The article explores the concept of political polarization by challenging traditional left-right ideological frameworks. It argues that society is not divided along a simple spectrum between 'progressive' (left) and 'conservative' (right) extremes, but rather exists on a continuum where one side represents a commitment to gradual societal improvement while the other advocates for radical transformation. The author critiques contemporary political movements, suggesting that leftist extremism often promotes revolution, violence, and the use of force, whereas the right emphasizes values, tradition, and national identity. Historical examples such as fascism and communism are discussed, highlighting how these ideologies were historically classified as left-wing despite their authoritarian nature. The piece questions modern political labels, arguing that many self-proclaimed centrists position themselves against perceived extreme positions, leading to increased polarization. The author concludes that this binary framework obscures the complexity of societal development and hinders meaningful understanding.
Bias read (Conservative): The article frames leftist ideology as promoting revolutionary, violent, and extremist behavior, contrasting it with the right’s emphasis on values and tradition. This aligns with conservative narratives that often portray left-wing politics as more radical and destabilizing. While the article does



![Vladimir Kozin: Witnessing Communism as I Know It [4]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=www.druzina.si%2Fstorage%2Fapp%2Fmedia%2FIvo%2520%25C5%25BDajdela%2FPARTIZANSKI%2520ZLO%25C4%258CINI%2520-%2520Notranjska%2Fcropped-images%2Fkozina-vladimir-anras-procesija-gregorij-rozman-blagoslov-z-najsvetejsim-31-5-1945-zaveza-126-uv-0-0-0-0-1787048020.jpg&w=3840&q=75&output=webp&we)

