The latest poll conducted by the Economist /YouGov reveals a stark divide in how Democrats view the United States compared to other nations. According to the findings, only 8 percent of Democrats consider America the “greatest” country on Earth, a sharp contrast to the 52 percent of Republicans who share that sentiment. The survey, carried out between June 19 and 22, 2026, included responses from 1,679 participants, and it comes ahead of the nation’s semiquincentennial celebration and the opening of the Great American State Fair on the National Mall. The data highlights a growing sense of disillusionment among some Democrats regarding national identity and pride, with a significant portion of respondents expressing skepticism about the country’s standing globally.
Among the surveyed groups, opinions varied widely. While 25 percent of all respondents believed the U.S. was “the greatest” country, 20 percent considered it “among the greatest,” and 12 percent deemed it “better than average.” Conversely, 12 percent thought the country was “worse than average,” with 9 percent describing it as “among the worst” and 4 percent as “the worst.” These figures underscore a complex landscape of national perception, influenced by political affiliation and personal experiences. Notably, a plurality of Democrats, 23 percent, viewed the U.S. negatively, indicating a potential shift in how certain segments of the population perceive the nation’s global role and values.
The survey also revealed notable differences among political ideologies and voter preferences. Among self-described liberals, 26 percent expressed that the U.S. was “worse than average,” whereas 53 percent of conservatives held the opposite view. Furthermore, the poll highlighted a disparity between supporters of different presidential candidates. Voters who had supported Kamala Harris in the 2024 election showed a higher percentage of those who saw the U.S. as “worse than average” compared to Trump supporters, who overwhelmingly identified the country as “the greatest.” This suggests that political alignment significantly influences perceptions of national greatness.
Political figures and commentators have responded to these findings, emphasizing the importance of addressing the sentiments reflected in the poll. Senator David McCormick, a Republican from Pennsylvania, has called for action to challenge Democratic views on issues that resonate broadly with the American public. He advocates for measures that force Democrats to confront positions that are generally accepted across political lines, suggesting that such efforts might help bridge the gap in national pride and unity.
Meanwhile, the ongoing political landscape shows signs of polarization and strategic maneuvering. As the 2026 primary season progresses, Republicans continue to favor candidates aligned with the MAGA movement, despite concerns about its appeal to a broader electorate. Democrats, on the other hand, remain divided on strategies for electoral success, with varying levels of support for candidates ranging from centrist figures to progressive voices. This divergence underscores the challenges each party faces in crafting a unified message that resonates with the electorate.
Additionally, the debate over foreign policy continues to influence both parties, with divisions over issues such as the relationship with Israel and Iran creating internal tensions. These discussions highlight the complexities of maintaining national cohesion amid differing viewpoints and priorities.
As the nation approaches pivotal moments in its political calendar, the interplay between public sentiment, political strategy, and national identity will likely shape the trajectory of upcoming elections and policy decisions. The findings from this poll serve as a reminder of the evolving nature of American identity and the challenges faced by leaders in navigating a fragmented political landscape.
9 reports
Breitbart NewsIndependentRightFactual 95Objective 805 days agoSenator David McCormick, a Pennsylvania Republican, emphasized the urgency of passing the SAVE America Act during an interview on 'The Alex Marlow Show.' He stated that the act would force Democrats to publicly defend their opposition to a position that he claims is supported by both Republicans and Democrats. The interview took place on a radio and television program hosted by Alex Marlow, who is the editor-in-chief of Breitbart News. The show is broadcasted through the Salem Radio Network and is available via multiple platforms including YouTube, Rumble, Apple Podcasts, and Spotify.
Bias read (Right): The article uses strong, emotionally charged language such as 'make the Democrats eat this' and frames the legislation as a necessary measure to force Democrats into defending a controversial stance. The framing suggests a clear ideological alignment with the Republican perspective and presents the議
Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 80): The article accurately reports Senator McCormick's statements about the SAVE America Act. It maintains a relatively neutral tone while presenting his perspective.
RealClearPoliticsIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 85yesterdayThe upcoming Senate elections in November are shaping up to be highly competitive, with Republicans currently holding an advantage or closely contesting the key states that are vital for Democratic victories. This suggests that the outcome of the election could hinge on a narrow margin in these critical regions. The battle for control of the Senate is likely to be intense, with both parties focusing their efforts on winning these pivotal states. The current polling indicates a tight race, which could lead to significant implications for the balance of power in Congress.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a neutral observation about the current state of the Senate races without overtly favoring either party. It notes the competitiveness of the races but does not employ biased language or selectively present information to support one side over the other.
Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 85): The article provides factual information about the current state of Senate races. It is neutral in tone and does not take sides in the political debate.
The New York Times (US)Independent🔒CenterFactual 90Objective 854 days agoThe article discusses growing internal divisions within both the Democratic and Republican parties in the United States over foreign policy issues, particularly regarding Israel and Iran. These debates are seen as having significant implications for the parties' performance in upcoming elections, including the 2028 presidential election. The piece raises questions about whether these disagreements signal a broader ideological shift within American politics. It highlights the potential impact of these tensions on the future direction of U.S. foreign policy and party strategies.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced view of the internal debates within both major political parties without overtly favoring one side. It frames the discussion around the potential for ideological change rather than taking a clear partisan stance. While it acknowledges the significance of the issue, it
Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 85): The article explores the division between Democrats and Republicans regarding Israel and Iran. It presents the situation objectively without taking sides.
PoliticoIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 805 days agoIn the lead-up to the 2026 midterm elections, the Republican Party is heavily aligned with former President Donald Trump and the MAGA movement, despite some setbacks in primary contests. Meanwhile, the Democratic Party is struggling with internal divisions over strategy and candidate selection. Republicans are fielding candidates who strongly align with Trump's ideology, while Democrats are choosing between establishment figures and progressive challengers. This dynamic raises questions about the viability of MAGA in competitive districts and the potential for a shift within the Republican Party. The outcomes of these races could influence the trajectory of both major parties heading into the 2028 presidential election.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced view of both parties' strategies and challenges without overtly favoring one side. It highlights the dominance of MAGA within the Republican Party and the internal conflicts within the Democratic Party without using biased language or selective sourcing.
Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 80): The article provides a balanced overview of the primary season, discussing both Republican and Democratic strategies. It remains objective in its analysis.
CBS News (US)IndependentRightFactual 85Objective 8014 hr. agoOne year after President Trump signed the 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act' (OBBBA), the law's effects on different groups are becoming clearer. The OBBBA extended tax cuts from the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, preserving the top individual tax rate at 37% for high-income earners, benefiting those making over $640,000 individually or $768,000 jointly. It also reduced federal spending on programs like Medicaid and food stamps to fund these tax cuts. While Republicans praise the law for economic relief and long-term growth, Democrats argue it disproportionately benefits the wealthy by cutting support for vulnerable populations. The analysis highlights varying impacts based on income, age, and reliance on federal aid, with some provisions taking effect later in 2026.
Bias read (Right): The article frames the OBBBA as beneficial to middle-class taxpayers and emphasizes Republican claims of economic relief and long-term growth. It cites a White House spokesperson and conservative think tanks, while presenting Democratic criticisms as opposing viewpoints. The emphasis on tax cuts for
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 80): The article discusses the impact of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act on different groups. It presents both Republican and Democratic perspectives fairly.
The HillIndependentLeftFactual 85Objective 80yesterdayPlanned Parenthood is set to resume receiving federal funding through Medicaid starting this Saturday, following the expiration of a Republican-led effort to block such funding. Last year, Republicans used the One Big Beautiful Bill Act to cut off Planned Parenthood's access to Medicaid funds, a move aimed at preventing the organization from using federal money for abortion services. This action was part of broader conservative efforts to restrict abortion access. However, the funding restriction was temporary and now ends as scheduled, allowing Planned Parenthood to once again participate in the Medicaid program. The resumption of funding could impact access to reproductive health services for low-income individuals.
Bias read (Left): The article frames the resumption of federal funding for Planned Parenthood as a positive development, highlighting the previous Republican actions as a 'long sought-after goal' of conservatives to 'defund' the organization. It does not provide balanced perspectives or counterarguments from the GOP,
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 80): The article reports on Planned Parenthood regaining federal funding. It provides factual information and remains neutral in its presentation.
Breitbart NewsIndependentRightFactual 80Objective 654 days ago Poll: Only 8 Percent of Democrats Consider America the 'Greatest' Country on EarthA recent survey conducted by the Economist/YouGov reveals significant differences in how Americans perceive their country's standing globally, particularly along partisan lines. Only 8% of Democrats consider the United States the 'greatest' country on earth, while 52% of Republicans hold this view. The survey indicates that a majority across all groups believe the U.S. is at least better than average, but opinions diverge sharply between political parties. Among Democrats, 23% describe the U.S. as 'worse than average,' and 15% say it is 'among the worst.' In contrast, 53% of conservatives rate the U.S. as the 'greatest' country. The findings coincide with the lead-up to America's 250th anniversary celebrations and the start of the Great American State Fair.
Bias read (Right): The article emphasizes the stark contrast between Republican and Democratic views on national pride, highlighting the low percentage of Democrats who see the U.S. as the 'greatest' country. It uses phrases like 'stunningly' to emphasize the disparity, and focuses heavily on Republican perspectives,
Why these scores (Factual 80 · Objective 65): The article reports on a poll showing Democrats' perception of America. While it presents the data accurately, the framing emphasizes negative aspects of Democratic sentiment.
Breitbart NewsIndependentRightFactual 75Objective 50yesterday Donny Deutsch: 'Democrats Have Gone off the Rails'On Thursday's episode of MS NOW's 'Money, Power, Politics,' panelist Donny Deutsch criticized Democrats for promoting 'anti-American socialism' and failing to address economic concerns. Host Stephanie Ruhle asked whether voter dissatisfaction with Trump could shift support toward Democrats if the economy does not improve before November. Deutsch argued that Democrats are out of touch with mainstream values, focusing instead on issues like anti-Semitism and socialism. He cited recent Democratic candidates who allegedly supported pro-Hamas rhetoric and called for abolishing institutions such as ICE and prisons. Deutsch warned that these positions could harm the Democratic Party by giving Republicans ammunition to attack them.
Bias read (Right): The article frames Democrats as extreme and out-of-touch, using loaded terms like 'anti-American socialism' and 'socialistic' to describe their policies. It emphasizes the potential negative impact of these views on Democratic electoral prospects, suggesting a right-leaning perspective. The focus on
Why these scores (Factual 75 · Objective 50): The article accurately quotes Donny Deutsch's comments about Democrats going off the rails, but presents his views without sufficient balance or context. The tone leans heavily toward conservative criticism of Democrats.
SemaforIndependentRightFactual 60Objective 40yesterdayThe article reports that Republican lawmakers are planning strategies to resist investigations led by Democratic authorities. The focus is on efforts to counterprobe actions initiated by Democrats, suggesting potential legislative or procedural responses aimed at limiting the scope or impact of these inquiries.
Bias read (Right): The article frames Republican actions as proactive measures against Democratic investigations, implying a defensive stance. The emphasis on 'plot' suggests a narrative that portrays Republicans as actively working to undermine Democratic oversight, which aligns with a right-leaning perspective.
Why these scores (Factual 60 · Objective 40): The article makes a claim about Republican plotting against Democrat probes but lacks specific evidence or sources. The tone suggests a particular political bias.
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
Become a Supporter
United States
