About 100 pilgrims from Tamil Nadu still untraceable, says min Rajmohan
The article reports that approximately 100 pilgrims from Tamil Nadu remain untraceable, according to Minister Rajmohan. The information was provided by the minister during a statement, highlighting concerns over the safety and whereabouts of these individuals. The situation appears to be part of a larger issue related to missing persons among pilgrims, which has raised questions about coordination between authorities and the effectiveness of search efforts. No further details were provided regarding the circumstances leading to the disappearance or the steps being taken to locate the individuals.
Twenty-one pilgrims from Tamil Nadu who survived a deadly flash flood in Nepal's Rasuya region have arrived safely in Delhi. The group, part of a larger contingent of 57 pilgrims who embarked on the Kailash Manasarovar Yatra from Tamil Nadu via a travel agency in Kumbakonam, were rescued following the disaster and returned to India. The survivors landed at Delhi’s Indira Gandhi International Airport and were greeted by External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar, who expressed gratitude for the successful operation and acknowledged the efforts of the Nepali Army and the Indian Embassy in Kathmandu. The incident unfolded on Wednesday when heavy rains triggered flash floods in the Rasuya region, leaving 36 people missing after two of the three buses carrying the pilgrims were swept away. The remaining 21 survivors were temporarily housed in camps at an Armed Police Force outpost near Timure, approximately 160 kilometers north of Kathmandu. The government in Tamil Nadu dispatched a four-member team of state ministers to New Delhi to oversee the rescue efforts and coordinate the return of over 80 individuals still stranded in Nepal. This team included ministers Aadhav Arjuna, A Rajmohan, R Vinoth, and Thangam Thennarasu, who visited a control room established at Tamil Nadu House to assess the situation and meet the surviving pilgrims. Navu Kabirdoss, one of the returnees, stated that while he was relieved to be back, there were 40 additional members of his group who remained out of contact. Minister Rajmohan confirmed that approximately 83 pilgrims from Tamil Nadu and Puducherry were still missing, with over 100 pilgrims from Tamil Nadu untraceable. The state delegation also met with Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri to discuss ongoing rescue operations, during which the control room in Tamil Nadu received over 900 calls in just two days. In a recent address to the state assembly, Rajmohan noted that 106 pilgrims, including three from Puducherry, had traveled to Nepal for the yatra in multiple groups. Separately, 28 pilgrims from Andhra Pradesh, Telangana, and Karnataka also narrowly avoided the disaster. These travelers attributed their survival to a combination of factors, including a brief tea break and a 10-minute delay that allowed them to avoid the flooded Syabrubesi bridge. Managing director Pemmasani Venkataramana of Sign In Travels recounted how the group’s driver acted swiftly upon receiving an alert about the impending flood, taking a detour to ensure their safety. Another pilgrim, Krishnaiah Muthyala, highlighted that a three-day delay in visa processing inadvertently postponed their journey, potentially saving their lives. Pilgrim Kalpana described the harrowing scenes witnessed during the evacuation, noting that several buses carrying pilgrims from Kolkata were swept away by the floodwaters. Despite the chaos, the group managed to return safely to Kathmandu. Meanwhile, officials in Andhra Pradesh Bhavan confirmed that Bhaskar Shastry and three others from Kurnool district, part of a 144-member group, have safely reached Nyalam County. Arrangements are in place for their return to Kathmandu through the Kodari border, with a confirmed flight from Kathmandu to New Delhi scheduled for September 1. Officials emphasized close coordination with the Ministry of External Affairs to locate and assist those still stranded in Nepal.
Advertisement
3 reports
NDTVParty-alignedCenterFactual 85Objective 709 days ago
Twenty-one pilgrims from Tamil Nadu safely returned home after a harrowing experience in Nepal. Their journey back was described as a 'second birth,' highlighting the relief and emotional significance of their return. The group had faced significant challenges during their time in Nepal, though specific details of their ordeal were not provided in the excerpt. Their safe return has been widely noted as a miraculous escape, emphasizing the dangers they encountered and their eventual successful repatriation.
Bias read (Center): The article focuses on the personal experience of the pilgrims and their safe return, without overtly favoring any political stance or ideology. It does not engage in partisan commentary or present information that would suggest a clear ideological leaning.
Why factuality (85): The article correctly identifies the 21 Tamil Nadu pilgrims as having been rescued from Nepal floods and returned home. However, it adds the phrase 'miraculous escape' which is not explicitly supported by the other sources, though it does not contradict them either.
Why objectivity (70): The title and opening sentence use emotionally charged language such as 'miraculous escape' and 'second birth,' which introduces a biased and subjective tone. This framing emphasizes drama and emotion rather than presenting a neutral account of events.
NDTVParty-alignedCenterFactual 65Objective 707 days ago
An article reports that over 80 pilgrims from Tamil Nadu are missing after flash floods in Nepal, while 21 of the 57 individuals who traveled through the Super Yathira agency in Kumbakonam have returned home safely. The incident highlights concerns about safety during religious travel and the impact of extreme weather conditions. The article mentions the involvement of a specific travel agency but does not provide further details on the circumstances of the missing pilgrims or the extent of the disaster.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information regarding the number of pilgrims affected by the flood without overtly favoring any political stance. It focuses on the humanitarian aspect and does not engage in ideological framing or commentary beyond reporting the event.
Why factuality (65): The article provides specific details about the return of 21 Tamil Nadu pilgrims and mentions the involvement of the Super Yathira agency. However, it lacks comprehensive information about the overall scale of the disaster or the rescue efforts. It does not reference the primary source document dire
Why objectivity (70): The article maintains a neutral tone, focusing on the safe return of pilgrims and providing factual details about their journey. It avoids overtly biased language and presents the situation in a straightforward manner.
The PrintIndependentCenterFactual 65Objective 708 days ago
The article reports that approximately 100 pilgrims from Tamil Nadu remain untraceable, according to Minister Rajmohan. The information was provided by the minister during a statement, highlighting concerns over the safety and whereabouts of these individuals. The situation appears to be part of a larger issue related to missing persons among pilgrims, which has raised questions about coordination between authorities and the effectiveness of search efforts. No further details were provided regarding the circumstances leading to the disappearance or the steps being taken to locate the individuals.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information based on a statement from a government official without overtly endorsing or criticizing any particular political stance. It focuses on the issue of missing pilgrims and the response from the ministry, without taking a clear ideological position. The framing,
Why factuality (65): The article reports that approximately 100 pilgrims from Tamil Nadu remain untraceable, citing the statement of Minister Rajmohan. Since no primary source document is available, factuality is assessed based on cross-source consensus. This claim appears to align with broader reports on the issue, tho
Why objectivity (70): The article presents the information neutrally, quoting the minister's statement without apparent bias. However, it lacks additional context or perspectives, which slightly reduces objectivity.
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.
India
