Former Vice President Atiku Abubakar has rejected allegations made by former Secretary to the Government of the Federation, Babachir Lawal, regarding the conduct of the African Democratic Congress (ADC) presidential primary. Atiku described the allegations as being driven by bitterness, conjecture, and political revisionism rather than genuine concern for the public interest. Atiku’s Senior Special Assistant on Public Communication, Phrank Shaibu, stated that Lawal made serious accusations during a televised interview but provided no verifiable evidence to support them. The statement indicated
In a high-stakes political dispute unfolding within Nigeria's African Democratic Congress (ADC), former Vice President Atiku Abubakar has strongly rejected allegations raised by former Secretary to the Government of the Federation (SGF), Babachir Lawal, regarding alleged irregularities in the ADC presidential primary. These allegations, which surfaced shortly after Lawal's resignation from the party, have sparked a heated exchange between two prominent figures in Nigerian politics. Atiku's camp has consistently denied the claims, asserting that they are based more on personal grievances than factual evidence.
The controversy began when Lawal, who had previously served as the SGF under President Muhammadu Buhari, stepped down from the ADC amid accusations of electoral misconduct. During a televised interview, Lawal expressed concerns about the fairness of the primary process, suggesting that Atiku had manipulated the outcome to secure the nomination. His comments came at a time when the ADC was preparing for its upcoming presidential campaign, with Atiku being the chosen candidate for the 2027 general election.
Atiku's team responded swiftly, dismissing Lawal's allegations as unfounded and rooted in bitterness rather than credible information. They emphasized that Lawal had failed to provide any tangible evidence to support his claims. According to Atiku's Senior Special Assistant on Public Communication, Phrank Shaibu, Lawal's statements were characterized by a lack of concrete data, with no documents, petitions, or recordings offered to substantiate the accusations against Atiku. This absence of evidence led to criticism that Lawal was engaging in speculative storytelling rather than presenting a legitimate case.
The situation escalated as Atiku's supporters highlighted what they viewed as inconsistencies in Lawal's narrative. They pointed out that Lawal had previously aligned with another candidate, Rotimi Amaechi, before the primary concluded, indicating that his criticisms might stem from personal disappointment rather than a genuine concern for the integrity of the electoral process. Furthermore, they suggested that Lawal's portrayal of Atiku as both politically insignificant and influential was contradictory and illogical.
Despite these allegations, Atiku's camp reiterated their belief in his extensive contributions to Nigeria's development, including his role in liberalizing the telecommunications sector and promoting economic reforms. They argued that such achievements speak volumes about Atiku's influence and relevance in Nigerian politics, countering Lawal's assertions that Atiku had done little to secure the ADC presidential ticket.
As the debate continues, the focus remains on whether Lawal will present any new evidence to support his claims or if his allegations will fade into the background of political discourse. Meanwhile, Atiku's supporters remain resolute in defending their leader's position, emphasizing that the facts and truth remain unaltered despite the ongoing controversy. The situation underscores the complex dynamics within the ADC and highlights the challenges faced by political leaders in maintaining transparency and trust amidst intense scrutiny and competition.
Atiku Abubakar's camp has rejected allegations by Babachir Lawal of irregularities in the African Democratic Congress (ADC) presidential primary, characterizing the claims as baseless and motivated by personal bitterness rather than facts.
Bias read (Center): The headline and text frame the dispute through one side's rebuttal, but this reflects the article's subject (a partisan exchange) rather than the outlet's own slant; no editorializing language is added by the reporter.
Former Vice President Atiku Abubakar, through his aide Phrank Shaibu, dismissed allegations by former SGF Babachir Lawal regarding the conduct of the African Democratic Congress (ADC) presidential primary, saying Lawal made grave accusations on a television interview without producing any verifiable evidence. The statement characterized Lawal as a disappointed political actor whose preferred candidate lost, noted he had openly campaigned for another aspirant, and pointed to alleged contradictions in his claims. Atiku's camp described the statement as its final response to the matter.
Bias read (Center): The piece reports a partisan rebuttal but is framed as straightforward attributed coverage of one side's statement; it relays Atiku's characterizations as quotes rather than asserting them, so the framing reflects the source's bias rather than the outlet's slant on Nigeria's domestic left-right axis.
Former Vice President Atiku Abubakar has rejected allegations made by former Secretary to the Government of the Federation, Babachir Lawal, regarding the conduct of the African Democratic Congress (ADC) presidential primary. Atiku described the allegations as being driven by bitterness, conjecture, and political revisionism rather than genuine concern for the public interest. Atiku’s Senior Special Assistant on Public Communication, Phrank Shaibu, stated that Lawal made serious accusations during a televised interview but provided no verifiable evidence to support them. The statement indicated
Bias read (Center): The article presents statements from both Atiku Abubakar and his spokesperson, Phrank Shaibu, without overtly favoring one side. It reports their responses to allegations made by Babachir Lawal, focusing on the lack of evidence provided by Lawal. There is no clear ideological framing or biased phras
Atiku Abubakar, the ADC presidential candidate and former Vice President, has dismissed allegations made by former Secretary to the Government of the Federation, Babachir Lawal, calling them 'bitterness without proof.' In a statement released through his Senior Special Assistant on Public Communication, Phrank Shaibu, Atiku criticized Lawal for making grave accusations during a televised interview without providing any verifiable evidence such as documents, petitions, result sheets, witness statements, or recordings. The statement emphasized that Lawal failed to present any substantiation for
Bias read (Center): The article presents both parties' positions without overtly favoring one side. It quotes Atiku Abubakar's response to allegations made by Babachir Lawal, without adding commentary or bias. The framing appears balanced, focusing on the lack of evidence provided by Lawal according to Atiku's camp.
Babachir Lawal, a former top Nigerian official, stated that former Vice President Atiku Abubakar did not actively campaign or work to secure the presidential nomination within the African Democratic Congress (ADC) party before becoming its candidate for the 2027 election. Lawal resigned from the ADC following the primary election and criticized Atiku's lack of visible effort compared to other candidates such as Rotimi Amaechi, who reportedly campaigned more aggressively.
Bias read (Right): The article presents a critical perspective toward Atiku Abubakar, suggesting he did not make sufficient efforts to secure the presidential nomination. This framing implies skepticism toward his leadership and campaign strategy, which aligns with a right-leaning viewpoint in the context of NigerianÂ
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
Become a Supporter
NG