ON
← Back to feed
Uber: €825 million penalty for rushing to make a decision
Germany🏛️ PoliticsCenteryesterday

Uber: €825 million penalty for rushing to make a decision

The Dutch data protection authority, Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens (AP), has imposed a record fine of €825 million on Uber for violating Article 22 of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). The violation involved the unauthorized use of fully automated algorithms to deactivate drivers between 2018 and 2022 without human review. This practice led to sudden income loss for drivers, which the authority deemed unacceptable under GDPR rules protecting individuals from significant automated decisions. The decision stems from a complaint by a French human rights organization representing 170 Uber drivers. Uber has previously faced multiple fines from the AP, including €600,000 in 2018, €10 million in 2023, and €290 million in 2024, all related to driver rights and data handling practices. Uber has appealed this latest ruling.

The Netherlands' data protection authority has imposed a record fine of €824,990,000 on ride-hailing company Uber for violating key provisions of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). This penalty marks the second-largest individual fine issued under GDPR since its implementation eight years ago. The decision was made by the Dutch Authority for Personal Data (Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens, AP), which oversees compliance with data protection laws in the Netherlands and handles cases involving Uber's European headquarters. According to the AP, Uber violated Article 22 of the GDPR between 2018 and 2022 by allowing fully automated decisions to be made without human oversight. The regulation prohibits such automated decisions, particularly those with significant consequences for individuals, as they can lead to unfair outcomes. In this case, Uber’s system automatically deactivated drivers based on an analysis of their driving behavior, customer ratings, and other data collected from both drivers and users. These actions were carried out without further review, leaving drivers without income overnight. Monique Verdier, deputy head of the AP, emphasized that such decisions should have been reviewed by a person before being implemented. The fine follows a long-standing investigation into potential violations of European data protection law by Uber. A French human rights organization initially brought the case forward after 170 Uber drivers reported concerns. The complaint was forwarded to France’s data protection authority, the CNIL, which determined that the issue fell under the jurisdiction of the Netherlands due to Uber’s European headquarters. The case eventually reached the Dutch authorities, who found sufficient grounds for action. This is not the first time Uber has faced penalties from the AP. Previously, the agency had fined the company €600,000 in 2018 for failing to provide drivers with access to their personal data, and €10 million in 2023 for improperly transferring driver data to the United States without proper legal basis. Uber has challenged these earlier fines through legal means, and court decisions are still pending. Similarly, the company has already filed legal appeals against the latest record fine. If upheld, the €824.990,000 fine would place Uber among the top recipients of GDPR-related penalties. It would rank behind Meta’s €1.2 billion fine, issued by Ireland’s data protection authority in 2023, and ahead of TikTok’s €530 million penalty, also issued by the Irish regulator. The AP has confirmed that the current fine relates specifically to the rights of Uber drivers and does not involve user data misuse, which was the focus of previous investigations. The AP has stated that Uber has modified its practices in the EU following the ruling, though the exact nature of these changes remains undisclosed. The case highlights the increasing scrutiny of tech companies operating within the European Union, particularly regarding how they handle sensitive data and make decisions affecting individuals. As legal challenges continue, the outcome of this case could set important precedents for future enforcement of GDPR rules.

1 reports

heise online logoheise onlineIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 78yesterday
Uber: €825 million penalty for rushing to make a decision

The Dutch data protection authority, Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens (AP), has imposed a record fine of €825 million on Uber for violating Article 22 of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). The violation involved the unauthorized use of fully automated algorithms to deactivate drivers between 2018 and 2022 without human review. This practice led to sudden income loss for drivers, which the authority deemed unacceptable under GDPR rules protecting individuals from significant automated decisions. The decision stems from a complaint by a French human rights organization representing 170 Uber drivers. Uber has previously faced multiple fines from the AP, including €600,000 in 2018, €10 million in 2023, and €290 million in 2024, all related to driver rights and data handling practices. Uber has appealed this latest ruling.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual account of the legal proceedings against Uber, citing the Dutch data protection authority and referencing the GDPR regulations. It does not exhibit overtly biased language, nor does it favor one side over another. The information is based on official findings and legal

Why factuality (85): The article reports on a fine imposed by the Dutch Data Protection Authority (AP) against Uber for violating GDPR Article 22 regarding automated decision-making. It cites specific details such as the amount of the fine (€824.99 million), the timeframe (2018–2022), and the nature of the violation (au

Why objectivity (78): The article presents the facts neutrally but includes quotes from officials like Monique Verdier, which may introduce some subjective interpretation. While it does not overtly take sides, the emphasis on the severity of the violation and the consequences for drivers could be seen as slightly leaning

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories