ON
← Back to feed
Beauty prepayment losses hit S$1.9m in first half of 2026, nearly 18 times higher than a year ago: CASE
SG🏛️ PoliticsCenter9 days ago

Beauty prepayment losses hit S$1.9m in first half of 2026, nearly 18 times higher than a year ago: CASE

In the first half of 2026, Singaporean consumers reported over S$1.9 million in beauty-related prepayment losses, nearly 18 times higher than the S$108,000 recorded in the first half of 2025. The Consumers Association of Singapore (CASE) received 1,124 complaints against the beauty industry, more than double the number from the previous year. These increases were primarily attributed to the sudden closure of multiple beauty and wellness businesses, leaving many customers unable to use their prepaid services. Nearly 40% of complaints involved businesses failing to honor contractual obligations, while other issues included unethical sales practices and refund problems. CASE highlighted specific cases such as the closure of Royal Secrets Wellness, resulting in over S$1 million in losses, and Wan Yang Health Products, causing S$137,000 in unutilized prepaid package losses. CASE urged consumers to avoid large upfront payments and called for stronger protections for prepayments.

Consumer complaints in the beauty industry surged dramatically in the first half of 2026, reaching over $1.9 million in prepayment losses, a figure nearly 18 times higher than the $108,000 recorded in the same period in 2025, according to the Consumers Association of Singapore (CASE). This marks a significant shift, as the beauty sector has now surpassed the motorcar industry, which previously led in complaint numbers during the first half of 2025. The surge in complaints and financial losses is attributed primarily to the sudden closure of multiple beauty and wellness businesses, leaving many customers with unpaid services and substantial financial setbacks. Between January and June 2026, CASE received 1,124 complaints against the beauty industry, more than double the 558 filed in the same period the previous year. These figures reflect a broader trend of rising consumer grievances, with overall complaints increasing by 6.9 percent to 6,684, compared to 6,253 in the first half of 2025. The top five industries generating the highest number of complaints remained consistent, though the order shifted slightly. While the motorcar industry still ranks high, the travel sector climbed into the top five for the first time since early 2022, driven by a steep 76.4 percent increase in complaints, rising from 246 to 434. Among the beauty-related complaints, nearly 40 percent were linked to businesses failing to meet contractual obligations, often resulting from unexpected closures. One notable case involves the sudden shutdown of Royal Secrets Wellness, which left customers with over $1 million in unclaimed prepayments. A single customer reportedly lost around $50,000 in such instances. Similarly, the closure of Wan Yang Health Product and Foot Reflexology Centre resulted in over $137,000 in unutilized prepaid packages. These incidents highlight the growing risk associated with large upfront payments for beauty treatments and wellness services. In addition to payment disputes, other common concerns included allegations of unethical sales practices, which accounted for 15.3 percent of all complaints, and delayed or denied refunds, affecting 13.8 percent of complainants. CASE President Melvin Yong emphasized the need for caution, urging consumers to avoid large advance payments and instead opt for payment plans that allow for more flexibility. He called for stronger regulatory measures to safeguard consumers' interests, stating that “consumers should avoid making large advance payments where possible and consider paying per use or in smaller instalments.” Meanwhile, the travel industry also experienced a sharp uptick in complaints, with a 76.4 percent increase in reports to 434. This growth was largely fueled by a dramatic rise in issues related to online travel agents, which saw a 148.9 percent jump in complaints, from 139 to 346. Most of these complaints centered on delayed, refused, or withheld refunds, accounting for 39.3 percent of the total. The airline industry also reported an increase, with 192 complaints logged in the first six months of 2026, representing a 19.3 percent rise from the previous year. CASE attributed this surge to ongoing geopolitical tensions and frequent changes to flight schedules, which have heightened the chances of travel disruptions and service failures. As the beauty and travel sectors continue to face mounting consumer concerns, CASE has urged individuals to scrutinize booking terms and refund policies, especially when engaging with intermediaries such as online travel agents. The association also recommends purchasing comprehensive travel insurance to cover potential losses from cancellations, delays, or unforeseen circumstances. With these developments, the landscape of consumer protection in Singapore appears to be evolving rapidly, reflecting both challenges and opportunities for improved oversight and support mechanisms.

2 reports

The Straits Times logoThe Straits TimesParty-aligned🔒CenterFactual 95Objective 909 days ago
Beauty industry prepayment losses up almost 18 times to over $1.9 million in first half of 2026: CASE

Consumer complaints in Singapore's beauty industry surged significantly in the first half of 2026, with prepayment losses reaching over $1.9 million, a 18-fold increase from the previous year. The Consumers Association of Singapore (CASE) attributed this spike to the sudden closure of multiple beauty and wellness businesses, including Royal Secrets Wellness, which caused over $1 million in losses. Over 1,124 complaints were filed against the beauty sector, more than double the number from 2025. Nearly 40% of these complaints involved businesses failing to deliver promised services. CASE warned consumers about the risks of large upfront payments and advised using installment plans. Other common complaints included unethical sales practices and refund delays. Meanwhile, the travel industry also saw a sharp rise in complaints, primarily linked to online travel agents.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual data and reports from CASE without overt ideological slant. It focuses on economic and consumer protection issues rather than partisan politics. While the topic involves regulatory oversight, the framing remains neutral, balancing both the problem and the advice provided

Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports the statistics provided by CASE, including the increase in prepayment losses and complaints. It cites specific figures and mentions the reasons behind the rise in complaints, such as business closures. The information aligns with the cross-source consensus between this

Why objectivity (90): The tone remains neutral, presenting facts without emotional language. However, there is a slight editorial tilt in mentioning the 'sudden closure' of businesses, which may imply some level of judgment, though it is presented as a factual cause.

Channel NewsAsia (CNA) logoChannel NewsAsia (CNA)State / PublicCenterFactual 95Objective 909 days ago
Beauty prepayment losses hit S$1.9m in first half of 2026, nearly 18 times higher than a year ago: CASE

In the first half of 2026, Singaporean consumers reported over S$1.9 million in beauty-related prepayment losses, nearly 18 times higher than the S$108,000 recorded in the first half of 2025. The Consumers Association of Singapore (CASE) received 1,124 complaints against the beauty industry, more than double the number from the previous year. These increases were primarily attributed to the sudden closure of multiple beauty and wellness businesses, leaving many customers unable to use their prepaid services. Nearly 40% of complaints involved businesses failing to honor contractual obligations, while other issues included unethical sales practices and refund problems. CASE highlighted specific cases such as the closure of Royal Secrets Wellness, resulting in over S$1 million in losses, and Wan Yang Health Products, causing S$137,000 in unutilized prepaid package losses. CASE urged consumers to avoid large upfront payments and called for stronger protections for prepayments.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual data on consumer complaints and financial losses within the beauty industry, focusing on the impact of business closures and the need for consumer protection measures. It does not exhibit clear ideological bias, instead providing statistical information and quotes from a

Why factuality (95): This article provides consistent data with the first article, including the $1.9 million prepayment losses and the doubling of complaints. It references the same causes, such as business closures, and includes additional details like percentages of complaint types, which add depth without contradict

Why objectivity (90): The article maintains a neutral tone but uses phrases like 'alleged unethical sales tactics' which could be seen as slightly biased. However, it presents these as part of the data rather than personal opinion, maintaining overall balance.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories