Super funds in Australia have recorded another exceptional year, delivering robust returns for investors in both the accumulation and pension phases. For the financial year ending 2026, the median one-year return for growth funds, those with 61 to 80 percent of assets allocated to growth options, stood at 9.5 percent for accumulation funds and 10.8 percent for pension funds. This marks the fourth consecutive year of returns exceeding 9 percent, a feat achieved only once before in the history of the superannuation industry, during the period 2004–07, which included two negative years. The performance was largely driven by strong returns from international equities, especially for funds employing effective currency hedging strategies. These measures helped mitigate risks associated with fluctuating exchange rates, allowing funds to maintain high returns despite global market volatility. The success of these strategies highlights the importance of diversification and risk management in achieving sustained investment outcomes. Among the standout performers in the accumulation phase, Unisuper led the pack with a 12.3 percent return, followed by a close contest between NGS Super Diversified and CFS Firstchoice Growth Fund, each reporting 11.5 percent returns. In the pension phase, Unisuper again topped the list with a 13.1 percent return. Hostplus Balanced Fund placed third in the accumulation category with 10.8 percent, while AMP Balanced Fund ranked third in the pension phase with 11.9 percent. When looking beyond the one-year horizon, the cumulative performance of growth funds over the past four years reveals even more impressive figures. Accumulation-phase funds have generated a median return of 44 percent, representing some of the most consistent returns in the history of the superannuation sector. This consistency underscores the resilience of well-managed investment portfolios amid economic uncertainties. Despite these positive results, experts caution against complacency. One-year returns, while encouraging, are not indicative of long-term trends. Chant West's Head of Super Investment, Mano Mohankumar, emphasized that the current level of returns should not be considered the norm. Instead, he pointed to the typical long-term goal for growth funds, to outperform inflation by approximately 3.5 percent annually, translating to around 6 percent on average. This target reflects a more realistic expectation for sustainable investment performance over extended periods. For retirees relying on their superannuation income, the emphasis is on long-term planning rather than short-term gains. While the recent performance has been remarkable, it is essential to consider historical patterns and potential future fluctuations. The past four years' returns stand out as an anomaly, and investors must remain cautious about assuming similar results will persist indefinitely. Looking ahead, the focus will likely shift toward evaluating the sustainability of these returns and exploring strategies that balance growth with risk mitigation. As the superannuation landscape continues to evolve, ongoing monitoring and strategic adjustments will be critical for maintaining investor confidence and ensuring long-term financial security.
3 reports
The AgeIndependentCenter3 hr. agoThe article discusses the strong performance of Australian superannuation funds over recent years, highlighting that growth funds achieved median returns of 9.5% for accumulation phase funds and 10.8% for pension phase funds in fiscal year 2025-26. This marks the fourth consecutive year of strong returns, primarily driven by international share investments and effective currency hedging. The top-performing fund was Unisuper, which returned 12.3% on accumulation and 13.1% on pension funds. Over a four-year period, growth funds in the accumulation phase delivered median returns of 44%, showcasing consistency. However, the article cautions against relying solely on short-term gains and emphasizes the importance of long-term planning, noting that 10-year returns for growth funds show more sustainable performance.
Bias read (Center): While the article focuses on financial performance and economic trends, it does not present a clear ideological slant. The discussion remains focused on factual data and expert analysis rather than promoting specific political agendas. The tone is balanced, emphasizing both the achievements of super
The Sydney Morning HeraldIndependentCenter3 hr. agoThe article discusses the strong performance of Australian superannuation funds over recent years, highlighting that growth options within super funds achieved median returns of 9.5% for accumulation funds and 10.8% for pension funds in the fiscal year 2025-26. This marks the fourth consecutive year of strong returns, primarily driven by international share investments and effective currency hedging. The article notes that pension funds typically perform better due to tax-free status in retirement. Unisuper led with 12.3% returns on accumulation and 13.1% on pension funds, while other funds like NGS Super Diversified and CFS Firstchoice Growth Fund also performed well. Over four years, growth funds in accumulation phase showed median returns of 44%, indicating consistency. However, the article cautions against relying solely on short-term gains and emphasizes the importance of long-term planning, citing 10-year returns as a better indicator of sustained performance.
Bias read (Center): While the article discusses financial performance and economic trends, which could be considered politically relevant, it does not overtly favor any particular political ideology or agenda. The focus is on factual reporting of superannuation fund performance and advice for investors, without takinga
news.com.auIndependentProgressiveyesterdayThe article discusses Treasurer Jim Chalmers' proposal to treat Australians' superannuation savings as a 'national asset,' which would require employers to contribute more to employees' retirement funds. This initiative aims to address income inequality and ensure long-term financial security for retirees. The idea has sparked debate among policymakers and industry experts, with some supporting the move as a necessary step toward greater economic fairness and others expressing concerns about potential impacts on business costs and investment returns.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the proposal as a progressive measure aimed at reducing inequality and enhancing social welfare, emphasizing its role in securing financial stability for all Australians. It highlights support from left-leaning political figures and focuses on the broader societal benefits rather
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
Become a Supporter
Australia
