ON
← Back to feed
In the light of the foregoing, the Commission has decided to initiate proceedings under Article 93 (2) of the EC Treaty in respect of the application of Article 93 (2) of the EC Treaty.
Italy🏛️ PoliticsCenter21 hr. ago

In the light of the foregoing, the Commission has decided to initiate proceedings under Article 93 (2) of the EC Treaty in respect of the application of Article 93 (2) of the EC Treaty.

The Italian Constitutional Court has ruled that the parliamentary challenge against Giusi Bartolozzi is admissible. Bartolozzi, former chief of staff to Justice Minister Carlo Nordio, is under investigation for providing false information to the Tribunal of Ministers regarding the case of Libyan torturer Mohamed Almasri, who was arrested in Italy but later released by the government. In April, the Chamber of Deputies voted to extend parliamentary immunity to Bartolozzi, similar to that granted to Nordio, Interior Minister Matteo Piantedosi, and Deputy Prime Minister Alfredo Mantovano. Deputies argued that judges should have sought authorization to proceed against Bartolozzi, considering her involvement in the alleged favoritism towards Nordio. The Tribunal of Ministers had previously deemed her testimony 'inattentive and deceitful' and ordered direct citation to trial, but the process remains suspended pending resolution of the attribution conflict. Today’s ruling concerns only the procedural admissibility of the appeal, while the substantive merits will be decided in a future hearing. The court confirmed that the Chamber is legally entitled to propose the conflict to protect its职权

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

3 reports

Il Fatto Quotidiano logoIl Fatto QuotidianoIndependentCenter21 hr. ago
In the light of the foregoing, the Commission has decided to initiate proceedings under Article 93 (2) of the EC Treaty in respect of the application of Article 93 (2) of the EC Treaty.

The Italian Constitutional Court has ruled that the parliamentary challenge against Giusi Bartolozzi is admissible. Bartolozzi, former chief of staff to Justice Minister Carlo Nordio, is under investigation for providing false information to the Tribunal of Ministers regarding the case of Libyan torturer Mohamed Almasri, who was arrested in Italy but later released by the government. In April, the Chamber of Deputies voted to extend parliamentary immunity to Bartolozzi, similar to that granted to Nordio, Interior Minister Matteo Piantedosi, and Deputy Prime Minister Alfredo Mantovano. Deputies argued that judges should have sought authorization to proceed against Bartolozzi, considering her involvement in the alleged favoritism towards Nordio. The Tribunal of Ministers had previously deemed her testimony 'inattentive and deceitful' and ordered direct citation to trial, but the process remains suspended pending resolution of the attribution conflict. Today’s ruling concerns only the procedural admissibility of the appeal, while the substantive merits will be decided in a future hearing. The court confirmed that the Chamber is legally entitled to propose the conflict to protect its职权

Bias read (Center): The article presents the legal proceedings and constitutional arguments without overt ideological slant. It reports both the parliamentary defense of Bartolozzi and the judicial stance against her, maintaining balance between the competing interests of the legislative branch and the judiciary.

Open logoOpenIndependentCenter22 hr. ago
In the Bartolozzi case, the Consulta declares admissible the conflict of attribution raised by the Chamber: first victory for the centre-right

The Italian Constitutional Court has declared the conflict of jurisdiction raised by the Chamber of Deputies against the Collegio per i Reati Ministeriali and the Prosecutor’s Office of Rome as admissible. The case involves Giusi Bartolozzi, former chief of staff to Justice Minister Carlo Nordio, who was investigated for providing false information to prosecutors in the Almasri case—a case involving Libyan general arrested in Italy. The Chamber argues that Bartolozzi’s position is 'teleologically connected' to the crimes committed by Nordio and other ministers already examined by Parliament, thus requiring parliamentary approval before legal action. While the court did not determine who is correct, it confirmed the conflict can proceed. This marks a potential victory for the center-right majority, which believes the prosecutor’s office bypassed parliamentary oversight.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the positions of both the Chamber of Deputies (center-right) and the Prosecution without overtly favoring either side. It reports the court's procedural ruling without taking a stance on the substantive merits of the dispute. The framing remains balanced between the two parties,

ANSA logoANSAIndependentCenter22 hr. ago
Consultation, admissibility of the conflict of powers for Bartolozzi in the Almasri case

The Italian Constitutional Court has declared admissible a conflict of powers between state authorities initiated by the Chamber of Deputies against the Collegio per i Reati Ministeriali and the Public Prosecutor's Office in Rome. The case concerns the failure to request authorization to proceed from the Chamber of Deputies regarding the crime alleged against Giusi Bartolozzi, who was then the head of cabinet of the Justice Minister. The court's decision allows the case to move forward, with a public hearing scheduled to address both procedural and substantive aspects.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a legal development concerning the separation of powers within the Italian government. It reports on a constitutional court ruling without overtly favoring any political side. The framing remains neutral, focusing on the procedural status of the case rather than taking a stance.

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories