ON
← Back to feed
Barbers: There should be no double standard in enforcing sub judice rule
PH🏛️ PoliticsCenter7 hr. ago

Barbers: There should be no double standard in enforcing sub judice rule

The Philippine Daily Inquirer reported that Robert Ace Barbers, an adviser and spokesperson for the House impeachment team, stated there should be no double standards in applying the sub judice rule during Vice President Sara Z. Duterte's impeachment trial. He emphasized that if Rule 18 of the impeachment court is enforced, it must apply equally to everyone involved. The sub judice rule typically prevents discussion of ongoing legal cases to ensure fairness. Barbers' comments suggest concerns about potential bias or unequal application of legal procedures in the trial.

1 reports

Philippine Daily Inquirer logoPhilippine Daily InquirerIndependentCenterFactual 75Objective 657 hr. ago
Barbers: There should be no double standard in enforcing sub judice rule

The Philippine Daily Inquirer reported that Robert Ace Barbers, an adviser and spokesperson for the House impeachment team, stated there should be no double standards in applying the sub judice rule during Vice President Sara Z. Duterte's impeachment trial. He emphasized that if Rule 18 of the impeachment court is enforced, it must apply equally to everyone involved. The sub judice rule typically prevents discussion of ongoing legal cases to ensure fairness. Barbers' comments suggest concerns about potential bias or unequal application of legal procedures in the trial.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a statement from a member of the House impeachment team regarding the enforcement of the sub judice rule in Vice President Sara Z. Duterte's impeachment trial. It does not exhibit clear bias toward either side but rather reports on a call for equal application of legal rules. No

Why factuality (75): The article accurately reports Robert Ace Barbers' statement regarding the enforcement of the sub judice rule in Vice President Sara Z. Duterte's impeachment trial. It does not make unsupported claims but presents his position as stated. However, since there is no primary source provided, the factua

Why objectivity (65): The article uses direct quotes from Barbers and presents his argument without overt bias. However, the title implies a stance against double standards, which may subtly frame the issue in favor of Barbers’ perspective rather than presenting both sides equally.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories