ON
← Back to feed
AFL executive salaries are ‘indefensible’: Former commissioner takes aim at head office
Australia🏛️ PoliticsProgressiveOverlooked by conservatives9 days ago

AFL executive salaries are ‘indefensible’: Former commissioner takes aim at head office

In his new book 'Ideas and Reflections: From Four Decades Inside the AFL Bubble,' former AFL commissioner Colin Carter criticizes the Australian Football League's executive compensation structure, calling it 'indefensible.' Carter argues that AFL CEOs earn significantly more than top players, highlighting a disparity where a CEO could make over $3 million annually while the highest-paid player earns less than $1 million. He also critiques the AFL's decision to keep executive salaries confidential, a practice he associates with past leadership under Andrew Demetriou and Gillon McLachlan. Additionally, Carter raises concerns about the AFL's stance on gambling, its handling of Carlton's 1995 premiership controversy, and its bonus scheme for executives. The book includes sharp criticisms of current and past leadership, including former chairman Richard Goyder, and suggests broader governance issues within the league.

Former AFL commissioner Colin Carter has launched a scathing critique of the league's executive compensation structure in his newly released book, Ideas and Reflections: From Four Decades Inside the AFL Bubble. In the publication, Carter calls the current pay scale for AFL executives “indefensible,” highlighting the stark disparity between the earnings of top officials and the highest-paid players. According to Carter, the AFL chief executive earned more than $3 million annually during a period when the best-paid player earned less than $1 million. The remarks come amid growing public scrutiny of the league’s financial practices and governance decisions. Carter’s criticisms extend beyond just executive salaries. In a message to North Melbourne president Sonja Hood, he warned her that she might not enjoy his published comments regarding the club’s decision to reject relocation options to the Gold Coast or Tasmania. He described the club’s stance as “regrettable” and a missed opportunity for both the Kangaroos and the broader competition. Hood responded with good grace, acknowledging her disagreement with Carter’s assessment. Carter argues that maintaining a Victorian-based team is essential to the AFL’s long-term viability, suggesting that the league should continue pursuing relocation strategies to ensure competitive balance. The former commissioner also questioned the AFL’s governance during the tenure of former chairman Richard Goyder, particularly the decision to grant the MCG exclusive rights to host the grand final until 2059. Carter suggests this move has undermined the fairness of the fixture schedule and raises concerns about the influence of senior figures within the league. Additionally, he criticizes the AFL’s decision to keep executive salaries confidential, a policy that he claims was upheld under the leadership of former CEOs Andrew Demetriou and Gillon McLachlan. Carter argues that transparency in such matters is crucial for accountability and public trust. In another chapter of his book, titled What I Don’t Understand, Carter expresses confusion over the AFL’s reluctance to experiment with a twilight grand final, a format that gained popularity during the pandemic. He questions whether Goyder, who had previously supported the idea, was overruled by then-executive Gillon McLachlan. Carter also highlights the potential long-term consequences of the league’s free-to-air scheduling model, arguing that it risks alienating fans and reducing revenue streams. Beyond these points, Carter outlines several other contentious issues facing the AFL. He criticizes the league’s silence on gambling, noting that it contrasts sharply with its efforts to promote other social causes. He also points to the 1995 Carlton premiership controversy, asserting that the club was fortunate not to lose its title due to leniency in enforcing salary cap rules. Furthermore, Carter challenges the AFL’s executive bonus scheme, claiming it incentivizes actions that may harm certain clubs. He also calls for the withdrawal of the league’s guaranteed financial support to clubs and urges a reassessment of AFLW player payment structures, which he views as a significant financial burden. Carter’s book includes a detailed analysis of past initiatives, including the establishment of the independent AFL Commission in the early 1990s, the reconstruction of the Great Southern Stand, and the return of VFL members to the MCG. These contributions underscore his deep involvement in shaping the modern AFL. Bill Kelty, a respected figure in Australian football, refers to Carter as one of the “fathers of the modern AFL,” emphasizing the significance of his insights into the league’s evolution. AFL chief executive Andrew Dillon has read the book and was contacted for comment, though no official statement has been issued. As the league continues to navigate complex financial and operational challenges, Carter’s critiques serve as a provocative call for greater transparency, reform, and alignment between executive pay and player welfare. The debate over executive compensation and governance will likely remain a focal point in discussions surrounding the AFL’s future direction.

2 reports

The Age logoThe AgeIndependentProgressiveFactual 65Objective 559 days ago
AFL executive salaries are ‘indefensible’: Former commissioner takes aim at head office

In his new book 'Ideas and Reflections: From Four Decades Inside the AFL Bubble,' former AFL commissioner Colin Carter criticizes the league's executive compensation structure, calling it 'indefensible' as AFL CEOs earn significantly more than top players. Carter argues that keeping executive salaries confidential undermines transparency and accountability, particularly under the leadership of former commissioners Andrew Demetriou and Gillon McLachlan. He also raises concerns about the AFL's governance practices, including the decision to grant the MCG grand final rights until 2059, which he claims exacerbates fixture unfairness. Additionally, Carter critiques the AFL's stance on gambling and highlights past controversies such as the 1995 Carlton premiership dispute. The book includes sharp criticisms of current and former leaders, suggesting systemic issues within the league's management.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the AFL's executive pay policies as unethical and secretive, using strong language like 'indefensible' and criticizing the lack of transparency. It positions Carter as a reformer challenging entrenched power structures, aligning with progressive critique of corporate governance. S

Why factuality (65): Similar to the first article, this piece relies on Colin Carter's book for its claims about AFL executive salaries and governance. There is no primary source document to confirm the specifics, and the information is presented as part of Carter's opinion rather than verified facts. The reference to t

Why objectivity (55): This article maintains the same critical tone as the previous one, emphasizing the disparity between executive pay and player earnings. It does not include opposing viewpoints or contextual information that might balance the discussion, maintaining a one-sided perspective.

The Sydney Morning Herald logoThe Sydney Morning HeraldIndependentProgressiveFactual 65Objective 559 days ago
AFL executive salaries are ‘indefensible’: Former commissioner takes aim at head office

In his new book 'Ideas and Reflections: From Four Decades Inside the AFL Bubble,' former AFL commissioner Colin Carter criticizes the Australian Football League's executive compensation structure, calling it 'indefensible.' Carter argues that AFL CEOs earn significantly more than top players, highlighting a disparity where a CEO could make over $3 million annually while the highest-paid player earns less than $1 million. He also critiques the AFL's decision to keep executive salaries confidential, a practice he associates with past leadership under Andrew Demetriou and Gillon McLachlan. Additionally, Carter raises concerns about the AFL's stance on gambling, its handling of Carlton's 1995 premiership controversy, and its bonus scheme for executives. The book includes sharp criticisms of current and past leadership, including former chairman Richard Goyder, and suggests broader governance issues within the league.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the AFL's executive pay practices as unjust and highlights disparities between CEO earnings and player wages, using strong language like 'indefensible' and criticizing the secrecy of executive salaries. While the subject is about sports governance, the critique of economic equity,

Why factuality (65): The article presents claims about AFL executive salaries and governance issues based on Colin Carter's new book. While it references specific statements made by Carter, there is no primary source document to verify these claims directly. The article aligns with the cross-source consensus that Carter

Why objectivity (55): The tone of the article leans toward criticism of AFL leadership, particularly focusing on perceived unfairness in executive pay. It uses emotionally charged language such as 'indefensible' and frames the issue as a broader governance problem. The article does not present counterpoints or alternativ

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories