ON
← Back to feed
Offering to LVMH: Dangerous surveillance tool spreads
Germany🏛️ PoliticsProgressive12 days ago

Offering to LVMH: Dangerous surveillance tool spreads

Ein Artikel von netzpolitik.org untersucht die Verbreitung von Überwachungstechnologien, die aus Werbedaten stammen, und stellt fest, dass solche Werkzeuge nicht nur von staatlichen Behörden, sondern auch von privaten Unternehmen genutzt werden können. Die Technologie, bekannt als ADINT (werbebasierte Aufklärung), wird von Firmen wie Penlink entwickelt und ermöglicht die Ortung von Mobilgeräten mit hoher Präzision. Eine Recherche des französischen Medienunternehmens Mediapart ergab, dass das Tool Webloc, eines der Produkte von Penlink, kürzlich einem Luxusgüterkonzern namens LVMH angeboten wurde, um Diebstähle zu untersuchen. Obwohl LVMH bestätigte, dass ein Dienstleister eine „neue Technologie“ präsentierte, blieben Details zur Funktion und zum Einsatz von Webloc unklar, da Penlink keine Rückfragen beantwortete. Experten warnen vor der Legalität solcher Praktiken unter Berücksichtigung der DSGVO.

A French luxury conglomerate, LVMH, has reportedly been presented with a surveillance tool capable of tracking mobile devices worldwide using data collected from the advertising industry. The tool, known as Webloc, is developed by Penlink, a U.S.-based company specializing in location-based intelligence. According to reports from German media outlet netzpolitik.org, which corroborated findings from French publication Mediapart, the technology could enable private companies, including LVMH, to monitor individuals based on their movement patterns, potentially with precision down to several meters. The system operates under the umbrella of ADINT, or Advertising-Based Intelligence, a term used to describe the collection and analysis of mobile device location data gathered through popular apps. These data flow through the ad ecosystem and are sold to firms like Penlink via data brokers. Legal experts argue that such practices violate the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), as users are not typically aware of or have consented to the use of their location data for this purpose. Previously, Webloc had been used by government agencies, including the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), as well as authorities in Hungary and Austria. However, its potential application by private entities remained unclear until recently. A report by Mediapart revealed that Webloc was introduced to a French luxury group, LVMH, through a private security firm. This came amid ongoing investigations into theft cases within one of LVMH's subsidiaries. LVMH, which owns brands such as Louis Vuitton and Moët & Chandon, responded to inquiries from netzpolitik.org. It stated that in the previous year, theft incidents occurred at one of its properties, and police were still investigating. The company confirmed that it had engaged a private security firm to address these concerns. Through this firm, a service provider presented a “new technology” to LVMH. The service provider, according to internal communications, was Penlink, and the technology in question was Webloc. In its response, LVMH emphasized that it was not informed about the underlying technology or its functionality during initial discussions. The company conducted a test to evaluate the proposed solution, but it was not made aware of the specific capabilities of Webloc. Once LVMH understood the nature of the proposal, it immediately terminated further conversations and did not pursue the offer further. The company noted that it had no access to reports, conclusions, or data generated from the test and was unaware of any resulting information. The potential use of ADINT tools like Webloc for criminal investigations raises ethical and legal questions. While tracking stolen goods or identifying suspects might seem justified, the method relies on data harvested without user knowledge or consent. In April, the Citizen Lab at the University of Toronto published a report detailing Webloc’s ability to track devices based on their locations, highlighting the risks associated with such technologies. Despite the controversy surrounding Webloc, LVMH maintains that it did not adopt the tool. The company’s stance underscores growing awareness among businesses of the implications of using surveillance technologies derived from non-consensual data collection. As more organizations grapple with the balance between security and privacy, the role of private security firms in facilitating access to such tools becomes increasingly scrutinized.

Go to the primary sources (4)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

1 reports

netzpolitik.org logonetzpolitik.orgIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 7512 days ago
Offering to LVMH: Dangerous surveillance tool spreads

Ein Artikel von netzpolitik.org untersucht die Verbreitung von Überwachungstechnologien, die aus Werbedaten stammen, und stellt fest, dass solche Werkzeuge nicht nur von staatlichen Behörden, sondern auch von privaten Unternehmen genutzt werden können. Die Technologie, bekannt als ADINT (werbebasierte Aufklärung), wird von Firmen wie Penlink entwickelt und ermöglicht die Ortung von Mobilgeräten mit hoher Präzision. Eine Recherche des französischen Medienunternehmens Mediapart ergab, dass das Tool Webloc, eines der Produkte von Penlink, kürzlich einem Luxusgüterkonzern namens LVMH angeboten wurde, um Diebstähle zu untersuchen. Obwohl LVMH bestätigte, dass ein Dienstleister eine „neue Technologie“ präsentierte, blieben Details zur Funktion und zum Einsatz von Webloc unklar, da Penlink keine Rückfragen beantwortete. Experten warnen vor der Legalität solcher Praktiken unter Berücksichtigung der DSGVO.

Bias read (Progressive): Die Berichterstattung betont die Risiken und ethischen Bedenken hinsichtlich der Nutzung von Werbedaten für Überwachungszwecke, insbesondere durch private Unternehmen. Es wird kritisiert, dass solche Technologien, die ursprünglich für Werbezwecke erhoben wurden, nun für staatliche und private Überwå

Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports on the findings from Mediapart's investigation into Webloc being offered to private companies like LVMH. It references the primary source document and corroborates details about the technology, its origins, and the specific case with Moët Hennessy. However, it omits so

Why objectivity (75): The tone is somewhat alarmist, using phrases like 'gefährliches Überwachungs-Werkzeug' which implies a negative judgment. While it presents facts neutrally, the emphasis on privacy concerns and legal issues suggests a slight editorial bias toward criticizing the use of such tools.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories