Ahmetović on the case of the Swiss citizen: We would protect citizens as in 2015

HRT (Hrvatska radiotelevizija)State / PublicLeftFactual 95Objective 8516 days ago

Mirela Ahmetović, SDP zastupnica, izjavila je da SDP nikada ne bi pokušao utjecati na pravosuđe, ali bi pronašao način zaštititi građane kao što je to uradio 2015. godine. Komentirala je presudu Vrhovnog suda u slučaju 'švicarac', prema kojoj potrošači imaju pravo na zatezne kamate, ali ne i na povrat preplaćene glavnice. Ahmetović je također napomenula da su građani koji su bili žrtve financijskog sustava razočarani presudom, jer će primati samo jednu petinu punog obeštećenja. Zastupnik Boris Lalovac zahvalio je SDP-u i Možemo na kandidaturi za viceguvernera.

Bias read (Left): The article presents statements from an SDP representative criticizing the ruling party (HDZ) for not adequately protecting citizens in financial matters. The framing emphasizes SDP's past actions as protective of citizens and implies criticism toward the current government's handling of the issue.

Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 85): Highly factual with direct quotes from Mirela Ahmetović and references to court decisions. However, the article has a clear political bias favoring SDP, using phrases like 'ne bi odmahivao rukom kao HDZ' which implies criticism of HDZ.

HRT (Hrvatska radiotelevizija)State / PublicCenterFactual 95Objective 8012 days ago

The Croatian Parliament's Committee on the Constitution, Statute, and Political System has heard the first five of 15 candidates for constitutional judges. The ruling HDZ party aims to appoint three new judges before the summer recess, but the opposition SDP refuses to negotiate, citing past controversies involving Prime Minister Andrej Plenković. Previously, three candidates failed to secure the required two-thirds majority due to disagreements between the governing party and the opposition. One candidate withdrew, while three others who had previously been discussed re-entered the race. The committee will continue hearing the remaining ten candidates at its next session. SDP plans to analyze all candidates after their hearings and propose those they deem most qualified. HDZ leader Ivan Malenica urged the opposition to engage in negotiations to finalize the appointments before the summer break, warning that the Constitutional Court would remain understaffed if no agreement is reached.

Bias read (Center): The article presents both perspectives of the HDZ and SDP parties regarding the appointment process of constitutional judges. It includes direct quotes from representatives of both parties, highlighting their differing positions and motivations without favoring either side. There is no evident bias,

Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 80): Factual with specific names and events mentioned. The article presents both sides but leans slightly towards SDP by highlighting their refusal to negotiate with HDZ.

Index.hrIndependentRightFactual 95Objective 8016 days ago

Members of the HDZ parliamentary group criticized the president of the SDP, Siniša Hajdaš Dončić, for suggesting that if the SDP were in power, the Constitutional Court would not have issued a ruling on 'Švicari' (Swiss nationals). The HDZ accused the SDP of undermining the judiciary and attempting to influence institutions. Krunoslav Katičić called this narrative unacceptable and emphasized the independence of the judiciary in Croatia. Nikola Mažar mentioned that 16 candidates who met the requirements for constitutional court judges will be announced on Tuesday and Wednesday.

Bias read (Right): The article presents the HDZ's perspective with strong negative language toward the SDP, accusing them of undermining judicial independence and influencing institutions. The framing emphasizes the SDP's alleged misconduct while defending the judiciary's autonomy, which aligns with conservative/liber

Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 80): Highly factual with detailed information about the candidates and the selection process. The article remains relatively neutral despite mentioning political tensions.

Novi listIndependentLeftFactual 95Objective 8016 days ago

Mirela Ahmetović, SDP zastupnica, komentirala je presudu Vrhovnog suda u slučaju 'švicarac', tvrdeći da SDP nikada ne bi pokušao utjecati na pravosuđe, ali bi pronašao način zaštititi građane. Ahmetović je naglasila da SDP, kao i ostali politički stranke, ima pravo komentirati javno dostupne sudske presude. U vezi s tim, spomenula je da su građani koji su bili žrtve financijskog sustava razočarani presudom. Siniša Hajdaš Dončić, predsjednik SDP-a, naveo je da bi takva odluka 'ne bi dogodila da je SDP na vlasti' i da je zakonom o švicarcima SDP 'stjerao banke u kut'. Zastupnik Boris Lalovac zah

Bias read (Left): The article presents statements from SDP officials criticizing the court decision and implying that the ruling would not have occurred if SDP were in power. The framing emphasizes SDP's role in protecting citizens and criticizes the current government (HDZ), suggesting a left-leaning perspective.

Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 80): Very factual with direct quotes and references to court decisions. The article maintains a moderate tone but subtly supports SDP's position through its narrative.

N1 HrvatskaIndependentRightFactual 95Objective 7626 days ago

The Croatian HDZ party posted a video on Facebook showing an incident involving parliamentary representative Sandra Benčić (from the Možemo party), claiming she insulted Minister Ivan Malenić with the word 'stoka' (meaning 'cattle'). Benčić later confirmed saying the word but clarified it was directed at the HDZ party, not individuals. She mentioned this occurred after the HDZ submitted 17 candidate proposals for judges of the Constitutional Court.

Bias read (Right): The article frames the situation in a manner that emphasizes the alleged insult by Benčić and presents the HDZ's response as a justified reaction. The language used by HDZ ('progresivna, kulturna, moderna...') appears to be complimentary toward their own party while subtly criticizing Benčić's party

Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 76): The article accurately details the debate within the Constitutional Committee and the controversy surrounding the selection of judges. It remains relatively neutral but does include some emotionally charged descriptions of the political conflict.

tportalIndependentLeftFactual 95Objective 7526 days ago

Sandra Benčić, a representative of the Možemo party, confirmed she used the word 'stoko' (which can be interpreted as an insult) during a meeting of the Constitutional Committee, directed at members of the HDZ party. She explained this was a reaction to the process of selecting judges for the Constitutional Court, which she criticized as being conducted hastily and without proper transparency. Benčić expressed frustration with the government's handling of decisions and the perceived manipulation of citizens.

Bias read (Left): The article presents Benčić's statement as a direct criticism of the HDZ party and the government's actions, highlighting her frustration with the political process and the use of political power over citizens. The framing emphasizes her alignment with public dissatisfaction against the ruling party

Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 75): High factual accuracy as it directly quotes Benčić's statements and provides context from her Facebook post. However, the tone is somewhat biased towards her perspective, lacking counterpoints.

Jutarnji listIndependentLeftFactual 95Objective 7026 days ago

Sandra Benčić has clarified that her use of the word 'stoka' (which translates to 'thieves') during a parliamentary session was directed at the Croatian Democratic Union (HDZ). She criticized the HDZ for hastily adding a discussion on candidates for judges of the Constitutional Court to the agenda of the parliamentary committee. Benčić expressed frustration with what she viewed as an underhanded procedural move by the ruling party.

Bias read (Left): The article presents Sandra Benčić’s criticism of the HDZ using strong language such as 'drumski razbojnici' ('bandits') and frames the HDZ as acting unethically and manipulatively. The tone supports Benčić’s perspective without significant counterbalance from the HDZ or other viewpoints.

Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 70): The article accurately reports Sandra Benčić's admission of using the word 'stoka' referring to HDZ. It includes her explanation of the context and quotes from her Facebook post. The tone is somewhat biased as it presents her perspective without counterpoints from HDZ.

Novi listIndependentRightFactual 95Objective 6525 days ago

The Croatian Democratic Union (HDZ) responded to Sandra Benčić of Možemo, who had referred to HDZ members as 'stoka' (cattle), by accusing her of using vulgar language and defending her statement as justified. Benčić clarified that she made the comment after HDZ submitted 17 candidates for the Constitutional Court without holding a discussion on the matter, which she criticized as an example of political behavior expecting others to remain silent.

Bias read (Right): The article frames HDZ's response as a defense of their actions and criticizes Benčić's language, suggesting a right-leaning perspective by emphasizing HDZ's position and portraying Benčić's comments as inappropriate rather than addressing the underlying issue of procedural transparency.

Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 65): This article repeats similar information to article 5 but with slightly different phrasing. It accurately reports Benčić's admission and the context surrounding it. The tone remains biased in favor of HDZ.

Novi listIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 6526 days ago

Sandra Benčić (Možemo) confirmed on Facebook that she said 'stoko' (which translates to 'shame') during a session of the Parliamentary Committee for the Constitution, Statute, and Political System, referring to the HDZ party. The HDZ had previously posted a video clip showing Benčić approaching the camera before the word 'stoko' was heard. Benčić explained that her comment came after receiving 17 candidate proposals for judges of the Constitutional Court and a postponed debate. She criticized what she described as political manipulation and the underestimation of citizens.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a direct statement by Sandra Benčić confirming her remark and provides her explanation for it. It includes her critique of HDZ actions without overtly favoring either side. The framing remains neutral, presenting both the claim and the context without evident bias toward one政治立场

Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 65): The article accurately reports Benčić's admission of using the word 'stoka' referring to HDZ. It includes her explanation of the context and quotes from her Facebook post. The tone is somewhat biased as it presents her perspective without counterpoints from HDZ.

tportalIndependentRightFactual 95Objective 6026 days ago

Sandra Benčić, a member of the Možemo party and parliamentary representative, admitted to saying 'stoka' (which translates to 'scum') during a session of the Constitutional Committee, referring to the HDZ party. In response, HDZ accused her of insulting both their party and SDP representative Saša Đujić, who was involved in the same committee meeting. HDZ stated that if they were considered 'stoka,' then so was Đujić, and criticized Možemo for how they treat their junior partners. HDZ also claimed that Benčić did not apologize for her remarks, calling them typical of her discourse.

Bias read (Right): The article presents HDZ's response to Benčić's remark with strong language emphasizing insult and criticism towards Možemo, while defending their own position and indirectly criticizing an SDP member. The framing highlights HDZ's perspective without balancing it with Možemo's potential defense or a

Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 60): The article accurately reports HDZ's response to Sandra Benčić's comments. It includes direct quotes from HDZ's Facebook post. The tone is clearly biased in favor of HDZ and critical of Možemo.

Net.hrIndependentRightFactual 94Objective 7826 days ago

The Croatian Democratic Union (HDZ) posted a video on Facebook showing Sandra Benčić saying the word 'stoka' (meaning 'donkey') as she walked away from a parliamentary committee session. HDZ claims this was directed at Ivan Malenić, former dean of the University of Split, and other members of the parliamentary majority. Benčić responded by confirming she said the word, stating it referred to HDZ and expressing frustration with what she described as political manipulation and disrespect toward citizens.

Bias read (Right): The article presents HDZ's claim that Benčić used the term 'stoka' to criticize HDZ members, which is framed as an attack on the party. The tone of the article supports HDZ's interpretation of the event, emphasizing their narrative without providing balanced counterpoints or alternative perspectives

Why these scores (Factual 94 · Objective 78): The article accurately reports the incident involving Benčić calling HDZ members 'stoka' and her subsequent clarification. While it presents both sides, it still has a slight lean towards supporting Benčić’s perspective.

Telegram.hrIndependentRightFactual 94Objective 7016 days ago

The head of the Social Democratic Party (SDP), Siniša Hajdaš Dončić, claimed that if the SDP were in power, the Constitutional Court would have ruled differently on the 'Swiss case.' In response, representatives of the Croatian Democratic Union (HDZ) accused Hajdaš of attempting to undermine the judiciary by implying political influence over judicial decisions.

Bias read (Right): The article presents the HDZ's accusation against Hajdaš as a direct challenge to his claims, using strong language such as 'undermining the judiciary' and 'attempting to subjugate institutions,' which frames the SDP leader's comments as politically motivated and inappropriate. The framing implies a

Why these scores (Factual 94 · Objective 70): Provides detailed information on the candidates for constitutional judges. The tone remains mostly neutral, though there is a slight lean towards the process being stalled.

N1 HrvatskaIndependentRightFactual 93Objective 7224 days ago

The article discusses escalating political tensions in Croatia following a parliamentary session where a member of the ruling HDZ party accused opposition MP Možamo Sandra Benčić of calling them 'cattle' after she criticized the addition of a point on the agenda regarding the formation of candidates for the Constitutional Court. Benčić defended her remarks, stating she had no need to apologize to HDZ. HDZ members condemned her comments, with MP Nikola Mažar accusing her of expressing radical leftist views toward Croatian citizens. The dispute also involves disagreements over whether the agenda

Bias read (Right): The article frames the controversy through the perspective of HDZ representatives, emphasizing their condemnation of Benčić's remarks and portraying her as representing 'radical leftist' views. The language used by HDZ officials is more prominently featured, suggesting an alignment with their stance

Why these scores (Factual 93 · Objective 72): The article accurately describes the political conflict over the agenda item and the verbal exchange between Benčić and HDZ members. However, it frames the situation as an attack on institutions by the SDP, showing some bias.

Jutarnji listIndependentCenterFactual 93Objective 7026 days ago

The Croatian Parliament's Committee on Constitution, Statute, and Political System has provisionally approved a list of candidates for three new Constitutional Court judges. Seventeen candidates applied, but one was deemed invalid. The committee plans to interview the candidates next week, followed by inter-party negotiations requiring a two-thirds parliamentary majority for their selection. Among the applicants are three individuals previously discussed by the parliament. A brief but intense political debate preceded the decision, with Sandra Benčić (from the Možemo! party) protesting the短时间内

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced account of the procedural steps taken by the committee, mentions the political disagreement without taking sides, and includes quotes from opposing perspectives without editorializing.

Why these scores (Factual 93 · Objective 70): The article accurately reports the SDP's stance on judicial independence and their criticism of the HDZ. However, it uses strong language such as 'bandits on the road' which indicates a lack of complete neutrality.

tportalIndependentRightFactual 92Objective 7016 days ago

Representatives of the HDZ parliamentary group responded to an announcement by SDP leader Siniša Hajdaš Dončić, who claimed that if the SDP were in power, the Supreme Court would not have issued a decision regarding the 'Švicari' case. The HDZ criticized this statement as an attack on the judiciary and an attempt to undermine institutions. Krunoslav Katičić emphasized the independence of the judiciary and accused Dončić of hypocrisy, stating that it is unacceptable to influence Croatian institutions which must remain independent. Nikola Mažar announced that 16 candidates eligible for the role

Bias read (Right): The article frames the HDZ's response as a defense of judicial independence and criticizes the SDP leader's comments as hypocritical and an attack on institutions. The language used by HDZ representatives emphasizes the need to protect the judiciary from political influence, suggesting a right-wing傾

Why these scores (Factual 92 · Objective 70): The article presents facts about the HDZ's response to SDP leader's comments on the judiciary. It includes direct quotes but uses emotionally charged language such as 'licentious' and 'absurdly unacceptable,' indicating a lack of neutrality.

tportalIndependentLeftFactual 92Objective 7016 days ago

Mirela Ahmetović, SDP zastupnica, komentirala je presudu Vrhovnog suda u slučaju 'švicarac', gdje su potrošači dobili pravo na zatezne kamate, ali ne i na povrat preplaćene glavnice. Ahmetović je tvrdila da bi SDP zaštitio građane kao što je to uradio 2015. godine, dok je Siniša Hajdaš Dončić, predsjednik SDP-a, naveo da bi takva presuda ne postojala ako je SDP bio na vlasti. Ahmetović je također naglasila da su građani koji su bili žrtve financijskog sustava razočarani.

Bias read (Left): The article presents statements from SDP officials criticizing the ruling and implying that the current government (HDZ) has failed to protect citizens adequately. The framing emphasizes SDP's past actions as protective of citizens and criticizes the current administration, which aligns with a left-

Why these scores (Factual 92 · Objective 70): Factual content aligns with other reports about the Swiss case and Ahmetović's comments. The tone remains relatively neutral but shows some political bias in favor of SDP.

HRT (Hrvatska radiotelevizija)State / PublicRightFactual 92Objective 652 days ago

The article reports on a call by the HDZ (Croatian Democratic Union) for negotiations with the SDP (Social Democrats) and other parties to appoint three additional judges to the Constitutional Court before the summer recess of parliament, which ends on July 15. HDZ leader Ante Sanader emphasized the importance of completing the court’s composition to ensure it can function fully and make decisions, particularly in light of recent legal disputes involving President Zoran Milanović. He stated that nine days after evaluating all candidates was sufficient time to choose the best candidates. In contrast, the SDP has rejected the idea of negotiating with HDZ, stating they will not agree on names this time and plan to wait until autumn to complete the selection process. The SDP accused HDZ of attempting to block the Constitutional Court, while HDZ argued that the SDP’s refusal undermines institutional integrity.

Bias read (Right): The article frames the situation as a necessary step to restore the functionality of the Constitutional Court, emphasizing the urgency and legitimacy of HDZ’s position. It portrays the SDP’s rejection as obstructionist and harmful to democratic institutions, using language that implies the SDP is un

Why these scores (Factual 92 · Objective 65): Accurate in detailing the conflict between SDP and HDZ regarding judicial decisions. The tone is more aligned with HDZ's viewpoint, lowering the neutrality score.

N1 HrvatskaIndependentLeftFactual 92Objective 6516 days ago

Mirela Ahmetović, SDP zastupnica, tvrdi da bi SDP zaštitio građane kao što je to uradio 2015. godine, bez utjecaja na pravosuđe. Komentirala je presudu Vrhovnog suda o konvertiranim kreditima u švicarskim francima, prema kojoj potrošači imaju pravo na zatezne kamate, ali ne i na povrat preplaćene glavnice. Predsjednik SDP-a Siniša Hajdaš Dončić naveo je da bi takva odluka ''ne bi dogodila da je SDP na vlasti''. Ahmetović je dodala da presuda razočarala je desetke tisuća građana.

Bias read (Left): The article reports on public comments by political figures regarding a court decision without taking a stance or using biased language. It presents statements from both SDP members and mentions their perspectives without favoring one side over another.

Why these scores (Factual 92 · Objective 65): The article accurately summarizes the events around the selection of constitutional judges and the reactions from various parties. However, it contains a strong critique of HDZ actions and uses humor to mock them, which affects objectivity.

Jutarnji listIndependentRightFactual 91Objective 6226 days ago

Following Sandra Benčić's comment during a session of the Constitutional Committee, where she used the word 'stoka' (which was recorded), the Croatian Democratic Union (HDZ) responded by criticizing her remarks. They stated this incident demonstrates how 'možemo' treats its junior partners. HDZ also mentioned that if they are considered 'stoka,' then SDP member Saša Đujić would also fall into that category, as he agreed to include the item about candidates for the Constitutional Court. HDZ emphasized that they would not retaliate with insults but noted that Benčić's behavior was vulgar and one

Bias read (Right): The article presents HDZ's response to Sandra Benčić's comments using strong language and frames the situation as an example of how 'možemo' treats its junior partners. The tone is critical of Benčić and implies that her actions reflect poorly on 'možemo.' The framing emphasizes HDZ's position and批评

Why these scores (Factual 91 · Objective 62): Accurate in presenting Sanader's call for cooperation on constitutional judges. The tone leans slightly towards HDZ's position, reducing the neutrality score.

N1 HrvatskaIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 7512 days ago

The Croatian Parliament's Committee on the Constitution, Rules, and Political System has begun hearing candidates for three constitutional judges. The Social Democratic Party (SDP) announced it will not negotiate with the ruling HDZ party this time due to past controversies involving Prime Minister Andrej Plenković, who previously unilaterally proposed candidates without consensus. SDP plans to evaluate all candidates after interviews and propose their preferred choices for the committee. Meanwhile, HDZ President Ivan Malenica urged the opposition to agree on candidate names to complete the Constitutional Court before the summer recess, warning that otherwise the court would remain understaffed until autumn. The committee received 17 applications, but one was invalid and another candidate withdrew, leaving 15 eligible candidates.

Bias read (Center): The article presents both the SDP's refusal to negotiate with HDZ over constitutional judges and HDZ's call for compromise, without favoring either side. It includes direct quotes from representatives of both parties and provides balanced context about the process and previous disputes.

Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 75): The article accurately reports statements from SDP and HDZ representatives regarding the constitutional court judges selection process. However, it exhibits a clear bias in favor of the SDP, using terms like 'contaminated process' and 'political trade,' which may not be entirely neutral.