In the lead-up to the second round of Colombia's presidential elections in 2026, the political landscape has become increasingly polarized and complex. The Movimiento Mais, a leftist political movement, has officially joined forces with Iván Cepeda’s campaign, aligning itself with the "Alianza por la Vida" coalition. This alliance brings together various groups supporting Cepeda, who represents the Pacto Histórico, a coalition aiming to continue the policies initiated by current President Gustavo Petro. Cepeda emphasized the contrast between his campaign, which promotes peace, social equity, environmental protection, human dignity, and the preservation of indigenous cultures, and the "extreme right fascist" forces opposing him.
The decision by Movimiento Mais to support Cepeda came just days before the second round of voting. Despite its historical alignment with leftist ideals, the group confirmed its backing for Cepeda after observing shared values and commitments within the broader "life defense" agenda. Cepeda highlighted these commonalities, stating that the alignment was based on mutual identity and commitment.
Margarita Rosa de Francisco, a prominent figure in Colombian culture and media, has been vocal about her support for Cepeda. She urged centrist politicians to vote for him, arguing that Cepeda is willing to engage in dialogue and find consensus even with those who hold differing views. She criticized the notion that centrist voters felt marginalized by left-wing politics, asserting that there was no longer room for such grievances. She emphasized that Cepeda had demonstrated a willingness to engage in dialogue, even with figures like José Félix Lafaurie, and that the opposition should not resort to violence.
Meanwhile, tensions have escalated in rural areas of Caquetá, where armed groups known as "Calarcá" have reportedly pressured residents to vote for Cepeda. These groups, associated with the Disidencia del Estado Mayor de Bloques y Frentes (EMByF), have allegedly used threats and intimidation tactics. Local leaders have reported ongoing pressure, including demands for voter identification documents and warnings of fines or sanctions if compliance is not met. Additionally, reports suggest that these groups have been using their resources to transport voters, further complicating efforts by civil organizations to support Cepeda’s campaign.
The campaign of Iván Cepeda has also faced scrutiny over the involvement of government officials and contractors in its volunteer network. According to data obtained by *La Silla Vacía*, more than 1,051 individuals affiliated with public institutions were registered as volunteers for Cepeda’s campaign. While the presence of government employees in political campaigns is prohibited by law, the inclusion of contractors raises concerns about potential conflicts of interest. Notably, many of these individuals are linked to the Agencia Nacional de Tierras (ANT), an agency that has been politicized under the Petro administration. Some of these individuals have since transitioned into roles within Cepeda’s campaign, raising questions about the boundaries between official duties and political engagement.
Paulino Riascos, a former senator and member of the Pacto Histórico, has warned that his life is in danger due to his refusal to support Cepeda. He accused the administration of neglecting Afro-Colombian communities compared to indigenous ones and expressed frustration over the lack of financial support for black communities. His criticisms extended to the leadership of the Pacto Histórico, suggesting that internal dynamics within the party have contributed to his marginalization.
Andrés Felipe Harmán, the former director of the Agencia Nacional de Tierras (ANT), has been actively involved in Cepeda’s campaign, leveraging his experience in land distribution programs. His transition from public service to political campaigning has sparked controversy, particularly given the allegations of misuse of public funds during his tenure. Despite this, Harmán defended his actions, emphasizing the strategic importance of reaching voters in regions affected by land disputes and political instability.
As the election approaches, the political discourse continues to evolve, with both supporters and critics highlighting various aspects of Cepeda’s campaign. While some argue that the campaign has benefited from the influence of armed groups, others emphasize the legitimacy of Cepeda’s platform and the need for inclusive governance. With the final votes yet to be counted, the outcome remains uncertain, but the intensity of the debates underscores the significance of this election for Colombia’s future direction.
15 reports
SemanaIndependentLeftFactual 95Objective 7517 days agoPresident Gustavo Petro has canceled his regional tour and will focus on governmental matters from the Casa de Nariño. He announced plans to address modifying Law 30 to include free higher education for all citizens, regardless of economic status. Petro also mentioned new tariffs aimed at protecting and developing national industries, starting with footwear and clothing. Opposition figures criticized Petro for using the meeting to campaign for Ivan Cepeda ahead of elections.
Bias read (Left): The article highlights Petro's proposals for free higher education and protection of national industries, which align with leftist policies. The framing emphasizes Petro's actions as efforts to support Cepeda, suggesting a political motive, which leans left.
Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 75): The article accurately reports on President Petro's plans and statements regarding education policy. However, it includes opposition viewpoints that may introduce a slight bias.
La Silla VacíaIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 9010 days agoThe Historical Pact led by Senator Iván Cepeda has officially acknowledged defeat in the preliminary count results, which declared Abelardo de la Espriella as the winner. Despite raising over 57,000 complaints during the recount process, the party does not expect significant changes to the outcome. The Pact has announced a new political phase, positioning itself as the opposition leader under the incoming government, with Cepeda at the helm. To achieve this, they plan to hold a national convention to define their strategy and focus on defending democratic freedoms, social achievements, environmental justice, and building a shared agenda for Colombia’s future. They will also conduct nationwide assemblies, territorial meetings, and political committees to prepare for the 2027 local elections. Meanwhile, Juan Fernando Cristo, who served as Cepeda’s political operator, was the first to recognize de la Espriella’s victory after the initial scrutiny phase, which showed a 99.97% alignment with the preliminary count. Cepeda took responsibility for any campaign missteps and reiterated his commitment to ethical politics, rejecting easy compromises or superficial tactics.
Bias read (Center): The article provides a balanced account of the situation, presenting both the acknowledgment of defeat by the Historical Pact and their strategic response, while also including statements from both Cepeda and Cristo. There is no overtly biased language, one-sided sourcing, or omission of key context
Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 90): This article quotes the winning candidate acknowledging the loss, maintaining a neutral stance and reporting facts without emotional charge.
SemanaIndependentLeftFactual 90Objective 7521 days ago Mais Movement joins the campaign of Ivan Cepeda and will be part of the Alliance for LifeThe political movement Mais has joined Iván Cepeda's campaign ahead of the second round of presidential elections. The group has aligned with the 'Alianza por la Vida' coalition, which supports Cepeda, the candidate of the Pacto Histórico seeking to continue President Gustavo Petro's agenda. Cepeda emphasized that the alliance represents forces promoting peace, social equity, environmental protection, human dignity, and preservation of indigenous cultures against far-right fascist forces. The movement, historically leftist, confirmed its support for Cepeda just days before the second-round投票.
Bias read (Left): The article frames the alignment of the leftist Mais movement with Cepeda's campaign as a progressive force defending life, peace, social equity, nature, and indigenous cultures. It contrasts this with 'far-right fascist' forces, reinforcing a left-leaning narrative. The emphasis on Cepeda's agenda—
Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 75): The article accurately describes the political alliance and Cepeda’s policy plans. However, it emphasizes the 'forces of life' versus 'extreme right' framing, suggesting a biased perspective.
SemanaIndependentLeftFactual 90Objective 7525 days ago Margarita Rosa de Francisco posted an image and spoke about her vote in the second round:Margarita Rosa de Francisco, a prominent Colombian cultural figure and actress, has publicly expressed her support for Iván Cepeda and the proposals of the Pacto Histórico ahead of the 2026 presidential elections. She shared her views on the political situation in Colombia following the May 31 election results through social media.
Bias read (Left): The article highlights Margarita Rosa de Francisco’s open support for Iván Cepeda and the Pacto Histórico, which are leftist political entities. The framing emphasizes her ideological stance without presenting counterpoints or alternative perspectives, suggesting a left-leaning emphasis.
Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 75): This article provides factual information about Margarita Rosa de Francisco's support for Iván Cepeda and her public statements. It remains relatively neutral in tone, though it does not challenge her stance. The content aligns with the cross-source consensus.
SemanaIndependentLeftFactual 85Objective 8024 days ago Margarita Rosa de Francisco spoke about Iván Cepeda and asked the political center to vote for him: “There is no longer room for that complaint.”Margarita Rosa de Francisco, a prominent Colombian actress and cultural figure, has publicly endorsed Iván Cepeda and the Pacto Histórico in the 2026 presidential election, continuing to express these views on social media following the May 31st first round of voting.
Bias read (Left): Straightforward reporting of public statements with neutral, factual language and no inflammatory framing of either the subject or her political position.
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 80): The article discusses Margarita Rosa de Francisco’s political endorsements and her support for Iván Cepeda. It provides context about her career and public statements, presenting them neutrally. The content is based on publicly available information and social media posts, with no clear factual inac
La Silla VacíaIndependentCenterFactual 65Objective 6015 days ago The pressure of dissent from Calarcá returns to voters in CaquetáIn rural areas of northern Caquetá, residents continue to face pressure to vote for Iván Cepeda, a candidate from the Pacto Histórico. Testimonies from leaders in Cartagena del Chairá indicate that members of the 'Calarcá' group are pressuring communities to support Cepeda, similar to what occurred in the first round of voting. The governor of Caquetá, Luis Francisco Ruiz, has previously raised concerns about these activities. These groups, associated with the State Major of Blocks and Fronts (EMByF), are reportedly engaging in coercive practices that harm the environment. Despite these claims
Bias read (Center): The article presents information from multiple sources including testimonies and the governor’s statements without overtly favoring any side. It discusses both the pressures faced by voters and their potential impact on the election, maintaining a balanced perspective.
Why these scores (Factual 65 · Objective 60): The article discusses alleged pressures from armed groups in Caquetá but does not mention the DANE's poverty data. It focuses on political dynamics rather than economic indicators, so factual accuracy regarding the primary source is not applicable here. The tone leans toward reporting testimonies wi
La Silla VacíaIndependentRightFactual 65Objective 5518 days ago De La Espriella continues to grow the blacklist of politicians of petrismAbelardo De La Espriella, an attorney, has been publishing names of politicians from the Pacto Histórico who are allegedly involved in a scheme to buy votes for Iván Cepeda. These claims have been made without evidence and with threats to report them to the United States. Recent additions to the list include elected representative Andrés Vargas, a student leader from the Atlantic region, and Luis Eduardo Llinás, former director of the DIAN and friend of President Petro, who has influence in Antioquia. The article mentions new names added to the list, including Angélica Verbel, the deputy under
Bias read (Right): The article presents allegations against members of the Pacto Histórico without providing evidence, which could imply a lack of due process. Additionally, it highlights the actions of Abelardo De La Espriella, who is known for his opposition to leftist politics, suggesting a potential ideological sl
Why these scores (Factual 65 · Objective 55): Article presents allegations against politicians without evidence, uses emotive language like 'supuesta operación' and threatens legal action. Cross-source consensus suggests similar accusations but lacks verification.
La Silla VacíaIndependentCenterFactual 60Objective 7020 days ago Profile of Iván Cepeda, Truth as PowerThis week on 'La Siguiente Movida,' Héctor Riveros and Juanita León analyze who Iván Cepeda is, the presidential candidate of the Pacto Histórico, and what an eventual government under him might look like, based on his trajectory, personality, successes, and mistakes.
Bias read (Center): The article provides an analytical overview of Iván Cepeda, focusing on his background, personality, and potential policies without overtly favoring one side. It does not use biased language or selectively present information to support a particular political stance.
Why these scores (Factual 60 · Objective 70): The article provides general information about Iván Cepeda and his campaign but lacks specific details or data to support its claims. It does not directly contradict other sources but also doesn't offer new factual content beyond what is commonly reported. The tone is somewhat opinionated as it fram
SemanaIndependentLeftFactual 60Objective 505 days ago Pacto Histórico reconoce a Gustavo Petro e Iván Cepeda como líderes de la oposición al gobierno electo de Abelardo De La EspriellaThe Pacto Histórico, a coalition in Colombia, has officially recognized former presidential candidate Iván Cepeda and current President Gustavo Petro as leaders of the opposition against the newly elected government of Abelardo De La Espriella. This declaration follows a meeting at the Casa de Nariño where both figures committed to leading a 'peaceful' opposition. Cepeda emphasized his dedication to defending progressive reforms and social justice, while Petro assured that the opposition would focus on democratic and social initiatives. The Pacto Histórico highlighted their unity and commitment to continuing their political project alongside the Colombian people, stressing the importance of strengthening grassroots movements and organizing future campaigns.
Bias read (Left): The article frames the opposition led by Petro and Cepeda as a progressive force defending social reforms and democracy against an 'extreme right' government. The language emphasizes solidarity, peaceful resistance, and the continuation of leftist policies, aligning with left-wing values. The focus,
Why these scores (Factual 60 · Objective 50): Article contains exaggerated claims about armed groups influencing elections, lacking concrete evidence. Tone is alarmist and biased, suggesting a lack of objectivity.
SemanaIndependentCenterFactual 50Objective 5514 days ago Paulino Riascos warns that his life is at risk for not supporting Iván Cepeda: They already have me programmed to kill meSenator Paulino Riascos announced his departure from Congress, criticizing the Pacto Histórico party and the support provided by President Gustavo Petro's administration to Afro-Colombian communities. Riascos claimed his life is at risk due to his refusal to back Iván Cepeda, stating he has been targeted for not supporting Cepeda's campaign. He also criticized the lack of economic support for Afro-Colombian communities compared to indigenous groups. The article mentions other related developments, including Álvaro Uribe being called for investigation by the Prosecutor's Office and Claudia Lópé
Bias read (Center): The article presents statements from multiple political figures without overtly favoring any side. It includes direct quotes from Riascos expressing concerns about safety and criticism of policies, but does not provide additional context or commentary that would indicate a clear ideological slant.
Why these scores (Factual 50 · Objective 55): This article includes personal statements and allegations against politicians but does not reference the DANE's poverty statistics. Factual accuracy related to the primary source is not addressed. The tone is more emotionally charged, especially with quotes about threats to life.
La Silla VacíaIndependentRightyesterday Prosecutor denied Uribe's request to postpone the inquiry hearingThe former Colombian president, Álvaro Uribe Vélez, tweeted that the Prosecutor’s Office denied his request to postpone an investigative hearing related to allegations of involvement in human rights violations during his time as governor of Antioquia. The hearing, scheduled for July 24, 2026, concerns accusations regarding the massacres of El Aro and La Granja (1996–1997) and the killing of human rights defender Jesús María Valle. Uribe claims the decision is politically motivated, accusing high-profile figures such as Iván Velásquez, the Justice and Peace Commission (JEP), Iván Cepeda, and President Gustavo Petro of conspiring against him. He alleges that the prosecution is using a legal strategy called 'the theory of dominance' to attribute responsibility for past massacres to him, aiming to secure his arrest before Petro completes his term. Uribe further criticizes the lack of evidence and procedural fairness, claiming the investigation lacks merit and is being used to target him politically.
Bias read (Right): The article frames the situation as a politically motivated legal attack against Uribe, emphasizing conspiracy theories involving leftist figures like Petro and Cepeda. It uses emotionally charged language ('persecution', 'revanche', 'impunity') and implies that the legal process is being weaponized
SemanaIndependentLeft5 days ago Diana Ángel spoke about the Petro government and made a call after Abelardo De La Espriella's victory: I am not a criminalDiana Ángel, una actriz colombiana conocida por su destacada carrera en la televisión, ha utilizado sus redes sociales para defender su postura frente a críticas de la oposición. Tras las elecciones presidenciales de 2026, donde apoyó a Iván Cepeda del Pacto Histórico, ella respondió a comentarios que la etiquetaron como 'delincuente' o 'guerrillera'. En un mensaje publicado, negó estas acusaciones y reconoció el legado positivo del presidente Gustavo Petro, mientras animó a la sociedad a reflexionar sobre el impacto de sus políticas en el futuro.
Bias read (Left): The article frames Diana Ángel’s stance in alignment with progressive values, emphasizing her support for Gustavo Petro and criticizing opposition labels like 'delincuente' and 'guerrillera.' The language used suggests a left-leaning perspective by validating her position against conservative or far
El EspectadorIndependentLeft6 days agoIván Cepeda, a prominent leftist politician in Colombia, has stated that Gustavo Petro is 'our maximum leader,' highlighting his support for Petro's leadership within the leftist movement. This statement comes amid discussions about the direction and strategy of the left in Colombian politics. Cepeda's endorsement underscores the growing influence of Petro within the leftist coalition and signals a potential consolidation of power under his leadership. The comments reflect ongoing efforts by leftist groups to unify around a common vision for governance and social change.
Bias read (Left): The article discusses endorsements and strategic alignment within the leftist political spectrum, emphasizing support for Gustavo Petro as a unifying figure. The framing highlights leftist unity and leadership, which aligns with left-leaning perspectives.
SemanaIndependentRight10 days ago The votes of the rifle helped Cepeda: Salud Hernández-Mora after the results of the 2026 electionsJournalist Salud Hernández-Mora criticized Iván Cepeda's election results in several municipalities, suggesting that his victory was aided by illegal armed groups. She claimed that Cepeda did not acknowledge the support of these groups during his post-election speech and pointed to increased voter turnout in areas known for criminal activity. Hernández-Mora highlighted specific regions like San Vicente del Caguán and Cartagena del Chairá where Cepeda saw significant increases in votes between the first and second rounds. She also mentioned other municipalities in Chocó, Cauca, and Nariño where Cepeda achieved large majorities. The journalist accused Cepeda of hypocrisy for claiming a clean campaign despite alleged involvement of armed groups.
Bias read (Right): The article frames Iván Cepeda's election success as being influenced by illegal armed groups, using terms like 'votos de fusil' ('gun votes') and implying moral hypocrisy. It emphasizes the role of criminal structures in his victory and criticizes him for not acknowledging this support publicly. Sø
La Silla VacíaIndependentCenter14 days ago The double shelf of Iván CepedaThe article examines Iván Cepeda, a presidential candidate from the Pacto Histórico coalition, and highlights perceived inconsistencies in his ethical stance. Previously known for condemning political misconduct by former administrations, including allegations against ex-President Iván Duque’s involvement in the 2022 election campaign, Cepeda now appears to benefit from current President Gustavo Petro’s support. The analysis reviews Cepeda’s public statements and social media activity, noting that while he previously criticized Duque’s alleged interference in elections, he has since accepted backing from Petro’s administration, which includes digital campaigning and strategic electoral support. This contrast suggests a shift in Cepeda’s approach to political alliances.
Bias read (Center): The article presents an analytical comparison of Cepeda’s past and present positions without overtly favoring one side. It uses factual evidence from his public statements and actions before and after Petro’s presidency, avoiding loaded language or biased interpretation. The focus is on highlighting
CO
