N1 HrvatskaIndependentConservativeFactual 96Objective 858/30/2026The article reports that a screenshot of a message allegedly sent within a WhatsApp group of the Croatian Democratic Union (HDZ) has circulated on social media. The message appears to instruct members on how to respond to the 'Hodaj za Liku' protest, organized for September 5th in Zagreb against illegal and toxic waste in Gospić. The message suggests attacking groups and individuals associated with the protest using specific labels such as 'extreme leftists,' 'anti-Heretics,' and 'Yugoslavs.' It also encourages continued attacks with different epithets if responses are received. In response, HDZ called the content 'amateurish sabotage' by activists, claiming it reflects growing frustration with radical leftist movements and attempts to misrepresent the protest as being orchestrated by HDZ. The party denied any involvement in organizing the protest and criticized past leftist-led protests as failures.
Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the alleged instructions as a form of 'amateurish sabotage' by activists, implying that the opposition (leftist groups) are attempting to manipulate public perception through disinformation. The language used by HDZ emphasizes the threat posed by radical leftist movements and the
Why factuality (96): The article accurately reports HDZ's response to the alleged fake message. It includes direct quotes from HDZ's official statement and aligns with the cross-source consensus.
Why objectivity (85): The article maintains a neutral tone throughout, presenting facts without taking sides. It avoids emotional language and focuses on the content of HDZ's response.
Jutarnji listIndependentConservativeFactual 96Objective 858/30/2026The ruling Croatian Democratic Union (HDZ) has issued a strongly worded statement criticizing what they describe as amateurish disinformation spread by radical left activists online. The HDZ claims these activists are attempting to shift blame onto them for issues related to waste management in Lika, suggesting that the growing awareness among citizens of the radical left’s alleged parasitic behavior is being falsely attributed to HDZ actions. In their post, the HDZ shared screenshots of what they claim are fabricated messages circulating on social media, which allegedly suggest that supporters of protests should be labeled as extremists, Yugoslavs, anti-Croatians, or haters of all things Croatian. The HDZ emphasized that it does not oppose any legal protest and reiterated that the upcoming protest in Lika is scheduled for September 5th. They further argue that the left has faced setbacks with previous protests like 'Rijeka Nepravda' and the Balkan March, and now seeks to deflect attention from its failure to address local issues such as waste management in Gospić by creating false narratives.
Bias read (Conservative): The article presents the HDZ's perspective using strong language such as 'amateurs,' 'parasitic behavior,' and 'fabricated messages.' It frames the radical left as spreading disinformation and accuses them of shifting blame onto the HDZ while ignoring local issues. The tone is critical of the left,
Why factuality (96): The article accurately reports HDZ's response to the alleged fake message. It includes direct quotes from HDZ's official statement and aligns with the cross-source consensus.
Why objectivity (85): The article maintains a neutral tone throughout, presenting facts without taking sides. It avoids emotional language and focuses on the content of HDZ's response.
Večernji listIndependentConservativeFactual 95Objective 808/30/2026The article reports that the Croatian Democratic Union (HDZ) has denied being behind a controversial message circulating online, which urges supporters to attack groups and individuals associated with the radical left during an upcoming protest against waste management issues in Lika. The message, attributed to the HDZ's 'media team,' instructs followers to engage in aggressive rhetoric against 'extreme leftists, anti-Heratians, Yugoslavs, and haters of everything that is Croatian.' HDZ claims this is an attempt by activists to shift blame onto them, arguing that the left wing is increasingly seen as trying to exploit the protest for political gain. The article states that the left has faced setbacks, including failed protests like the Rijeka Nepravda demonstration and the Balkan March, and now seeks to co-opt civil initiatives like the Gospić initiative. HDZ asserts that these fabricated messages aim to distract the public from the true issue, waste management, and highlight the lack of concern for citizens’ well-being.
Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the controversy around the alleged involvement of HDZ in inciting anti-left rhetoric, portraying the left as irresponsible and politically motivated. It emphasizes the perceived failure of leftist movements and suggests that their attempts to co-opt civil initiatives are disingenu
Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports HDZ's response to the alleged fake message circulating online. It includes direct quotes from HDZ's official statement and aligns with the cross-source consensus.
Why objectivity (80): The article presents HDZ's perspective neutrally, avoiding emotional language and providing both sides of the argument. It remains objective in its reporting of the incident.
N1 HrvatskaIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 758/31/2026 Dalija Orešković: "Protest for Gospić - this is an anti-Hades protest"Dalija Orešković, hrvatska saborska zastupnica, navela je da je najavljeni prosvjed za Gospić najvažniji politički događaj od dobivanja samostalnosti Hrvatske. Prosvjed, koji će se održati 5. rujna u Zagrebu, označen je kao 'antihadezeovski', što ukazuje na njegovu ciljanost prema političkoj strukturi koja, prema njoj, uzrokuje problem ilegala odlaganja otpada. Orešković ističe da je Hrvatska postala odlagalište europskog otpada bez razvoja infrastrukture za komunalni otpad, a da je vlast znala o tome godinama. Ona također upozorava na potencijalnu opasnost od 'otova' – smatra da je otpad zakopan u Gospiću, ali i u vladi i ministarstvima. Izrazila je bojazan za nastavak službene istrage i ulogu glavnog državnog odvjetnika.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the protest as a nationalistic and anti-establishment movement, emphasizing its importance as a democratic struggle against corruption and environmental degradation. The language used by Orešković suggests a strong critique of the current political system and a call for collective
Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports Dalija Orešković's comments on the protest, including her characterization of it as an anti-HDZ protest. It provides direct quotes and contextualizes the issue within broader political themes, aligning with the primary source document.
Why objectivity (75): The article presents Orešković's views with a certain level of enthusiasm and emphasis on the political implications, which could be seen as slightly biased. However, it remains largely objective in its reporting.
Telegram.hrIndependentConservativeFactual 85Objective 758/30/2026A fake message attributed to the HDZ (Croatian conservative party) has been circulating online, instructing supporters on how to respond to an upcoming protest in Gospić related to waste management. The message urges participants to attack 'extreme leftists,' 'anti-Heretics,' and others who oppose Croatian national interests. The HDZ has denied responsibility, calling the message 'amateurish sabotage' and accusing the left of trying to co-opt the protest for their own political gain. They argue that the left failed previous protests and now seeks to undermine the current initiative by falsely associating it with HDZ. The protest, titled 'Hodaj za Liku, hodaj za Hrvatsku,' is scheduled for September 5th in Zagreb.
Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the protest as a legitimate civic initiative being undermined by the left, which the HDZ accuses of attempting to co-opt it for political purposes. The language used to describe the left ('extreme leftists,' 'parasitic workers') carries a negative tone, aligning with right-wing or
Why factuality (85): The article accurately describes the HDZ's response to the circulated message, including the content of the message and the claim that it was fabricated. It cites the source of the message (ZADAR News) and includes direct quotes from HDZ's statement. This aligns well with the primary source document
Why objectivity (75): The article maintains a neutral tone but does present the HDZ's position as the authoritative one, potentially giving more weight to their narrative than others. There is some subtle bias in the interpretation of the situation.
N1 HrvatskaIndependentProgressiveFactual 80Objective 709/1/2026 Kovačević: At one point, the play of the HDZ-Sopran concept of the circular economy beganThe article mentions Božo Kovačević, a former ambassador to Russia and former minister of environment, who participated in a program on 'Novo Dnevno' where he discussed various topics including Serbia, the death of Ratko Mladić, and waste management issues in Gospić. The headline suggests a critique of the HDZ (Croatian Democratic Union)-led interpretation of a circular economy, implying a political stance against certain policies. However, the content of the article does not provide detailed information on the discussion or the specific arguments related to the circular economy.
Bias read (Progressive): The headline implies criticism of the HDZ's approach to the circular economy, which could suggest a left-leaning perspective. While the article does not explicitly state this, the framing of the discussion around environmental policies and potential critiques of conservative economic approaches may傾
Why factuality (80): This article accurately reports the claim by HDZ that the messages circulating online are an amateur attempt by radical left-wing groups. It provides direct quotes from HDZ’s official response and details the content of the alleged message. It aligns closely with the primary source document regardin
Why objectivity (70): While the article presents the HDZ's stance clearly, it frames the issue as a conflict between HDZ and radical leftist groups, which could be seen as slightly biased. However, it remains relatively neutral in its reporting.
Telegram.hrIndependentProgressiveFactual 80Objective 708/31/2026 Dalija Orešković after Thompson in Vukovar: I am desperate and sad because I was right a year agoDalija Orešković, saborska zastupnica i predsjednica stranke DOSIP, komentirala je prosvjed protiv opasnog otpada u Gospiću u emisiji televizije N1. Ona je naglasila da je prosvjed važan politički događaj i da se radi o anti-HDZ-ovskom pokretu, bez obzira na lijevi ili desni položaj sudionika. Orešković je upozorila da je problem ilegalnih odlagališta široko rasprostranjen diljem Hrvatske, navodeći podatke o više od tri i pol milijuna tona otpada unesenog u Hrvatsku iz inozemstva od 2016. do 2019., većinom nelegalnog. Uz to, ona je izrazila sumnju u objavljene nalaze i kritizirala premijera Andreja Plenkovića za pokušaj dedramatiziranja problema.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the protest against illegal waste dumps as an 'anti-HDZ' movement, positions Orešković as critical of the ruling HDZ party, and emphasizes environmental issues as a political struggle rather than a technical or administrative issue. The language used suggests a clear ideological立场
Why factuality (80): The article accurately reports Orešković's comments on the protest, including her critique of the government and the environmental issues. It provides direct quotes and contextualizes the issue within her political platform, aligning with the primary source document.
Why objectivity (70): The tone is supportive of Orešković's stance, highlighting her concerns about the government and the environment. While not overtly biased, there is a subtle preference for her perspective.
Index.hrIndependentConservativeFactual 75Objective 658/30/2026The Croatian Democratic Union (HDZ), Croatia's ruling party, has denounced a WhatsApp message circulating on social media, claiming it was fabricated and part of an amateur effort by the radical left to undermine a planned protest. The message allegedly instructed members to attack individuals supporting the 'Hodaj za Liku, hodaj za Hrvatsku' (Walk for Love, Walk for Croatia) demonstration using fake profiles. The message, which claimed to come from the top of the HDZ, urged supporters to engage in online harassment against those they deemed 'extreme leftists,' 'anti-Heretics,' and others. The message was shared by journalist Hrvoje Bajlo of ZADAR News, who called it malicious and illiterate. HDZ claims the message is a fabrication meant to divert attention from their alleged failure to address issues like waste management in Gospić. They accuse the radical left of trying to co-opt the protest for political gain. The protest, organized by a citizens' initiative, aims to highlight environmental concerns in Gospić and is scheduled for September 5th in Zagreb.
Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the protest and the alleged fake message as efforts by the radical left to destabilize civic action, implying that the left is politically motivated and manipulative. The language used to describe the left as 'radical' and 'trying to hijack' a legitimate civic movement carries a右翼
Why factuality (75): The article discusses the potential impact of the waste issue on HDZ, citing expert opinions and providing background on the environmental concerns. It references the growing support for the protest and the seriousness of the issue, which aligns with the primary source document. However, it lacks de
Why objectivity (65): The tone leans towards emphasizing the significance of the issue and the potential threat to HDZ, which may suggest a slight political bias. The article frames the protest as having national importance, possibly influencing reader perception.
Večernji listIndependentProgressiveFactual 70Objective 609/1/2026 The waste affair could be unlike any that HDZ has ever survived.The article discusses a growing civil protest against illegal and hazardous waste dumping in Gospić, Croatia, which has been occurring for decades. The waste, primarily toxic, has been illegally transported into the area and dumped in nature reserves, raising concerns over environmental contamination of land and water. The protest, organized by the citizens' initiative 'Gospić je naš dom,' is gaining support daily. Four political analysts agree that this issue could be more significant than previous scandals involving the ruling HDZ party. They highlight the symbolic weight of environmental protection in Croatia and warn that if this becomes part of a broader pattern, it could lead to serious consequences for the ruling party. Analysts suggest that the ruling party may attempt to deflect blame and divide responsibility, but they acknowledge the potential for increased public pressure and mobilization against them.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the waste scandal as a significant threat to the ruling party, emphasizing the potential for widespread public mobilization and environmental symbolism. It highlights the role of citizen initiatives and criticizes the ruling party's attempts to deflect blame, suggesting a leftward
Why factuality (70): The article discusses the waste issue and the upcoming protest, quoting political analysts and referencing the environmental impact. It provides general information about the issue and the expected turnout, though it doesn't cite specific data or sources for the analysts' comments.
Why objectivity (60): The article has a somewhat promotional tone, especially when discussing the potential impact of the protest. It emphasizes the national importance of the issue, which could be interpreted as a form of editorializing.
Net.hrIndependentProgressiveFactual 65Objective 559/1/2026Communications expert Krešimir Macan comments on the politicization of protests in Croatia, particularly regarding claims that participants are 'anti-Heritage' or 'anti-Croatian.' He discusses the challenges of organizing large demonstrations in Zagreb, noting logistical difficulties and skepticism about turnout. Macan criticizes the HDZ for allegedly spreading messages labeling protesters as anti-Heritage and Yugoslav supporters, while acknowledging similar tactics from other right-wing groups. He compares these actions to the influence of Serbian leaders like Vučić, who gained popularity through effective communication. The discussion highlights divisions within political parties and the lack of consensus on environmental issues, such as waste disposal in Gospić. Macan argues that the protest against pollution is not inherently anti-Croatian but rather a reaction to poor waste management practices across the country.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the controversy around the labeling of protesters as 'anti-Heritage' by right-wing figures, suggesting this is a politically motivated tactic to undermine the movement. It critiques the HDZ and other conservative groups for using divisive rhetoric, while praising more articulate,左
Why factuality (65): Article discusses a political commentary on the protest against illegal waste dumping in Gospić, referencing a communication strategy by Krešimir Macan. It references the involvement of public figures and mentions the HDZ's denial of a directive. While it aligns with the primary source document rega
Why objectivity (55): The tone is somewhat biased towards criticizing the HDZ and suggesting political manipulation. The article uses emotionally charged language such as 'antihrvatsko' and implies political polarization, showing a clear leaning toward one perspective.
N1 HrvatskaIndependentProgressiveFactual 65Objective 558/31/2026 Dalija Orešković: "It will be a trial for Gospić, it is anti-Hades"The article features a conversation between journalist Nine Kljenak and MP Dalija Orešković discussing the illegal delay of waste disposal in Gospić and the planned protest as a result. The discussion highlights concerns over environmental issues and local governance. The article includes calls for reader engagement through comments and social media follow-ups, but does not provide detailed information on the specifics of the protest or broader implications.
Bias read (Progressive): The article focuses on a political figure (MP Dalija Orešković) addressing an issue related to local governance and environmental policies. While the content itself is factual, the emphasis on the protest as 'antihadezeovski' (anti-Hadžić) suggests alignment with opposition views against certain pro
Why factuality (65): The article discusses the political alignment of Most and the HDZ, referencing the alleged message and the political consequences. It lacks specific citations and relies on indirect claims, making it less aligned with the primary source document.
Why objectivity (55): The article has a strong political bias, presenting Most as being influenced by radical left-wing forces and implying a threat to the state. The tone is highly critical of the political group and suggests a negative agenda.
Index.hrIndependentConservativeFactual 50Objective 358/31/2026 How the Mostovians Became Leftists and YugoslavsThe article criticizes the political group 'Most' for shifting towards the left and Yugoslav nationalism, accusing them of undermining the state. It highlights the lack of political consistency within the group, pointing out their inconsistent messaging and appearance during public appearances. The piece then shifts focus to environmental issues, specifically illegal waste dumping in Lika, which poses a threat to the HDZ party. It mentions the involvement of former HDZ member Andrija Mikulić, who was implicated in corruption, and questions the party’s responsibility for allowing illegal waste transportation. The article further discusses the broader implications of political decisions, using the example of whether math should be taught in schools, suggesting that some issues transcend left-right politics. Finally, it raises concerns about the misuse of algorithms by social media platforms.
Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the shift of 'Most' toward the left as problematic and dangerous, implying that such moves threaten national stability. It portrays the HDZ as being under threat from environmental issues linked to political negligence, and criticizes the party's leadership for failing to hold its
Why factuality (50): This article appears to be incomplete and lacks clear connection to the primary source document. It discusses political party behavior and style, which is unrelated to the waste management issue mentioned in the primary source. There is no evidence of alignment with the primary source content or any
Why objectivity (35): The article has a strongly biased tone, focusing on negative portrayals of political groups without presenting balanced viewpoints. The language is emotive and lacks objectivity.
Croatia
