The average CEO of a UK-listed company now earns £5 million annually, marking a new record and reflecting a widening gap compared to the average worker, who earns roughly £40,000 per year. This disparity—130 times greater, has grown since last year, when the ratio stood at 124 times. According to the High Pay Centre, a London-based think tank, the figure represents an eight-year high and underscores a trend of executive compensation growing faster than wages for ordinary employees. The research reveals that the median pay and benefits package for a chief executive of an FTSE 100 firm reached a record level of just over £5 million, representing an 8.6% increase from the previous year. This surge contrasts sharply with the 3.6% rise in earnings for typical UK workers during the same period. Over the past four years, executive pay in the FTSE 100 has consistently climbed, with the rate of increase beginning to significantly outpace that of regular staff. Andrew Speke, interim director at the High Pay Centre, expressed concern over the growing chasm between executive and worker pay. He noted that the situation serves as a clear warning to policymakers and business leaders who may have overlooked the implications of rising executive remuneration. Speke emphasized that the continued expansion of this gap risks eroding public trust in the economic system and potentially fueling the rise of right-wing populist movements. Speke also addressed the incoming prime minister, Andy Burnham, urging him to prioritize economic fairness and address corporate excess. He suggested that tackling these disparities is essential to restoring confidence in the economy and preventing further polarization. The study, conducted by the High Pay Centre, highlights that 66 FTSE 100 firms raised their chief executives' pay packages in the most recent reporting period, an increase from 61% of firms doing so the previous year. The total amount allocated to FTSE 100 executives amounted to £856.6 million, with £550.4 million specifically directed towards chief executives. This includes base salaries, bonuses, stock options, and other incentives. Some pay-setting committees within large corporations justify the high levels of executive compensation by citing the need to attract and retain top talent. They argue that competitive pay is necessary to remain attractive to skilled professionals and to match the practices of international competitors, particularly in the United States and among privately owned firms. The High Pay Centre proposes several measures to address the imbalance, including the introduction of a "fat cat tax." Under this proposal, companies would face a corporation tax surcharge on their profits if a single executive's pay exceeds a certain multiple of the median UK worker's salary. The initial threshold would be set at 10 times, with progressively higher taxes applied at multiples of 50, 100, 200, and 500 times the median wage. The organization suggests that such a policy could generate revenue to fund initiatives aimed at reducing inequality, such as investments in education and early childhood programs. Additionally, the think tank advocates for broader reforms, including greater employee representation on corporate boards and more transparent disclosure of pay structures in annual reports. These changes aim to enhance accountability and ensure that pay decisions reflect the interests of all stakeholders rather than just a select few. Among the highest-paid executives in the FTSE 100 were Pascal Soriot of AstraZeneca, earning £17.7 million, followed by Emma Walmsley of GlaxoSmithKline, who earned £15.7 million before leaving her position. Other notable figures include C.S. Venkatakrishnan of Barclays, Wael Sawan of Shell, and Bill Winters of Standard Chartered.
1 reports
Daily MirrorIndependentProgressiveFactual 92Objective 752 days ago Average fatcat's annual pay hits record £5million - 130 times what a typical UK workers earnsResearch by the High Pay Centre reveals that the average CEO of a UK-based FTSE 100 company earned £5 million annually in 2025/26, a figure representing 130 times the earnings of a typical UK worker. This marks an increase from 124 times the average worker's pay in the prior year and represents an eight-year high. The report highlights that executive pay has grown significantly faster than wages for ordinary employees, with a 8.6% rise in executive compensation compared to a 3.6% increase for average workers. Andrew Speke of the High Pay Centre called for greater attention to economic fairness and warned that unchecked inequality could fuel support for right-wing populism. The organization also proposed a 'fat cat tax'—a surcharge on corporations whose executives earn excessively relative to average workers—to address income disparity.
Bias read (Progressive): The article emphasizes growing income inequality between corporate executives and average workers, criticizes rising executive pay, and proposes progressive taxation measures ('fat cat tax') to address disparities. These points align with left-leaning concerns about economic fairness and wealth gaps
Why factuality (92): The article provides specific figures (130 times more than average worker, £5 million annual pay) and cites the High Pay Centre as the source. The increase from 124 times last year and the 8.6% rise from 2024/25 are included. These details align with the cross-source consensus, though the mention of
Why objectivity (75): The article uses emotionally charged terms like 'fatcat' and 'corporate excess,' which may influence reader perception. While it quotes Andrew Speke and mentions the potential impact on public trust and politics, it leans toward emphasizing the negative consequences of income disparity rather than p
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
Become a Supporter