The article reports that the Cycling Union in Zagreb has called on citizens to report obstacles on cycling paths, such as concrete balls, overgrown vegetation, branches entering the path profile, and broken glass, so they can be removed promptly. Citizens are encouraged to report these issues directly to Zagreb traffic police via email or phone, as well as to local municipal committees. The union also urges residents to send copies of their reports to the Cycling Union itself, enabling them to take further action if problems remain unresolved within a reasonable timeframe. Various types of infrastructure damage are mentioned as reportable, including those that hinder safe cycling.
Bias read (Center): The article presents information about a civic initiative led by the Cycling Union, which is a non-governmental organization. While the issue of cycling infrastructure is politically relevant, the tone and framing of the article remain neutral, focusing on informing the public about a specific call‐
Why factuality (85): The article reports on an initiative by the Union of Cyclists in Zagreb encouraging citizens to report infrastructure issues affecting cyclists. It provides specific examples of problems like concrete balls, overgrown vegetation, branches encroaching on bike paths, and broken glass. The information
Why objectivity (80): The tone is informative and civic-minded, focusing on encouraging public participation. While there is no overt bias, the article subtly promotes the Union of Cyclists' cause by highlighting their call to action. This slight promotional angle slightly reduces objectivity.






