ON
← Back to feed
Vanguard Nigeria logo🏛️ Politics
NG🏛️ PoliticsCenteryesterday

Awujale stool: Court sends Fusengbuwa suit to administrative judge for reassignment

A legal dispute over the selection process for the next Awujale, the traditional ruler of Ijebuland, has been temporarily delayed as a court orders the case to be reassigned. The suit was filed by the Fusengbuwa ruling house against Governor Dapo Abiodun, the Awujale kingmakers, and other defendants, challenging claims that the government has interfered with the process of choosing the new ruler following the death of Oba Sikiru Adetona in July 2025. Justice A. A. Omoniyi, presiding in Ijebu-Ode, stated he would be on annual vacation and thus directed the case to be returned to the administrative judge for reallocation. The matter is set to be heard again on September 23. Counsel for the Fusengbuwa ruling house emphasized the urgency of the issue, noting that prolonged absence of a ruler could disrupt local governance and traditions.

A vacation judge of the Ogun State High Court, Justice A. A. Omoniyi, sitting in Court 3, Ijebu-Ode, on Wednesday ordered that a suit filed by the Fusengbuwa ruling house against Governor Dapo Abiodun, the Awujale kingmakers and other defendants be returned to the administrative judge for reassignment. The suit, which challenges the alleged stoppage of the process for selecting the next Awujale and paramount ruler of Ijebuland, was filed on August 21, 2026, and numbered HCJ/149/2026. Justice Omoniyi stated he would be proceeding on his annual vacation within the next one week and might not resume until January 2027. Although aware of the urgency of the matter, he was constrained by the limited time available to him before his vacation. Consequently, he directed that the case file be returned to the administrative judge for reallocation. The matter was adjourned until September 23 for further hearing. Counsel to the Fusengbuwa ruling house, Otunba Olusegun Otayemi, informed the court that all the 15 defendants had been duly served with the originating processes and that the claimants were ready to proceed with the case. However, Otunba Kunle Kalejaiye, SAN, representing the seventh to 15th defendants, including the kingmakers, indicated that they were still within the stipulated period to respond to the suit and would file their processes accordingly. A state counsel, W. A. Onawole, also appeared for Governor Abiodun, the Commissioner for Justice and Attorney-General of the state, and four other defendants. The kingmakers were present in court, led by Olorogun (Dr Sunny Kuku), co-founder of EKO Hospital and the Ogbeni Oja of Ijebuland. Also in court were the Chairman of the Fusengbuwa Ruling House, Otunba Abdulateef Owoyemi; his deputy, Otunba Adedokun Ajidagba; and the vice-chairman, Prof. Fassy Yusuf. Speaking with journalists after the proceedings, Otayemi explained that the ruling house instituted the action to challenge what it described as undue government interference in the process of selecting the next Awujale following the death of Oba Sikiru Adetona in July 2025. He emphasized that the law does not permit a deliberate stoppage of such a process. While delays due to unforeseen circumstances may be excusable, a deliberate and orchestrated halt is not acceptable. Otayemi noted that the judge’s absence during the next hearing could lead the case to be reassigned to another court, highlighting the urgency of the matter. Owoyemi added that the family was compelled to seek judicial intervention because it could not continue to wait indefinitely for the appointment of a new Awujale from the ruling house. He mentioned that the family had only 14 days under the law to complete the process and did so within 10 days. Upon delivering the necessary documents to the kingmakers, they were given seven days to appoint an Awujale. Instead, a letter arrived requesting the entire process be halted due to所谓的 petitions, which the ruling house had never received. They were not provided with the security report or any copies of the petition until now. Owoyemi also highlighted the efforts made by the Imam, the Muslims of Ijebuland, and the Christians of Ijebuland to gain access to the governor to expedite the matter, but nothing had materialized. He stressed that waiting indefinitely was not an option, hence the decision to approach the court for intervention. The ruling house had joined Governor Abiodun, the state Commissioner for Justice and Attorney-General of the state, and others in the lawsuit, seeking clarity and resolution to the ongoing dispute over the selection of the next Awujale.

1 reports

Vanguard Nigeria logoVanguard NigeriaIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 80yesterday
Awujale stool: Court sends Fusengbuwa suit to administrative judge for reassignment

A legal dispute over the selection process for the next Awujale, the traditional ruler of Ijebuland, has been temporarily delayed as a court orders the case to be reassigned. The suit was filed by the Fusengbuwa ruling house against Governor Dapo Abiodun, the Awujale kingmakers, and other defendants, challenging claims that the government has interfered with the process of choosing the new ruler following the death of Oba Sikiru Adetona in July 2025. Justice A. A. Omoniyi, presiding in Ijebu-Ode, stated he would be on annual vacation and thus directed the case to be returned to the administrative judge for reallocation. The matter is set to be heard again on September 23. Counsel for the Fusengbuwa ruling house emphasized the urgency of the issue, noting that prolonged absence of a ruler could disrupt local governance and traditions.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual account of a legal proceeding involving a traditional leadership dispute. It includes statements from both the plaintiffs and defendants without overtly favoring either side. The framing remains neutral, focusing on procedural aspects of the court’s decision ratherthan

Why factuality (85): The article provides detailed information about a legal case involving the Fusengbuwa ruling house challenging Governor Dapo Abiodun and others. It reports the court's decision to send the case back to an administrative judge, the date the suit was filed, and the judge's upcoming vacation. These det

Why objectivity (80): The article presents the legal proceedings in a neutral manner, reporting statements from both sides and the court's actions without apparent bias. It uses formal language appropriate for legal reporting and does not include emotionally charged language or overtly subjective commentary.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories