ON
← Back to feed
Moolenaar presses Trump admin to confirm chip due-diligence rule still stands amid loophole fears
United States🏛️ PoliticsConservativeOverlooked by progressives12 days ago

Moolenaar presses Trump admin to confirm chip due-diligence rule still stands amid loophole fears

House Select Committee on China Chairman John Moolenaar is urging the Trump administration to confirm that the Foundry Due Diligence Rule, which requires chipmakers to vet customers before exporting advanced AI chips, is still active. He warns that uncertainty around the rule's enforcement could allow Chinese companies like Huawei to exploit loopholes by using shell companies such as Sophgo to bypass restrictions. The rule was part of the previously unenforced AI Diffusion Rule, which the U.S. decided not to enforce in May 2025. Moolenaar highlights concerns that China has used the lack of clear guidelines to access U.S. technology through third-party subsidiaries. In his letter to Under Secretary of Commerce Jeffrey Kessler, he calls for explicit clarification that the worldwide license requirement remains in place and suggests rescinding the AI Diffusion Rule while establishing a separate framework. He also requests a briefing on the Bureau of Industry and Security’s actions related to enforcing the rule.

A top House Republican has urged former President Donald Trump to ensure that rules restricting the export of advanced AI chips to China remain in place, particularly targeting companies like Huawei. Rep. John Moolenaar, chairman of the House Select Committee on China, sent a letter to the Commerce Department under the Trump administration, emphasizing the importance of maintaining these restrictions to prevent Chinese entities from acquiring cutting-edge U.S. technology. Moolenaar’s letter addressed concerns over a potential loophole in current regulations that could allow Chinese firms to bypass export controls through intermediaries. He specifically highlighted the need for the Trump administration to formally confirm that the Foundry Due Diligence Rule, introduced in January 2025, continues to apply. This rule mandates that chip manufacturers conduct thorough checks on their customers before exporting advanced AI chips, aiming to block unauthorized transfers to high-risk jurisdictions. The Foundry Due Diligence Rule was initially part of a broader regulation known as the AI Diffusion Rule, which sought to limit the global spread of AI technology. However, in May 2025, the U.S. government announced it would not enforce this wider rule, raising questions about the status of its components, including the Foundry Due Diligence Rule. Some industry observers have speculated that the absence of enforcement might lead chipmakers to assume the rule is no longer active, potentially creating new vulnerabilities. In his letter, Moolenaar commended recent guidance issued by the Commerce Department that clarified licensing requirements for end users in Country Group D:5, a list of nations deemed high-risk for weapons proliferation, and Macau, a semi-autonomous region of China. He noted that China had previously exploited gaps in due diligence processes by using third-party subsidiaries to acquire advanced chips illegally. Moolenaar emphasized that the Foundry Due Diligence Rule is crucial in preventing the Chinese Communist Party from gaining access to high-end U.S. semiconductors and safeguarding American technological superiority. In his communication, he proposed that the Trump administration issue specific guidance confirming the continued applicability of the worldwide license requirement for front-end fabricators. Additionally, he recommended formally revoking the AI Diffusion Rule and revising it to establish a separate worldwide licensing framework. The letter also included a request for a detailed briefing by the end of the month from the Bureau of Industry and Security, focusing on their strategies and decisions related to clarifying the Foundry Due Diligence Rule. Moolenaar asked for information on any ongoing investigations into instances where chips were diverted due to non-compliance with existing regulations. Huawei, a major Chinese technology firm, has been prohibited from purchasing advanced U.S.-linked chips since 2020 due to national security concerns. Despite these restrictions, Huawei circumvented some limitations by establishing a subsidiary named Sophgo in China to procure approximately $500 million worth of chips. The Foundry Due Diligence Rule was designed to address such loopholes by imposing stricter scrutiny on customer verification processes for chip exports. The situation underscores the complexities surrounding international trade policies and the challenges faced by regulatory bodies in enforcing export controls effectively. As discussions continue around the future of these regulations, stakeholders are closely monitoring developments to assess how they might impact both domestic and global semiconductor markets.

2 reports

The Washington Times logoThe Washington TimesParty-alignedConservativeFactual 85Objective 6512 days ago
Moolenaar presses Trump admin to confirm chip due-diligence rule still stands amid loophole fears

House Select Committee on China Chairman John Moolenaar is urging the Trump administration to confirm that the Foundry Due Diligence Rule, which requires chipmakers to vet customers before exporting advanced AI chips, is still active. He warns that uncertainty around the rule's enforcement could allow Chinese companies like Huawei to exploit loopholes by using shell companies such as Sophgo to bypass restrictions. The rule was part of the previously unenforced AI Diffusion Rule, which the U.S. decided not to enforce in May 2025. Moolenaar highlights concerns that China has used the lack of clear guidelines to access U.S. technology through third-party subsidiaries. In his letter to Under Secretary of Commerce Jeffrey Kessler, he calls for explicit clarification that the worldwide license requirement remains in place and suggests rescinding the AI Diffusion Rule while establishing a separate framework. He also requests a briefing on the Bureau of Industry and Security’s actions related to enforcing the rule.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the issue as a national security concern, emphasizing the threat posed by China's potential access to U.S. technology. It uses terms like 'Chinese Communist Party' and 'high-end U.S. chips' to highlight perceived risks, aligning with conservative narratives about protecting U.S.科技

Why factuality (85): The article provides detailed information about the Foundry Due Diligence Rule and its potential loopholes, aligning with the cross-source consensus that the rule was established in January 2025 and that the AI Diffusion Rule was unenforced. It mentions Huawei's actions and the setup of Sophgo, whic

Why objectivity (65): The article has a clear pro-American/anti-China bias, using terms like 'Chinese Communist Party' and emphasizing the need to preserve 'America’s technological edge.' The tone is assertive and frames the issue as a critical national security concern, showing a lack of neutrality.

Quartz logoQuartzIndependentConservativeFactual 75Objective 8013 days ago
A top House Republican is urging Trump to enforce AI chip rules aimed at Huawei

Rep. John Moolenaar, a top House Republican, has urged former President Donald Trump to enforce regulations targeting Huawei by implementing Biden-era rules restricting the export of advanced U.S. semiconductors to Chinese companies. These rules aim to limit China's access to cutting-edge American technology, particularly focusing on semiconductor manufacturing. Moolenaar emphasized the importance of these measures in countering China's technological advancements. The letter highlights concerns over national security and economic competition, suggesting that enforcing such restrictions could strengthen U.S. strategic advantages.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the enforcement of AI chip rules as a critical measure against China, aligning with a conservative stance on national security and economic protectionism. The emphasis on urging Trump to act suggests a preference for stricter regulatory actions against perceived threats, which is

Why factuality (75): The article reports on a letter from Rep. John Moolenaar to the Commerce Department regarding AI chip rules aimed at Huawei. It aligns with the cross-source consensus that these rules were part of Biden-era policies intended to restrict Chinese access to advanced semiconductors. The claim about the

Why objectivity (80): The article presents the content of the letter without apparent bias, using neutral language to describe Rep. Moolenaar's position. It does not take sides on the effectiveness or morality of the policy, maintaining a balanced tone.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories