Former Chief of the General Staff: "Kundid doesn't answer only to the president.
Former Chief of the General Staff of the Croatian Armed Forces, Josip Lucić, stated that current Chief of the General Staff, General Tihomir Kundid, is not solely accountable to the President of Croatia but also to the Government, the Minister of Defense, and the Croatian Parliament. Lucić emphasized that Kundid was appointed by the President based on a proposal from the Government with the approval of the Parliament, meaning his actions must align with legal frameworks and institutional oversight. The President, Zoran Milanović, has reiterated his decision that members of the Croatian military will not participate in a military parade in Paris on July 14th and ordered Kundid to carry out this directive. However, Lucić warned that if Kundid follows the President’s order, which he claims contradicts the Law on Defense, Kundid could face legal sanctions. He noted that the law takes precedence over both the President and the Chief of the General Staff, and that previous Presidents, including Stjepan Mesić, had respected these legal boundaries. Lucić suggested Kundid has two options: either comply with the President’s order and risk legal consequences or refuse and potentially face re-
After weeks of relative calm, tensions between Croatia's President Zoran Milanović and Prime Minister Andrej Plenković have resurfaced with renewed intensity, centered around a dispute over whether members of the Croatian Armed Forces should participate in a military parade in Paris. The conflict has escalated into a constitutional and legal battle, raising concerns about the separation of powers and the rule of law within the country’s political framework. The situation began when the government, under pressure from French President Emmanuel Macron, decided to send a contingent of honor guard troops to the annual Bastille Day military parade in Paris. This decision was made by the Ministry of Defense, led by Minister Ivan Anušić, who argued that such ceremonial participation falls under the ministry’s jurisdiction. However, President Milanović, as the head of state and supreme commander of the armed forces, issued a directive stating that the armed forces would not take part in the event without his approval. His reasoning was based on the belief that the parade could be used to promote the so-called "coalition of wills," which he claimed undermined national interests. This disagreement quickly turned into a public confrontation. Milanović accused Plenković of undermining the authority of the presidency and violating the constitution. In response, Plenković criticized Milanović for acting outside the bounds of the law, arguing that the decision to send troops to the parade was within the minister’s authority and that the president had no right to override this. The tension reached its peak when the prime minister demanded that General Tihomir Kundid, the Chief of the General Staff of the Armed Forces, either comply with the president’s order or resign. Kundid, however, found himself caught between two powerful figures. He reportedly refused to follow Milanović’s orders, citing the legal provisions of the Defence Act, which grant the minister of defense the authority to deploy up to 30 soldiers for ceremonial purposes. This refusal sparked further accusations from both sides, with Milanović claiming that Kundid was being influenced by Plenković, while Plenković accused Milanović of overstepping his constitutional role. As the conflict intensified, the issue moved from the executive branch to the legislative sphere. Members of parliament, including representatives from the ruling party and opposition groups, debated the legality of the president’s actions. Some lawmakers, including Speaker of the Parliament Gordan Jandroković, warned that the situation posed a serious threat to the rule of law and the stability of the state. They emphasized that neither the president nor the chief of staff could act above the law, especially in matters related to national defense. Legal experts and former officials weighed in on the matter, highlighting the constitutional ambiguity surrounding the division of power between the president and the government. Former Chief of the General Staff Josip Lucić noted that while the president holds ultimate command, the chief of staff must also adhere to the laws governing the armed forces. He suggested that Kundid’s refusal to obey the president’s order could lead to disciplinary action, but he also warned that if Kundid violated the law, he would face even greater consequences. Meanwhile, the public has been drawn into the debate, with citizens expressing strong opinions on both sides. Some support Milanović’s stance, arguing that the president, elected by the people, has the right to protect national interests. Others back Plenković, emphasizing the importance of respecting the legal framework and maintaining good relations with European partners. The controversy has also raised questions about the effectiveness of Croatia’s democratic institutions and the potential for further instability if the conflict remains unresolved. In light of these developments, there are growing calls for a resolution that respects the rule of law while preserving the integrity of the nation’s leadership structures. Legal scholars suggest that the situation highlights the need for clearer constitutional guidelines regarding the roles of the president and the government in matters of national defense. Meanwhile, political analysts warn that continued clashes between the two leaders could erode public trust in the government and weaken Croatia’s position within the broader European community. As the situation continues to evolve, all parties remain cautious. While some advocate for dialogue and compromise, others insist on firm positions, fearing that any concession might set a dangerous precedent. With the upcoming parliamentary sessions and potential elections looming, the outcome of this crisis could have far-reaching implications for Croatia’s political future. For now, the nation watches closely, hoping that the conflict can be resolved in a manner that upholds the principles of democracy and the rule of law.
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.
The article reports on tensions between Croatian President Zoran Milanović and Prime Minister Andrej Plenković over Croatia's participation in France's annual military parade on July 14th, commemorating the French National Day. The parade, held on the Champs-Élysées since 1880, attracts millions of viewers worldwide and involves military units from allied nations. France has announced an increased military focus this year, highlighting NATO operations in Eastern Europe and support for Ukraine. Croatia was invited to participate, but Milanović reportedly opposes the involvement of Croatian troops. The event is expected to feature two Mirage 2000 fighter jets, one painted in Ukrainian colors, and representatives from countries in the 'Coalition of Willing' initiative.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the dispute around Croatia's participation in the military parade as a matter of national sovereignty and foreign policy alignment. It emphasizes the strategic implications of Croatia's involvement, suggesting that Milanović's opposition reflects concerns about Croatia's role in a
Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 80): Detailed account of the military parade and political conflict, accurately reflects cross-source consensus. Presents facts neutrally, though slightly leans towards the significance of the event.
tportalIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 8011 days ago
The Croatian Prime Minister Andrej Plenković confirmed that Croatia would send 21 members of the Honorary Protection Unit to participate in France's military parade commemorating the Storming of the Bastille on July 14. However, President Zoran Milanović opposed this decision, stating that Croatian soldiers would not attend the event. The parade, held annually on the Champs-Élysées in Paris since 1880, includes participation from foreign military units and is attended by high-ranking officials from various countries. This year's parade emphasizes support for Ukraine, featuring French Mirage 2000 fighter jets, one painted in Ukrainian colors, and representatives from the 'Coalition of Willing' nations. France invited Croatia to participate due to its involvement in the Coalition, though Croatia's contribution is primarily political and civilian rather than military.
Bias read (Center): The article presents both the Croatian government's position and the president's opposition without overtly favoring either side. It provides factual information about the parade and its significance while quoting both officials involved. There is no evident bias toward one perspective over another.
Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 80): Clear and detailed explanation of the military parade and political disagreement, factually consistent with other sources. Maintains neutrality and balance in reporting.
N1 HrvatskaIndependentCenterFactual 94Objective 8511 days ago
In an interview with Nova TV's 'Novi Dani' program, Croatian MP Zvonimir Troskot discussed Croatia's potential participation in a military parade in Paris hosted by French President Emmanuel Macron. The event aims to bring together representatives of the informal Coalition of Willing, a group of European countries aligned with France's foreign policy. While the defense minister has the authority to approve the deployment of soldiers without the president's consent, Troskot emphasized that President Zoran Milanović has remained silent on the issue. Troskot criticized the move, arguing that Croatia should focus on regional security issues rather than aligning with France's geopolitical agenda. He also raised concerns about the involvement of Croatian troops in potential conflicts against Russia, stating that Croatia would not send its youth into such battles. Additionally, Troskot addressed environmental concerns related to illegal waste disposal in Lika, highlighting the involvement of state authorities in the issue.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced discussion of political perspectives without overtly favoring any side. It includes direct quotes from Zvonimir Troskot expressing his views on national interests and geopolitical alignment while also mentioning the lack of official response from President Zoran Milan
Why these scores (Factual 94 · Objective 85): The article accurately presents Troskot’s analysis of the geopolitical implications. It avoids taking sides but emphasizes national interests over symbolic gestures.
N1 HrvatskaIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 7511 days ago
A new dispute has emerged between Croatian President Zoran Milanović and Prime Minister Andrej Plenković over Croatia's planned participation in a military parade in Paris on July 14, commemorating the Storming of the Bastille. The government had previously announced that Plenković would attend the event alongside 21 members of the Honorary Guard. However, Milanović opposed this, stating that Croatian soldiers would not participate in the parade. The Paris military parade, held annually since 1880 along the Champs-Élysées, includes French leaders, foreign dignitaries, and is broadcast live on national television. This year’s edition will emphasize military support for Ukraine, featuring around 10,000 French armed forces personnel and fighter jets, including one painted in the colors of the Ukrainian flag. France has invited representatives from 37 countries in the 'Coalition of Willing' to participate, though Croatia participates as a strategic partner and NATO member rather than a coalition member. Milanović noted that France was invited to a similar event in Croatia last year but did not attend.
Bias read (Center): The article presents both perspectives—Prime Minister Plenković's support for the parade and President Milanović's opposition—without overtly favoring either side. It provides factual background on the event and quotes both officials, maintaining neutrality in framing.
Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 75): Reports on the political conflict and possible outcomes, factually consistent with other sources. Objectivity is moderate, with some emphasis on governmental actions and reactions.
HRT (Hrvatska radiotelevizija)State / PublicCenterFactual 90Objective 708 days ago
The article discusses a political conflict between President Zoran Milanović and Prime Minister Andrej Plenković regarding the deployment of Croatian military personnel to a humanitarian mission in Paris. The disagreement escalated into tensions within the government, leading to the issue being brought before the Parliament. The situation involves the potential removal of General Tihomir Kundid, the head of the General Staff, due to his refusal to comply with the president’s order. Minister Ivan Anušić claims that Kundid has changed his stance under pressure from the president, potentially violating the law. Meanwhile, the government is considering alternative measures, including sending police forces instead of military personnel. Lawmakers have expressed concerns over the legality of the president’s directive and its implications for national sovereignty.
Bias read (Center): While the article presents a politically sensitive issue involving high-level government figures, it does not exhibit clear ideological leaning. It reports on both sides of the debate—criticism of the president’s decision by lawmakers and support for the government’s legal arguments. The tone is non
Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 70): Includes expert commentary and contextual information, factually aligned with other reports. Objectivity is somewhat lower due to the inclusion of opinions and less emphasis on impartiality.
Večernji listIndependentConservativeFactual 90Objective 6911 days ago
Prime Minister Andrej Plenković responded strongly to President Zoran Milanović's claim that the Croatian military would not participate in a military parade in Paris without his approval. Plenković stated that such ceremonial events fall under the jurisdiction of the Ministry of Defense, not the president. He emphasized Croatia's strategic partnership with France and insisted that the armed forces would attend the event. Plenković criticized Milanović's foreign policy stance, accusing him of being anti-Ukrainian, anti-European Union, and isolationist, while also expressing support for Russia. Additionally, he warned General Tihomir Kundic, Chief of the General Staff of the Armed Forces of Croatia, that if he did not comply with the ministry's directive regarding the parade, Plenković would lose trust in him and expect his resignation.
Bias read (Conservative): The article frames Plenković's response as a strong defense of institutional authority and national alignment with Western allies, while criticizing Milanović's policies as isolationist and pro-Russia. The language used by Plenković, including terms like 'national shame' and 'anti-EU narrative,' and
Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 69): Very factual with direct quotes and clear explanations. Objectivity is maintained through balanced reporting despite strong rhetoric.
HRT (Hrvatska radiotelevizija)State / PublicCenterFactual 90Objective 6811 days ago
Croatia's President Zoran Milanović stated that Croatia should not participate in this year's traditional military parade in Paris on Bastille Day, criticizing the event as promoting a 'coalition of willing' and suggesting it serves as propaganda for outgoing French leadership. Prime Minister Andrej Plenković responded by stating that decisions regarding Croatian military participation in ceremonial events are not within the president's authority but fall under the Ministry of Defense. He emphasized that such events are part of strategic partnerships and highlighted France's involvement in Croatia's Statehood Day celebrations. Plenković accused Milanović of maintaining an anti-Ukrainian and anti-European Union stance, noting his absence from Ukraine over the past five years.
Bias read (Center): The article presents both perspectives without overtly favoring one side. It includes direct quotes from both the president and prime minister, allowing readers to form their own opinions based on the provided information. There is no evident bias in the language used or the selection of sources.
Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 68): Highly factual with clear quotes and positions from both sides. Objectivity is good but slightly tilted towards the government's stance.
Telegram.hrIndependentProgressiveFactual 90Objective 6511 days ago
The article reports on a new conflict between Croatian President Zoran Milanović and Prime Minister Andrej Plenković over the participation of the Honorary Protection Battalion in a military parade in Paris commemorating France’s National Day on July 14th. Plenković and Defense Minister Ivan Anušić argue that sending the battalion does not require Milanović’s approval, asserting it is a ceremonial event rather than a military operation. Milanović counters by claiming he is the supreme commander of the armed forces under the constitution and law, implying that the decision should rest with him. He criticizes France for not attending a previous military parade in Zagreb and accuses it of arms trade with Serbia, suggesting France is ignoring Croatia. The dispute highlights tensions between civilian leadership and the military, as well as broader geopolitical issues.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the conflict through Milanović’s perspective, emphasizing his constitutional authority and criticizing France’s foreign policies. While both leaders have valid positions, the narrative leans toward supporting Milanović’s stance by highlighting his legal arguments and grievances,暗示
Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 65): Provides specific details about the conflict and government actions, factually aligned with other sources. Objectivity is lower due to emotionally charged language such as 'teške riječi' (heavy words) and 'ultimatumi' (ultimatums).
Jutarnji listIndependentProgressiveFactual 90Objective 6511 days ago
President Zoran Milanović made several comments during a ceremony commemorating the Day of the City and the feast days of Saints Peter and Paul in Supetar. He discussed the impact of his government's actions regarding Swiss francs, stating that banks had taken advantage of people but eventually returned some funds. He avoided commenting on the government's anti-inflation measures, asking reporters if they were expecting something else. Milanović also addressed the revocation of honors from Branimir Glavaš, explaining that he would take back the honors if the court ruled against him again. Regarding the upcoming World Cup matches, he said he would watch them from home like everyone else. On the issue of Croatia's participation in a military parade in Paris, Milanović criticized Prime Minister Andrej Plenković for not addressing the situation earlier. He claimed that the decision to send troops lies with him as the Supreme Commander under the Croatian Constitution and that Croatia would not attend due to its own military parade and tensions with Serbia.
Bias read (Progressive): The article presents President Milanović's strong criticism of Prime Minister Plenković, using confrontational language such as 'national shame' and asserting his authority over military decisions. The framing emphasizes Milanović's control and Plenković's perceived weakness, suggesting a leftward倾斜
Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 65): Accurate description of the conflict and background, including quotes from Milanović. Objectivity is compromised by the inclusion of personal comments and less emphasis on broader context.
tportalIndependentProgressiveFactual 89Objective 6711 days ago
Croatian President Zoran Milanović and Prime Minister Andrej Plenković are engaged in a heated dispute over Croatia's participation in a military parade in Paris organized by French President Emmanuel Macron. The disagreement centers on whether Croatian troops should attend the event, which Milanović dismissively refers to as a 'marching band performance,' while Plenković insists it is a formal ceremonial visit. Milanović claims he has the constitutional authority to decide such matters and criticizes France for selling advanced fighter jets to Serbia. Plenković responds by accusing Milanović of maintaining an anti-Ukraine stance and opposing European Union integration during his time as prime minister.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the conflict between the president and prime minister through the lens of Milanović's constitutional authority and criticism of France's foreign policy, using language that aligns with left-leaning critiques of NATO/EU alignment and defense spending. The narrative emphasizes Milan
Why these scores (Factual 89 · Objective 67): Factual reporting with direct quotes from both leaders. Objectivity is slightly affected by the tone of the article, which seems to favor one perspective over another.
HRT (Hrvatska radiotelevizija)State / PublicProgressiveFactual 88Objective 6810 days ago
The article reports on a conflict between President Zoran Milanović and Prime Minister Andrej Plenković regarding the participation of the Croatian military in a traditional military parade in Paris. The disagreement centers on whether the decision to send troops to the event falls under the president’s constitutional authority. Milanović argues that Croatia should not participate in an event he believes is used to promote 'coalitions of goodwill,' while Plenković claims such decisions are outside the president’s jurisdiction. The prime minister has threatened to demand the resignation of Chief of Staff Tihomir Kundic if the military does not comply with the defense ministry’s directive.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the dispute through the lens of presidential authority versus executive oversight, emphasizing Milanović’s constitutional arguments and his criticism of the event as promoting 'coalitions of goodwill.' While both leaders have valid positions, the narrative leans toward supporting,
Why these scores (Factual 88 · Objective 68): Factual content aligns with reported events, though some commentary may lean toward political criticism. Objectivity is slightly compromised by the tone of the analysis.
Jutarnji listIndependentConservativeFactual 88Objective 677 days ago
Premijer Andrej Plenković bio je prisutan na prvoj sjednici Vijeća za regionalni razvoj u Đakovu, gdje je obratio se javnosti. U svojoj izjavi, Plenković je komentirao situaciju oko mimohoda u Parizu, tvrdeći da će Hrvatska poslati policiju kako bi 'dostojanstveno' predstavila zemlju. Navela je da je načelnik Glavnog stožera Tihomir Kundid poslušao 'Milanovićeve zapovijed' kao da su u ratnom stanju, što smatra besmislenim. Plenković je također napomenuo da je Milanović promijenio svoju retoriku, ali da se nije promijenio, te da postoji 'fundamentalni problem' s nekim ko ne želi biti dio zapadnog kruga. Također je komentirao utakmicu Hrvatske i Portugala na Svjetskom prvenstvu, izrazivši stav da je rezultat nepravedan.
Bias read (Conservative): Artikel je okretnut prema kontrastu između Plenkovića i Milanovića, s naglaskom na 'neslušanje' Kundida i 'besmisleno' ponašanje Milanovića. Korištenje izraza poput 'glumi', 'nepravedno' i 'izolacionistička politika' sugerira pristranost prema aktualnoj vladi i kritiku suprotstavljenog lidera. Iako
Why these scores (Factual 88 · Objective 67): Factual content with expert opinions and quotes. Objectivity is slightly reduced by the inclusion of political commentary and potential bias.
Net.hrIndependentCenterFactual 87Objective 6611 days ago
Croatian President Zoran Milanović has stated that Croatia's military will not participate in a military parade in Paris commemorating the fall of the Bastille, which is scheduled for July 14. This decision has sparked a disagreement between Milanović and Prime Minister Andrej Plenković, who suggested that the Chief of the General Staff might lose their mandate if the military does not attend. The article references a 2013 event where Croatian troops participated in a similar parade in Paris, during which Ivo Josipović was president and Milanović was prime minister.
Bias read (Center): The article presents both the positions of President Milanović and Prime Minister Plenković without overtly favoring either side. It provides historical context and quotes from both leaders, offering a balanced perspective on the disagreement over military participation in the Paris parade.
Why these scores (Factual 87 · Objective 66): Accurately describes the ongoing conflict and references past events. Objectivity is somewhat compromised by the narrative style and emphasis on specific viewpoints.
Net.hrIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 8011 days ago
President Zoran Milanović participated in a ceremonial meeting of the City Council of Supetar to commemorate City Day and the feast of Saints Peter and Paul. During his remarks to the media, he commented on a court ruling regarding 'Swiss bankers,' stating that the 'anthology' around the Swiss franc is one of the results of his government's work. He criticized past banking practices where banks exploited citizens but acknowledged some returns to consumers. The ruling was part of a broader decision by the Supreme Court concerning interest charges for consumers with converted loans, with costs borne by the plaintiff bank. Milanović also addressed the revocation of honors awarded to Branimir Glavaš, emphasizing his adherence to legal procedures and expressing frustration over the process. He further criticized Prime Minister Andrej Plenković for leading a 'horde' and questioned who would represent Croatia at a military parade in Paris, suggesting possible gender-based assumptions.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames criticism toward Prime Minister Andrej Plenković using derogatory terms like 'plenković vodi cijelu hordu' which implies a negative characterization of his leadership style. The tone suggests skepticism towards Plenković’s decisions, particularly regarding international engagement
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 80): The article provides accurate details about Milanović's comments on the Swiss franc case and his stance on the military parade in Paris. It cites specific legal references and quotes from officials. However, it lacks depth on the broader conflict between Milanović and Plenković.
Jutarnji listIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 759 days ago
Former Chief of the General Staff of the Croatian Armed Forces, Josip Lucić, stated that current Chief of the General Staff, General Tihomir Kundid, is not solely accountable to the President of Croatia but also to the Government, the Minister of Defense, and the Croatian Parliament. Lucić emphasized that Kundid was appointed by the President based on a proposal from the Government with the approval of the Parliament, meaning his actions must align with legal frameworks and institutional oversight. The President, Zoran Milanović, has reiterated his decision that members of the Croatian military will not participate in a military parade in Paris on July 14th and ordered Kundid to carry out this directive. However, Lucić warned that if Kundid follows the President’s order, which he claims contradicts the Law on Defense, Kundid could face legal sanctions. He noted that the law takes precedence over both the President and the Chief of the General Staff, and that previous Presidents, including Stjepan Mesić, had respected these legal boundaries. Lucić suggested Kundid has two options: either comply with the President’s order and risk legal consequences or refuse and potentially face re-
Bias read (Center): The article presents perspectives from former and current military officials regarding the legal and constitutional responsibilities of the Chief of the General Staff. It includes balanced quotes from Josip Lucić, who outlines the legal framework and potential consequences for non-compliance, aswell
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 75): Detailed and factual account based on statements from former officials. Maintains an objective tone by presenting both sides' positions without overt bias.
tportalIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 7510 days ago
President of Croatia Zoran Milanović is set to address the public at 11 AM from the Presidential Office in Pantovčak. He is expected to comment on the current conflict with the government regarding Croatia's military participation in a military parade in Paris commemorating Bastille Day. The tensions between the presidential office and the government have intensified after Milanović stated that without his approval, the Croatian army would not participate in the French event. Prime Minister Andrej Plenković and Defense Minister Ivan Anušić argue that sending troops for ceremonial purposes falls under the ministry's jurisdiction, not the president's. Plenković further warned that General Tihomir Kundid, head of the General Staff of the Armed Forces of Croatia, would lose his trust if he does not follow the defense minister's instructions. Milanović is also anticipated to address the issue of the president's constitutional authority as the supreme commander of the armed forces.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the situation objectively, detailing both the president's stance and the government's position without overtly favoring either side. It reports on the conflict over military authority and constitutional powers without using biased language or selectively citing sources.
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 75): The article accurately reports the planned address by Zoran Milanović and the ongoing political dispute with Prime Minister Plenković regarding Croatia's military participation in the Bastille Day parade. It provides context about the tensions between the presidency and the government. The objectivi
Telegram.hrIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 6510 days ago
The article reports on escalating tensions between Croatian President Zoran Milanović and Prime Minister Andrej Plenković regarding the deployment of the Croatian Armed Forces to a military parade in Paris on July 14th. Plenković informed the government that he had received a request from French President Emmanuel Macron for Croatia’s participation, which he accepted. He emphasized that the decision should be made by the Chief of Staff of the Croatian Armed Forces, Tihomir Kundid, without needing presidential approval. In response, Milanović accused Plenković of bypassing him as the head of state and claimed that Kundid was threatened by someone close to Plenković, possibly Zvonimir Frka-Petešić, who allegedly warned Kundid that he would be replaced if he did not appear at a meeting. Milanović called for an emergency meeting with Plenković to address concerns over the integrity of the command structure.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the conflict as a challenge to the president’s authority and highlights his accusations against the prime minister and the chief of staff. The emphasis on the president’s direct mandate and the alleged undermining of the command structure suggests a left-leaning perspective, align
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 65): Consistent with other sources regarding the disagreement over military participation. Maintains a balanced tone, though there is subtle criticism of Milanović's stance.
N1 HrvatskaIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 6510 days ago
Urša Raukar-Gamulin, a member of the parliamentary group Možemo, discussed the open conflict between Croatian President Zoran Milanović and Prime Minister Andrej Plenković regarding the deployment of Croatian soldiers to a military parade in Paris. She criticized the situation as an escalation of a long-standing feud between two political factions, which she claims undermines Croatia's credibility internationally. Raukar-Gamulin argued that placing the Chief of the General Staff in a position where he must choose between the two leaders violates the constitution and harms national unity. She expressed concern that such internal conflicts send a message to the international community that Croatia is not a serious country.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the conflict between the president and prime minister as harmful to national unity and constitutional integrity, criticizes the ruling party's methods as autocratic, and highlights the negative impact on Croatia's international reputation. The tone is critical of the current power
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 65): Reports historical context and current conflict accurately. Objectivity is lower due to the focus on past events and possible biased interpretation of the situation.
tportalIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 6510 days ago
The article discusses a disagreement between Croatian Prime Minister Andrej Plenković and President Zoran Milanović regarding Croatia's participation in a traditional military parade commemorating the Fall of Bastille in Paris. The French government invited all members of the Coalition of Willing Nations, including Croatia, but the Croatian government confirmed that Premier Plenković and around twenty members of the Honor Guard would attend. In response, President Milanović stated that as the supreme commander, he does not allow the military to participate in such parades, citing past experiences where France was unresponsive despite previous financial contributions and commercial ties. He criticized the decision as isolationist and emphasized the need to respect laws. Plenković countered by stating that military protocol and ceremonial duties fall under the Ministry of Defense, not the president, and warned that if the Chief of Staff of the Armed Forces, Tihomir Kundid, does not comply with the defense minister’s instructions, he expects his resignation. Additionally, the article mentions that the government will discuss budgetary frameworks and legal issues during its upcoming pl
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the conflict as stemming from President Milanović's opposition to the military parade, emphasizing his role as supreme commander and criticizing the government's decision as isolationist. It highlights his concerns over past interactions with France and portrays the government's立场
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 65): Reports the situation accurately, including the planned response from Milanović. Maintains a neutral tone while highlighting the tension between the presidency and the government.
HRT (Hrvatska radiotelevizija)State / PublicCenterFactual 85Objective 605 days ago
The article discusses a conflict between President Zoran Milanović and the government regarding the deployment of Croatian military personnel to a military parade in Paris, highlighting concerns over unclear division of powers between the president and executive authorities. Former HSP president Anto Đapić and law professor Viktor Gotovac, guests on an HRT program, argue that this dispute reflects part of Milanović’s long-term political strategy, particularly his campaign to gain power in parliamentary elections after his presidential term. They criticize both the president and prime minister for acting in an unprofessional manner, undermining the country’s image and failing to respect constitutional boundaries. Gotovac emphasizes the need for clarity on constitutional issues, especially regarding the role of the state and laws within the framework of the constitution, and warns that such disputes harm Croatia’s reputation.
Bias read (Center): While the article criticizes both the president and prime minister for their handling of the issue, it does not clearly favor one side over the other. The framing remains balanced, presenting the perspectives of two experts without overtly endorsing either political position. The language used is客观,
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 60): Lucić provides detailed information on the legal framework and responsibilities, aligning with cross-source consensus. The tone remains objective despite discussing tensions between branches of government.
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
Croatia
