PHLawyer Levito Baligod, representing 18 individuals known as the 'maleta boys' who previously alleged they were former bodyguards of ex-Ako Bicol Representative Zaldy Co, has clarified that he did not profit from his clients to create a joint affidavit accusing several government officials of involvement in flood control issues. The clarification follows the recantation of four of the accused individuals. Baligod's statement suggests ongoing legal and political tensions surrounding the allegations against government officials related to flood management.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual clarification by lawyer Levito Baligod regarding potential conflicts of interest in a legal case involving political figures. While the subject matter involves allegations against government officials, the framing remains neutral, focusing on the legal implications and
Why factuality (75): The article reports on lawyer Levito Baligod’s statement regarding his clients' recanting and denies profiting from them. It references the 'maleta boys' and their involvement with ex-Ako Bicol Rep. Zaldy Co, but lacks specific details or citations to support these claims. Since no primary source is
Why objectivity (65): The tone suggests a narrative around legal proceedings and potential corruption, implying a certain stance on the matter. While not overtly biased, the focus on Baligod’s denial and the mention of 'flood control anomalies' may subtly frame the story in a way that aligns with broader political narrat
