The ethical implications of de-extinction are explored, particularly in relation to the cultural significance of the moa in Māori tradition, where it is considered a taonga (treasure). The article also mentions other species on Colossal Biosciences' de-extinction list, such as the woolly mammoth, thylacine, and dodo, and highlights the potential scientific insights into prehistoric ecosystems.

Bias read (Center): The article presents both perspectives, support from Colossal Biosciences and criticism from scientists, without overtly favoring one side. It discusses ethical concerns and includes voices from different backgrounds, including Māori researchers, but does not take a clear stance on whether de-extincti

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories