ON
← Back to feed
One choice is better for your brain, science explains why
Serbia🔬 Science3 days ago

One choice is better for your brain, science explains why

A study by Professor Ryuta Kawashima from Tohoku University suggests that manually shifting gears in a car activates the prefrontal cortex of the brain, which is involved in attention, memory, and decision-making. This manual engagement helps maintain cognitive functions as people age. The article highlights that driving a manual transmission requires constant coordination between observing traffic, pressing the clutch, shifting gears, and controlling acceleration, keeping drivers mentally active compared to automatic transmissions. While some view manual transmissions as outdated or inconvenient, the research emphasizes their potential benefits for brain health.

Go to the primary sources (1)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

1 reports

Blic logoBlicIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 703 days ago
One choice is better for your brain, science explains why

A study by Professor Ryuta Kawashima from Tohoku University suggests that manually shifting gears in a car activates the prefrontal cortex of the brain, which is involved in attention, memory, and decision-making. This manual engagement helps maintain cognitive functions as people age. The article highlights that driving a manual transmission requires constant coordination between observing traffic, pressing the clutch, shifting gears, and controlling acceleration, keeping drivers mentally active compared to automatic transmissions. While some view manual transmissions as outdated or inconvenient, the research emphasizes their potential benefits for brain health.

Bias read (Center): The article discusses scientific findings related to brain activity and does not present any political opinions, biases, or controversial viewpoints. It focuses purely on the neurological benefits of manual gear-shifting without taking a stance on political issues.

Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 70): The article accurately reports the study by Ryuta Kawashima and aligns with the primary source document. It mentions the activation of the prefrontal cortex and cognitive benefits of manual shifting. However, it uses emotionally charged terms like 'masochist' and 'romanticus', which may bias the rea

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories