ON
← Back to feed
FACT CHECK: ‘News’ graphic listing confidential fund recipients from VP Sara trial is fake
PH🏛️ PoliticsLean Progressive6 hr. ago

FACT CHECK: ‘News’ graphic listing confidential fund recipients from VP Sara trial is fake

A Facebook post by Philstar.com debunked a viral graphic claiming to list 22 names associated with confidential funds managed by Vice President Sara Duterte during her impeachment trial. The graphic included names like 'Miggy Mango' and 'Annie Gher,' which were alleged to be recipients of these funds. However, Philstar.com clarified that these names were fabricated and not present in the original impeachment trial graphics. The real graphic, published on August 3, listed only 11 verified names found in official records such as the Senate’s journal and livestream. The controversy arose as social media users debated whether the use of aliases was justified due to the confidential nature of the funds. The impeachment trial focused on the Commission on Audit’s findings related to Duterte’s offices, with prosecutors questioning auditors about the acknowledgment receipts.

House Speaker Faustino “Bojie” Dy III has pledged to continue implementing transparency reforms in the upcoming 2027 budget discussions, ensuring accountability and proper implementation of the spending plan. Speaking at a press briefing in Echague, Isabela, Dy emphasized that while the House of Representatives had not yet discussed these reforms in detail, they would introduce “more important security measures” to safeguard the proposed expenditures for the coming year. He refrained from providing further specifics, stating only that the reforms enacted last year had proven beneficial and that similar efforts would be pursued. The reforms from last year's budget deliberations came in response to controversies surrounding alleged manipulations in earlier spending plans. These included the abolition of a small committee responsible for finalizing the House’s budget bill in secrecy, which had previously hidden late-stage modifications. Additionally, civil society organizations were permitted to attend budget hearings, although they criticized their involvement as minimal. President Ferdinand Marcos Jr.'s administration is planning a P7.2-trillion spending plan for 2027, scheduled to be submitted to Congress within 30 days following the president’s annual state address. This budget proposal is expected to undergo rigorous scrutiny and debate in the House, reflecting the ongoing commitment to financial transparency and accountability. Meanwhile, the impeachment trial of Vice President Sara Duterte has taken center stage, with various developments unfolding. Manases Carpio, the husband of Vice President Sara Duterte, has filed complaints against several House representatives involved in the impeachment proceedings, which some lawmakers have dismissed as a “delaying tactic.” The legal battle continues as both sides present their arguments and evidence. Malacañang has defended President Marcos Jr.'s decision to release the tax records of Vice President Sara Duterte and Manases Carpio to the Senate impeachment court, asserting that the action aligns with the law. This follows claims by Carpio that legal issues surrounding the authorization of the tax records merit further investigation. Efforts to address systemic issues in the energy sector have also gained momentum. Several bills aiming to eliminate system loss charges on electricity bills have been introduced in the House of Representatives, following President Marcos' call for legislative action on the matter during his State of the Nation Address. Navotas Rep. Toby Tiangco highlighted the significance of these bills, emphasizing their potential impact on consumers. In the realm of education, a lawmaker has expressed hope that proposals addressing the shortage of textbooks will receive adequate attention from the House of Representatives. This comes amid President Marcos' emphasis on education in his recent State of the Nation Address, underscoring the need for comprehensive solutions to ensure equitable access to learning materials. The impeachment trial of Vice President Sara Duterte has seen intense exchanges, with House private prosecutor Lorna Kapunan accusing the alleged misuse of P612 million in confidential funds as “a scam against the people.” Kapunan's statements have drawn significant attention, highlighting the contentious nature of the proceedings. Former Rep. Robert Ace Barbers, serving as the House trial spokesperson and impeachment adviser, noted that acknowledgment receipts alone cannot substantiate the use of the funds for lawful intelligence activities. During the trial, Vice President Sara Duterte’s legal counsel, Michael Poa, confirmed participation in meetings with Commission on Audit (COA) officials to request an audit query regarding the use of confidential funds by the Office of the Vice President (OVP) and the Department of Education (DepEd). Poa presented a 2014 Special Allotment Release Order (SARO) to demonstrate that the OVP had been allocated confidential funds in that year, contradicting the testimony of COA auditor Roderick Wamil. As the trial progresses, the defense team continues to challenge the prosecution's claims, presenting documents and testimonies to support their position. The proceedings remain highly charged, with each side striving to present compelling evidence and arguments to sway the outcome of the impeachment trial.

Go to the primary sources (3)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

3 reports

Rappler logoRapplerIndependentCenterFactual 75Objective 652 days ago
FACT CHECK: ‘News’ graphic listing confidential fund recipients from VP Sara trial is fake

A Facebook post by Philstar.com debunked a viral graphic claiming to list 22 names associated with confidential funds managed by Vice President Sara Duterte during her impeachment trial. The graphic included names like 'Miggy Mango' and 'Annie Gher,' which were alleged to be recipients of these funds. However, Philstar.com clarified that these names were fabricated and not present in the original impeachment trial graphics. The real graphic, published on August 3, listed only 11 verified names found in official records such as the Senate’s journal and livestream. The controversy arose as social media users debated whether the use of aliases was justified due to the confidential nature of the funds. The impeachment trial focused on the Commission on Audit’s findings related to Duterte’s offices, with prosecutors questioning auditors about the acknowledgment receipts.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual correction without overtly favoring any political side. It provides evidence from official records and clarifies the discrepancy between the circulated graphic and the verified information. While the impeachment trial itself is politically charged, the article remains

Why factuality (75): The article presents a fact-check regarding a circulated graphic claiming to list confidential fund recipients during VP Sara Duterte's impeachment trial. It references a debunking by Philstar.com, which states they did not create the altered version. The article accurately reports the claim being f

Why objectivity (65): The article maintains a generally neutral tone, presenting both sides of the public reaction to the graphic. However, it includes some emotionally charged language such as 'making fun' and 'defended the use of these names,' which may reflect bias in how it frames the controversy. The overall reporti

Philippine Daily Inquirer logoPhilippine Daily InquirerIndependentProgressiveFactual 65Objective 70yesterday
Aid or reward? Hontiveros puzzled by OVP’s secret funds for medicines

Senator Risa Hontiveros has expressed confusion over the use of confidential funds by Vice President Sara Duterte's office to purchase medicines, questioning whether these funds should be considered aid or rewards for informants. She raised concerns about the potential misuse of resources and questioned the health status of the informants involved. The situation highlights ongoing scrutiny of the administration's handling of sensitive financial matters.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the use of confidential funds as potentially unethical or improper, suggesting skepticism toward the administration's actions. This aligns with a left-leaning perspective that often scrutinizes executive power and calls for transparency. The emphasis on questioning the intent and

Why factuality (65): The article reports on Senator Risa Hontiveros' confusion regarding the use of confidential funds by Vice President Sara Duterte's office to purchase medicines. It presents the question raised by Hontiveros without providing additional context or clarification, which limits the factual depth. Since

Why objectivity (70): The article maintains a neutral tone, presenting Hontiveros' questions without apparent bias. However, the phrasing 'puzzled by OVP’s secret funds' may subtly imply skepticism, though not overtly partisan. Overall, the framing remains balanced.

Rappler logoRapplerIndependentProgressive6 hr. ago
[Edgewise] ‘Public School Confidential’

The article discusses the impeachment trial of Vice President Sara Duterte, focusing on allegations that she misused confidential funds by deploying secret agents to public schools. It includes commentary from legal experts and fictionalized dialogues that highlight the complexities of the case. The piece also references legal arguments surrounding her alleged threats against President Rodrigo Duterte and the use of legal terminology to frame the narrative. The tone is informal and uses humor and exaggeration, blending real legal concepts with fictional elements.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the impeachment proceedings in a manner that suggests skepticism toward the administration and highlights potential misconduct. While it presents legal arguments, the overall tone leans left by emphasizing the need for accountability and using language that implies the opposition,

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories