The former president Álvaro Uribe Vélez has been summoned before the Attorney General’s Office on July 24 to face an investigation related to the massacres of El Aro and La Granja, which occurred in 1996 and 1997 during his tenure as governor of Antioquia. Uribe’s defense team is preparing evidence to prove his innocence, citing concerns over the lack of testimonial, documentary, and technical evidence. The case was previously stalled by the Attorney General’s Office in 2000 under then-Fiscal General Alfonso Gómez Méndez, who explained that an injunction was issued due to insufficient evidence. Gómez Méndez stated that the decision was based on the evaluation of available materials, particularly regarding alleged omissions. He noted that the injunction was not appealed at the time and remained in effect until the office of Fiscal Eduardo Montealegre revoked it in 2012–2014, possibly due to new evidence.
Bias read (Center): The article presents both sides of the issue—Uribe’s legal challenge and Gómez Méndez’s explanation for past decisions—without overtly favoring either side. While the subject involves high-profile political figures and legal proceedings, the framing remains balanced, focusing on factual explanations






