The situation in Gaza has undergone a significant shift, marked by a growing loss of influence for Hamas and the gradual implementation of a complex international effort aimed at stabilizing the territory. According to a confidential source speaking to The Jerusalem Post, Hamas no longer holds the dominant position it once did in Gaza. This change comes as part of broader international initiatives led by the US-backed Board of Peace, which has taken on the responsibility of managing the post-war transition in the region. The source emphasized that Hamas will not be allowed to exercise veto power over the progress being made, signaling a fundamental departure from previous dynamics where the militant group played a central role in shaping decisions affecting the enclave.
The Board of Peace, established in early 2026, has been working on multiple fronts to address the challenges facing Gaza. These include efforts to improve security conditions and revitalize the local economy. Recent reports indicate that the organization has made tangible strides, such as the deployment of the International Stabilization Force (ISF), which includes contributions from countries like Kosovo. The ISF is intended to assist in restoring stability and facilitating humanitarian aid. A visit by Kosovo’s ambassador to Israel, Ines Demiri, to a base near the Gaza border highlighted the international collaboration underway. She noted the significance of the ISF’s presence and the commitment of participating nations to peace and security.
Despite these developments, the path to lasting peace remains fraught with obstacles. Hamas continues to resist disarming, arguing that Israel must first comply with the terms of the October 2025 ceasefire agreement. This stance has stalled critical discussions on reducing the group’s military capabilities, which many analysts believe is essential for long-term stability in Gaza. Meanwhile, the civilian population remains trapped in a precarious situation, with approximately 40% of the territory still under Hamas control. Over two million residents continue to live under the shadow of the militant group, often confined to makeshift shelters due to ongoing restrictions imposed by Israeli authorities.
The political landscape surrounding the Gaza crisis has also evolved significantly. The Trump administration’s successful negotiation of a ceasefire and hostage release deal in late 2025 laid the groundwork for the current governance structure. However, the focus has shifted as regional tensions with Iran have intensified, drawing global attention away from Gaza. Despite this, the Board of Peace has persisted, albeit at a slower pace. Its first major gathering occurred in February 2026, marking the beginning of formalized coordination among international stakeholders. Yet, progress has been uneven, with many of the organization’s initiatives stalling due to logistical and political barriers.
One of the most contentious aspects of the Board of Peace’s mission is the challenge posed by Hamas’s continued resistance to disarmament. The National Committee for the Administration of Gaza (NCAG), a sub-panel tasked with replacing Hamas in governance, has yet to enter the territory, hindered by both Hamas’s refusal to relinquish control and Israeli restrictions on foreign access. This impasse has left the civilian population without effective governance structures, exacerbating existing hardships. Reports suggest that the NCAG has spent considerable time in Cairo, preparing plans and engaging with diplomats, but has not yet managed to establish a physical presence in Gaza.
As the situation evolves, the upcoming meeting in Cyprus represents a crucial step in the Board of Peace’s efforts to recalibrate its strategy. While some participants have expressed concern about the optics of conducting high-level negotiations in a luxury setting amidst widespread suffering, others argue that such gatherings are necessary for maintaining momentum. The meeting is expected to bring together representatives from various bodies within the Board of Peace, including the Palestinian technocrats and the Office of the High Representative, to align objectives and reassess progress. This renewed focus underscores the complexity of the task ahead, as the international community grapples with the dual challenge of addressing immediate humanitarian needs while laying the foundation for sustainable peace in Gaza.
3 reports
The Times of IsraelIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 7513 days ago Board of Peace members to ‘recalibrate’ at Cyprus resort after rocky first six monthsThe Board of Peace, a US-led international panel managing postwar efforts in Gaza, is convening in Cyprus to reassess its progress after six months of limited success. The meeting includes representatives from the Board of Peace, the Palestinian technocratic committee aiming to replace Hamas in Gaza governance, and the Office of the High Representative. Despite initial international backing and some cooperation from Israel and Hamas, the initiative has stalled due to shifting global focus to Iran-related issues and ongoing disputes over Hamas's disarmament. Gaza remains in crisis, with many residents still living in makeshift shelters due to restricted humanitarian aid and unresolved conflicts. A recent donor conference pledged $17 billion but has seen minimal funding delivery, partly due to Gulf states' strategic priorities. Meanwhile, the Palestinian technocratic committee has remained in Cairo, unable to enter Gaza due to Hamas's resistance and Israeli restrictions.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced overview of the situation in Gaza, highlighting challenges faced by the Board of Peace without overtly favoring any side. It mentions perspectives from multiple stakeholders, including Arab diplomats, Palestinian officials, and references to both Israeli and Hamas st站
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 75): Factuality is high as the article accurately reports on the Board of Peace meeting and the challenges faced by the initiative. Objectivity is somewhat lower due to the inclusion of quotes from unnamed sources that present a particular perspective on the situation in Gaza.
The Jerusalem PostIndependentConservativeFactual 80Objective 7018 days ago Hamas doesn’t call the shots in Gaza anymore, source tells 'Post' - analysisA source close to the diplomatic efforts told The Jerusalem Post that Hamas no longer has control over Gaza and cannot veto decisions made by the US-backed Board of Peace. The Board of Peace is advancing multiple initiatives related to security and economic development in Gaza. It remains unclear if Hamas will comply with demands to disarm, but the source emphasized that Hamas does not hold decision-making power in Gaza anymore. Recent developments include the establishment of a Life Support Area Endurance on the Gazan border, described as a critical location for the International Stabilizaton
Bias read (Conservative): The article frames Hamas as losing influence in Gaza and presents the actions of the US-backed Board of Peace as positive developments without providing counterpoints or alternative perspectives. The emphasis on Hamas’s diminished role and the portrayal of the Board of Peace as effective suggest a倾向
Why these scores (Factual 80 · Objective 70): Factuality is strong with specific details about the Board of Peace's activities and statements from a source. Objectivity is slightly lower due to the emphasis on Hamas losing control and the potential implications, which may favor a particular narrative.
The Times of IsraelIndependentCenterFactual 60Objective 5022 days ago As the missiles fly, then stop - Sponsored ContentThe article raises a question about Israeli public perception of safety following military actions against Hamas and Hezbollah, despite claims of having degraded their capabilities.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a question without taking a stance or providing analysis that would indicate a particular ideological leaning. It does not include commentary or framing that suggests a political bias.
Why these scores (Factual 60 · Objective 50): Factuality is lower as the article appears to be promotional content for a podcast rather than a news report. Objectivity is poor as it lacks neutrality and presents a biased question about Israeli safety without providing balanced context.
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
Become a Supporter