ON
← Back to feed
Cadem: 75% evaluate the Judicial Power negatively and 81% believe that it is influenced by the most powerful
CL🏛️ PoliticsCenter4 hr. ago

Cadem: 75% evaluate the Judicial Power negatively and 81% believe that it is influenced by the most powerful

According to the Cadem survey conducted in late August, 75% of Chileans rate the Judiciary negatively on a scale of 1 to 7, with only 7% giving it high marks. This represents a significant increase from 66% in August 2024. The survey highlights widespread distrust in the justice system, with 83% believing it does not inspire confidence, 82% thinking it fails to ensure equality before the law, and 79% doubting its clarity and transparency. Additionally, 81% believe the judiciary is influenced by powerful groups, up from 33% in 2024. Most respondents hold judges primarily responsible for the system’s shortcomings, with 67% blaming them compared to 49% in 2024. Public perception of the Cancerbero prison reform plan has declined, with fewer people seeing it as meaningful change and more viewing it as mere publicity.

1 reports

La Tercera logoLa TerceraIndependent🔒Center4 hr. ago
Cadem: 75% evaluate the Judicial Power negatively and 81% believe that it is influenced by the most powerful

According to the Cadem survey conducted in late August, 75% of Chileans rate the Judiciary negatively on a scale of 1 to 7, with only 7% giving it high marks. This represents a significant increase from 66% in August 2024. The survey highlights widespread distrust in the justice system, with 83% believing it does not inspire confidence, 82% thinking it fails to ensure equality before the law, and 79% doubting its clarity and transparency. Additionally, 81% believe the judiciary is influenced by powerful groups, up from 33% in 2024. Most respondents hold judges primarily responsible for the system’s shortcomings, with 67% blaming them compared to 49% in 2024. Public perception of the Cancerbero prison reform plan has declined, with fewer people seeing it as meaningful change and more viewing it as mere publicity.

Bias read (Center): The article presents statistical data from a public opinion survey without overtly favoring any side. It reports findings objectively, showing declining trust in the judiciary but without editorializing or emphasizing particular political perspectives. The framing remains neutral, focusing on the调查的

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories