On June 23, 2026, actress and producer Cate Blanchett made a significant appearance at the European Parliament in Brussels, where she unveiled a platform aimed at protecting citizens' rights against the misuse of artificial intelligence (AI). The initiative, known as the "Human Consent Registry," seeks to empower individuals by allowing them to control how their personal data—such as names, images, voices, and other identifiers—are used by AI systems. This move comes amid growing concerns about privacy and the ethical implications of AI technologies, particularly in sectors such as healthcare and entertainment.
Blanchett emphasized that in the age of AI, identity is a form of intellectual property, and each person has the right to decide how their identity can or cannot be utilized. During her speech at the event, she highlighted the importance of ensuring that technology evolves in alignment with human values and aspirations for the future. The Human Consent Registry is designed to be accessible via the website rslmedia.org, enabling users to register information defining their identities and specify whether they consent to its use by AI systems. Users have three levels of consent options: green (unrestricted use), yellow (use under conditions), and red (prohibition).
The registry aims to protect both personal identities and creative works, including trademarks. It is intended to serve not only individuals but also intermediaries such as agents and managers of artists. However, it remains unclear whether this system will become a systematic legal obligation in most jurisdictions, as enforcement mechanisms vary widely across regions.
In addition to the launch of the Human Consent Registry, Blanchett had previously signed an open letter alongside over 800 artists, accusing major AI companies of "theft" regarding the unauthorized use of their likenesses and creations. This initiative reflects a broader movement among creators and advocates who seek to assert greater control over how their work and identities are represented and utilized in digital spaces.
European Parliament member Eva Maydler from the European People's Party (EPP) praised the registry as a tool that makes rights transparent, enhances trust, and centers human creativity within technological progress. She acknowledged the need to ensure that AI development aligns with societal values and emphasizes the role of the registry in promoting accountability and transparency in the use of personal data.
The launch of the Human Consent Registry follows a series of discussions and debates around the ethical use of AI, especially concerning the protection of personal data and the potential risks associated with AI applications in sensitive areas such as healthcare. These concerns were further underscored by reports highlighting the dangers of using AI chatbots in medical contexts, where the risk of misinformation and data breaches could pose serious threats to user health and privacy.
As the debate on AI ethics continues to evolve, the Human Consent Registry represents a proactive step toward empowering individuals to take charge of their digital footprints. While the effectiveness of such platforms depends on widespread adoption and regulatory support, the initiative marks a significant milestone in the ongoing discourse surrounding the responsible development and deployment of AI technologies.
2 reports
Proto ThemaIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 7513 days agoActress Kate Blanchett presented a platform called 'Human Consent Registry' at the European Parliament in Brussels, aiming to protect citizens' rights against unauthorized use of their identity by artificial intelligence systems. The platform allows individuals to register personal data such as name, image, or voice and decide whether they want these elements used by AI services. It is accessible via the website rslmedia.org and offers three levels of consent: green (unrestricted use), yellow (use under conditions), and red (prohibition). The initiative was supported by EuroMP Eva Maydler from the European People's Party, who emphasized its role in making rights transparent and placing human creativity at the center of technological progress. The platform aims to be available to both private individuals and intermediaries like agents or managers of artists.
Bias read (Center): The article presents information about a new platform aimed at protecting individual rights regarding AI usage, with quotes from both Kate Blanchett and a European Parliament member. There is no evident ideological framing or biased language; the content remains neutral, focusing on the features and
Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 75): Factual content aligns with cross-source consensus on Kate Blanchett presenting an AI rights platform. The article accurately reports her statement about identity as intellectual property. Objectivity is moderate due to some emotionally charged phrasing around 'cloning' and 'stealing' by tech giants
KathimeriniIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 8013 days agoThe article discusses the growing use of artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots in healthcare and highlights potential risks associated with their use. While these tools can assist users in preparing for medical visits or understanding health-related terms, they pose significant dangers when used to replace professional medical advice. Concerns include the possibility of receiving incorrect medical guidance, sharing sensitive personal information with systems that lack the same privacy protections as healthcare providers, and the risk of data misuse by third parties. A study from Oxford University found that users often do not know which information to share with large language models (LLMs), and these models frequently provide mixed or inaccurate responses. Additionally, there are non-health-related risks such as the potential for sensitive health data to be used for training AI models or falling victim to cyberattacks. The cybersecurity firm ESET warns that health data is particularly valuable to fraudsters due to its long-term utility and difficulty in replacement. Many AI tools in healthcare are not subject to strict data protection regulations in the US, further increasing the
Bias read (Center): The article focuses on technological concerns related to AI chatbots in healthcare, emphasizing technical and privacy issues rather than political controversy. It presents factual information and warnings without overtly favoring any particular viewpoint.
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 80): Factual claims about health risks from AI chatbots are supported by research cited. Article presents both benefits and risks objectively, though slightly more emphasis on risks than benefits.
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
Become a Supporter
GR
