ON
← Back to feed
Five years of Taliban in Afghanistan: They shoot at the legs
Germany🏛️ PoliticsProgressiveOverlooked by conservatives8 days ago

Five years of Taliban in Afghanistan: They shoot at the legs

Fünf Jahre nach der Rückeroberung Afghanistans durch die Taliban haben die radikal islamistischen Machthaber das Land weiterhin unter strengen religiösen Zwangsmaßnahmen gestellt. Frauen und Mädchen sind besonders betroffen: Sie dürfen nicht arbeiten oder studieren, müssen sich in der Öffentlichkeit von Männern trennen und sind oft von der Bildung ausgeschlossen. Die Taliban verbieten Frauen sogar, Parfüm zu verwenden, und bestrafen jede Form von friedlicher oder bewaffenter Opposition mit tödlichen Drohungen. Obwohl die Regierung zerbrochen ist und die Taliban alle Macht innehaben, zeigen sich vereinzelt Widerstandsversuche, etwa bei Demonstrationen in Herat, wo die Taliban auf die Beine geschossen haben. Internationale Aktivist*innen versuchen, die Situation als 'Gender-Apartheid' einzustufen und internationale Unterstützung zu gewinnen.

Five years after the Taliban seized control of Afghanistan, the regime continues to impose strict restrictions on women’s rights, with reports of violence against protesters and growing resistance both within the country and among the diaspora. The situation has deepened over time, marked by systemic oppression, internal divisions, and external diplomatic tensions. The Taliban took power in Afghanistan on August 15, 2021, following the withdrawal of U.S. forces from the country. After months of negotiations, the final American troops left the military base in Bagram, and the Taliban moved swiftly to reclaim full authority. Despite agreements to allow them to approach Kabul only after the last U.S. soldier had departed, the group bypassed these terms and assumed complete control. President Ashraf Ghani fled the country, marking the collapse of his government and triggering widespread displacement. The Taliban quickly began enforcing their interpretation of Islamic law, which has led to severe limitations on women's freedoms. Women and girls have been systematically excluded from public life under the Taliban’s rule. They are prohibited from attending schools beyond grade seven and are banned from universities entirely. Public spaces such as workplaces and educational institutions remain segregated by gender, with women required to wear veils and avoid interaction with men outside their families. These policies have created a climate of fear and isolation, with many women forced into domestic roles or underground activism. Recent reports indicate that even basic aspects of daily life, such as using perfume during weddings, have become subject to Taliban scrutiny. Activists describe this as a form of “gender apartheid,” arguing that it constitutes a crime against humanity and should be legally recognized. Despite the oppressive environment, pockets of resistance persist. In June, a rare protest erupted in Herat, where men and women reportedly marched together in response to the arrest of women who were allegedly improperly veiled. According to eyewitness accounts, the Taliban responded with gunfire, leaving one teenager dead. Subsequent planned protests were canceled after warnings from the regime. Women’s groups increasingly rely on online platforms to organize and share information, connecting with international campaigns aimed at raising awareness of their plight. However, even private gatherings remain risky, as the Taliban maintains tight control over public behavior. Armed resistance has also emerged, though it remains fragmented and localized. In mid-July, fighters in the northeastern province of Badakhshan briefly captured a district center from the Taliban, marking one of the few instances of direct confrontation. This action sparked hope among some in the Afghan diaspora that it could signal the beginning of a broader challenge to the regime. Yet, the movement lacks coordination, and rival factions often compete for influence. Some armed groups have expressed interest in aligning with foreign powers, including the United States, hoping for military intervention similar to past conflicts. However, such aspirations remain speculative, given the complex geopolitical landscape. Meanwhile, Germany and other Western nations continue to provide aid to Afghanistan without engaging directly with the Taliban. Federal Development Minister Reem Alabali Radovan emphasized that Germany will not collaborate with the regime, instead channeling assistance through independent partners such as the United Nations and the World Bank. She stated that while the Taliban’s policies cannot be changed, German aid aims to support women in areas such as education, healthcare, and economic independence. The German government recognizes the Taliban administration but maintains technical contacts to facilitate repatriation efforts. Critics argue that this approach leaves many Afghan citizens vulnerable, particularly as the regime continues its crackdown on dissent.

Go to the primary sources (6)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

2 reports

Tagesschau (ARD) logoTagesschau (ARD)State / PublicProgressiveFactual 50Objective 6010 days ago
Alabali Radovan: Aid to Afghans - without Taliban cooperation

Bundesentwicklungsministerin Reem Alabali Radovan betont, dass Deutschland Entwicklungshilfe für Afghanistan leisten wird, ohne mit den Taliban zusammenzuarbeiten. Sie erklärt, dass die Zusammenarbeit erfolgt über unabhängige Partner wie die Vereinten Nationen oder die Weltbank, um besonders Frauen und Mädchen zu unterstützen. Die Bundesregierung erkennt die Taliban-Regierung nicht an, hält jedoch technische Kontakte für die Abschiebung von Geflüchteten aufrecht. Grüne-Politikerin Schahina Gambir kritisiert, dass Deutschland nicht genug tut und Hilfsmaßnahmen kürzt, während AfD-Politiker Jan Nolte fordert, Hilfen an die Rücknahme von Staatsbürgern zu knüpfen.

Bias read (Progressive): Der Artikel betont die Haltung der Bundesentwicklungsministerin, die Entwicklungshilfe ohne Taliban-Kooperation zu gewährleisten, und hebt die Unterstützung für Frauen hervor. Zudem werden Kritikpunkte aus der Grünen-Fraktion erwähnt, was einen linken Standpunkt widerspiegelt. Die Stellungnahme der

Why factuality (50): This article discusses Germany's development aid policy towards Afghanistan without collaborating with the Taliban, but does not mention the specific directive about women wearing perfume or makeup. It focuses on political and humanitarian issues unrelated to the primary source document. Therefore,

Why objectivity (60): The tone is more focused on political commentary and criticism of German government policies. While it presents information about the situation in Afghanistan, it does not directly address the specific restrictions imposed by the Taliban on women's appearance, making it less objective in relation to

taz – die tageszeitung logotaz – die tageszeitungIndependentProgressiveFactual 30Objective 408 days ago
Five years of Taliban in Afghanistan: They shoot at the legs

Fünf Jahre nach der Rückeroberung Afghanistans durch die Taliban haben die radikal islamistischen Machthaber das Land weiterhin unter strengen religiösen Zwangsmaßnahmen gestellt. Frauen und Mädchen sind besonders betroffen: Sie dürfen nicht arbeiten oder studieren, müssen sich in der Öffentlichkeit von Männern trennen und sind oft von der Bildung ausgeschlossen. Die Taliban verbieten Frauen sogar, Parfüm zu verwenden, und bestrafen jede Form von friedlicher oder bewaffenter Opposition mit tödlichen Drohungen. Obwohl die Regierung zerbrochen ist und die Taliban alle Macht innehaben, zeigen sich vereinzelt Widerstandsversuche, etwa bei Demonstrationen in Herat, wo die Taliban auf die Beine geschossen haben. Internationale Aktivist*innen versuchen, die Situation als 'Gender-Apartheid' einzustufen und internationale Unterstützung zu gewinnen.

Bias read (Progressive): Der Artikel beschreibt die Taliban als radikal islamistische Machthaber, die eine 'Gender-Apartheid' praktizieren und Frauen systematisch unterdrücken. Es wird betont, dass die Taliban jegliche friedliche oder bewaffente Opposition als 'antiislamisch' bestrafen und mit dem Tod bestrafen können. Die措

Why factuality (30): This article provides historical background on the Taliban takeover of Afghanistan in 2021 but does not reference the recent directive regarding women's dress code or the ban on perfume and makeup. It focuses on broader political and social consequences without aligning with the primary source docum

Why objectivity (40): The article has a strongly critical tone toward the Taliban and their governance, presenting a one-sided narrative that emphasizes negative outcomes. This lack of balance reduces its objectivity when compared to the neutral reporting expected from a reliable news source.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories