In a significant move that has raised concerns about the integrity of ongoing legal processes, the Azerbaijani court handling the financial crimes trial of journalists associated with Meydan TV has replaced the entire judicial panel overseeing the case. This decision has sparked fears among defense lawyers that the months-long proceedings might need to be restarted from the beginning. Twelve journalists connected to the news outlet have been on trial since December 2025 at the Baku Court of Grave Crimes, facing charges that could lead to prison sentences of up to 12 years. International human rights organizations have criticized the trial, suggesting that the charges are being used to retaliate against the defendants for their investigative journalism, which has exposed high-level corruption within the country.
Orkhan Mammadov, an editor at Meydan TV currently living in exile, stated that the abrupt replacement of the judicial panel was a calculated strategy by the authorities in Baku to apply psychological pressure on the journalists and prolong the legal process. Defense attorneys representing several of the reporters expressed their apprehension that, according to Azerbaijani law, replacing an entire panel of judges does not allow for the continuation of the trial. Instead, Nemat Karimli, a defense lawyer representing Ramin Jabrayilzade, suggested that the trial would effectively have to begin anew. Similarly, Rovshana Rahimli, another defense attorney representing Aysel Umudova, voiced similar concerns, emphasizing that there is a possibility the trial could restart entirely.
Mammadov noted that the authorities had previously delayed numerous trial dates, resulting in a stagnation of the proceedings for the last three months. One notable instance occurred on May 22, when the judges abruptly ended the testimony of detained journalist Khayala Agayeva after she referenced Heydar Aliyev, the son of Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev, in her statement. Mammadov claimed that the authorities were setting an example by targeting his colleagues but affirmed that they would continue to speak openly and report the truth without fear.
The case commenced in early December 2024 with the detention of six Meydan TV staff members and a media trainer, who were subsequently charged with "smuggling committed by an organized group." Additional arrests followed in the subsequent months, bringing five more journalists affiliated with the outlet into custody. Since late 2023, at least two dozen independent journalists have been detained, marking what rights groups describe as an extraordinary suppression of the free press in Azerbaijan. Recently, press freedom organizations have condemned a state prosecutor's request for prison terms of up to 15 years for a group of journalists at the independent outlet Toplum TV, who are also facing financial crimes charges.
The upcoming hearing for the trial of the Meydan TV journalists is scheduled for July, adding to the anticipation and uncertainty surrounding the future of the case. The situation highlights broader issues regarding press freedom and the rule of law in Azerbaijan, where international observers have long expressed concerns about the independence of the judiciary and the treatment of journalists critical of the government.
4 reports
OCCRPIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 8516 days agoAn Azerbaijani court has replaced the entire judicial panel handling the trial of twelve journalists from Meydan TV, raising concerns that the trial will need to restart from the beginning. The journalists are being tried on charges of financial crimes, with potential prison sentences of up to 12 years. International human rights organizations have criticized the trial, suggesting the charges are aimed at punishing the journalists for their investigative reporting on high-level corruption. Defense lawyers argue that replacing the entire panel is an attempt to delay the process and exert 'psych
Bias read (Center): The article presents facts without overtly biased language or framing. It reports on the replacement of the judicial panel and quotes both defense lawyers and international rights groups, providing multiple perspectives without favoring any side.
Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 85): Highly factual with specific details about the judicial panel replacement and quotes from defense lawyers. Slightly less objective due to mentioning international rights groups' condemnation, which implies a perspective.
The HillIndependentCenter13 days agoSpanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez's wife, Begoña Gómez, has been ordered by a court to surrender her passport in preparation for a corruption trial. She faces charges of using her influence to assist private companies in securing government contracts and misusing public funds. These allegations involve potential abuse of her position for personal or private sector benefit. The case could have significant implications for Spain's political landscape, particularly given her husband's role as head of government.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the legal proceedings against the wife of the Spanish Prime Minister in a neutral manner, without apparent ideological framing or biased language. It reports on the judicial order and the nature of the charges without taking a stance or emphasizing particular perspectives.
The Washington TimesParty-alignedCenter13 days agoA Spanish judge has ordered the wife of Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez, Begoña Gómez, to face trial on charges of corruption and influence peddling, requiring her to surrender her passport and appear in court regularly. The charges include allegations that she used her position to influence government contracts awarded to technology firms, misused public funds in hiring a consultant, and improperly used software during her tenure as a university professor. Gómez denies the allegations, and Sánchez claims the case is a politically motivated smear campaign by conservative opponents. The ruling has sparked significant political tension, with the opposition calling for the government to resign and accusing the Socialist administration of undermining democracy. Meanwhile, the conservative opposition demands an early election, alleging that the government is attacking judicial independence. The investigation was initiated by the anti-corruption group Manos Limpias, known for pursuing cases often tied to conservative interests.
Bias read (Center): The article presents both the prosecution's allegations and the defense's counterarguments, including statements from the prime minister, the accused, and opposing political factions. It does not favor one side over the other, providing balanced quotes and context from various stakeholders involved.
Bloomberg NewsIndependent🔒Center13 days agoA Madrid court has ordered the wife of Spain's Prime Minister, Pedro Sánchez, Begoña Gómez, to face trial on multiple charges including influence peddling, corruption in business dealings, and embezzlement of public funds. The ruling comes after an investigation into alleged misuse of public resources and improper influence in business matters. The court also mandated that she surrender her passport, potentially restricting her ability to travel internationally during the legal proceedings. This development adds another layer of scrutiny around the prime minister's family and raises questions about potential conflicts of interest within the government.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the legal action against the prime minister's wife in a neutral manner, focusing on the judicial order and the charges brought by the court. There is no overtly biased language, and the report does not favor either the prosecution or the defense. It provides the facts without明显的
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
Become a Supporter
United States
