The Icelandic government has taken additional steps to increase its involvement in the general housing market, as outlined in a proposal submitted by Ragnar Þór Ingólfsson, Minister of Industries and Housing. The proposal was approved by the Althing on Monday and aims to raise the state's share in construction costs for rental housing projects from 18% to up to 23%. Additionally, the supplementary contribution for rental properties owned by municipalities for students or public servants will rise from 4% to 5%. This measure is part of a broader housing package introduced by the government, intended to enable non-profit rental companies to build more housing units. The new contributions will take effect once the relevant construction cost figures become available, starting from November 2025.
Supporters of the proposal, including members of the ruling coalition parties, voted in favor of the bill, while the Center Party opposed it. Members of the Progressive Party and the Independence Party supported the proposal. During the voting process, there was considerable debate over the issue. Guðrún Hafsteinsdóttir, leader of the Independence Party, stated that the problem in the housing market lies in slower growth rather than increased government spending. She criticized the government’s efforts to make more people renters instead of property owners. Ragnar Þór claimed this was only part of the government’s measures and announced that further changes would be presented soon, including significant simplifications to building regulations and planning procedures. He expressed disbelief that the opposition would resist providing some support to the construction sector and workers.
There appears to be a strong expectation that parliamentary sessions will conclude on Tuesday as planned. Sigríður Á. Andersen, leader of the Center Party, noted that several government proposals have been regularly brought before parliament this session. She mentioned that sufficient work had already been done during the final days of the session, and it seems likely that the parliamentary term will end as scheduled. On Tuesday, among other things, a vote took place regarding the housing package proposed by the government. After the afternoon session, discussions included the establishment of a new joint venture and the payment of special interest reserves into the main housing loan fund. In the evening news broadcast on Sýn, Andersen and Ólaf Adolfsson, leader of the Independence Party, discussed the parliamentary agenda and issues to be addressed on Tuesday.
Andersen highlighted the Center Party’s proposal concerning the validity period of driving licenses, which was put forward by Nönnu Margrét Gunnlaugsdóttur. The proposal seeks to reduce the number of requests for license renewals from twelve times to four, aligning with current legislation. She emphasized that this issue affects individuals over sixty years old and noted that it enjoys broad cross-party support. She expressed hope that the proposal would be accepted in the early stages of discussion. Meanwhile, the Independence Party’s proposal regarding stamp duties is also on the agenda for Tuesday. Ólaf Adolfsson described stamp duties as a crucial matter for those investing in residential real estate. While he hoped for potential government support, he acknowledged the possibility of resistance. Andersen remarked that this session has seen a variety of government proposals being brought forward, requiring substantial work within committees. She suggested that future government proposals should be better prepared so they do not require last-minute adjustments in the final days of the session.
Regarding the likelihood of the parliament concluding its work before the national referendum on continued membership in the European Union takes place, Andersen indicated that if such a reason arises, the Foreign Affairs Committee could be convened at any time, provided a quarter of its members agree. She confirmed that if such a need arises, it would be acted upon accordingly.
According to a recent survey conducted by Maskín, nearly half of the residents of Reykjavík were dissatisfied with the decision made by Hildur Björnsdóttir to form a majority coalition with the Center Party. The survey, carried out between June 2 and 11, received responses from 781 participants. Data was collected based on statistics from Statistics Iceland regarding gender, age, and education. Respondents were asked to rate their satisfaction levels as very satisfied, fairly satisfied, average, fairly dissatisfied, or very dissatisfied.
The survey revealed significantly higher expectations for Hildur Björnsdóttir compared to Heiða Bjarga Hilmisdóttur, who previously held the position of mayor. Approximately 46.1 percent of respondents expressed either high or very high expectations for the new majority coalition, compared to about one-quarter who felt similarly about the previous administration. Many Reykjavík residents appear to be discontented with Hildur's decision to seek a middle ground in forming the majority coalition. Hildur initiated talks with four parties that did not belong to the former majority coalition, eventually forming a three-party coalition consisting of the Independence Party, the Progressive Party, and the Renewal Party.
According to the survey results, approximately 58.6 percent of Reykjavík residents expressed either moderate or very low satisfaction with the existing majority coalition comprising the Independence Party and the Center Party. At the same time, about twenty-nine percent of residents expressed satisfaction with the current coalition. Notably, this level of satisfaction is lower than the percentage of votes these parties received in the elections, where they collectively obtained 44.3 percent of the vote.
Significant discussion surrounded the direction in which the candidates would pursue when forming the majority coalition, both before and after the municipal elections. For instance, Björg Magnúsdóttir was initially hesitant but later decided to cooperate with the Center Party ahead of the election. Under Hildur Björnsdóttir, tensions quickly arose after the election results were announced, clearly showing her strong position. Among other things, messages were sent from Center Party members suggesting that Independence Party members should stop being too small and instead unite with the Center Party under one banner.
The satisfaction level with the newly formed three-party coalition under Hildur Björnsdóttir shows more satisfaction than dissatisfaction. Specifically, 17.4 percent of Reykjavík residents are very satisfied, and 24 percent are fairly satisfied. However, around one-third of residents, or 32.9 percent, are dissatisfied with the new coalition. About a quarter remain in the average satisfaction category.
Expectations for Hildur Björnsdóttir as mayor of Reykjavík are somewhat limited, with 27.1 percent expressing very high expectations for her. Another 20.9 percent have relatively high expectations, while 28.5 percent hold low expectations for her.
4 reports
RÚV FréttirState / PublicProgressiveFactual 95Objective 8818 days ago Increase in government contribution to public housingThe Icelandic government has approved an increase in land taxes for private residential properties, raising the rate from 18% to up to 23% of the property's value. The change is part of a housing package aimed at enabling non-profit rental companies to build more homes. The new tax will take effect from November 2025. The ruling parties supported the proposal, while the Center Party opposed it. Members of the Progressive Party and Independence Party voted in favor. Guðrún Hafsteinsdóttir, leader of the Independence Party, stated that the housing market issue lies in lower growth rather than an
Bias read (Progressive): The article highlights opposition from the Center Party and quotes the Independence Party leader criticizing the government's approach, suggesting a focus on market growth over increased state spending. The framing emphasizes the expansion of non-profit housing and critiques the government’s policy,
Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 88): This article reports on legislative decisions with clear factual content, citing specific percentages and policy changes. It maintains a relatively objective tone while providing context on political positions.
VísirIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 8518 days ago Parliament's work to be completed tomorrowThe article discusses upcoming parliamentary sessions in Iceland, focusing on key issues such as housing packages, changes to driving license renewal requirements, and discussions around property taxes. Representatives from the Independence Party and the Center Party express optimism about the progress of these matters. The article mentions specific proposals, including reducing the frequency of driving license renewals from 12 to four times for those over 60 years old, and highlights ongoing debates on property tax reforms.
Bias read (Center): The article provides balanced coverage of political developments without overtly favoring any side. It reports on statements from both the Independence Party and the Center Party representatives, presenting their positions neutrally. There is no evident editorializing, loaded language, or one-sideds
Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 85): Similar to article 0, this piece covers parliamentary actions and quotes from officials. It appears factually sound and consistent with other sources, maintaining a neutral stance overall.
VísirIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 8518 days ago Bjørnson to finish Parliament's work tomorrowThe article discusses the upcoming conclusion of parliamentary sessions in Iceland, focusing on key issues set to be addressed. Representatives from the Independence Party and the Center Party express optimism about the session ending as planned. Topics include housing package proposals by the government, discussions on reducing the renewal frequency of driving licenses from 12 to four times for those over 60, and debates on stamp duty affecting property investments.
Bias read (Center): The article provides balanced coverage of multiple political parties' positions without overtly favoring any side. It reports on policy proposals and statements from both the Independence Party and the Center Party without editorializing or using biased language.
Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 85): The article provides detailed information about parliamentary proceedings, including specific proposals and statements from politicians. The facts align with the cross-source consensus, though some details may be slightly speculative. The tone remains mostly neutral.
VísirIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 8014 days ago Half dissatisfied with Hildur's choice of the Centre PartyA survey by Maskínu indicates that nearly half of Reykjavík residents were dissatisfied with the decision by Hildur Björnsdóttir, the leader of the Independence Party, to form a coalition with the Center Party (Miðflokkurinn), creating a majority government. The survey, conducted between June 2 and 11, involved 781 respondents and found that 58.6% of Reykjavík residents expressed either moderate or strong dissatisfaction with the new governing coalition of the Independence Party and the Center Party. In contrast, only 29% expressed satisfaction with the new coalition, which received 44.3% of the vote in recent municipal elections. The survey highlights significant discontent among voters regarding the formation of this three-party coalition, which includes the Independence Party, the Progressive Party (Framsóknarflokkurinn), and the Renewal Party (Viðreisn). Despite this, Hildur remains a popular choice for mayor, with 27.1% expressing strong support for her leadership.
Bias read (Center): The article presents survey data objectively, highlighting both positive and negative reactions to the political decisions made by Hildur Björnsdóttir. It does not favor any particular political side but rather reports the findings of the survey and contextualizes them within the broader political局势
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 80): The article presents survey data and public opinion regarding political preferences. While the facts seem accurate based on the cross-source consensus, there is a slight leaning towards presenting the results in a way that emphasizes certain outcomes over others.
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
Become a Supporter