House Select Committee on China Chairman John Moolenaar is urging the Trump administration to confirm that the Foundry Due Diligence Rule, which requires chipmakers to vet customers before exporting advanced AI chips, is still active. He warns that uncertainty around the rule's enforcement could allow Chinese companies like Huawei to exploit loopholes by using shell companies such as Sophgo to bypass restrictions. The rule was part of the previously unenforced AI Diffusion Rule, which the U.S. decided not to enforce in May 2025. Moolenaar highlights concerns that China has used the lack of clear guidelines to access U.S. technology through third-party subsidiaries. In his letter to Under Secretary of Commerce Jeffrey Kessler, he calls for explicit clarification that the worldwide license requirement remains in place and suggests rescinding the AI Diffusion Rule while establishing a separate framework. He also requests a briefing on the Bureau of Industry and Security’s actions related to enforcing the rule.
Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the issue as a national security concern, emphasizing the threat posed by China's potential access to U.S. technology. It uses terms like 'Chinese Communist Party' and 'high-end U.S. chips' to highlight perceived risks, aligning with conservative narratives about protecting U.S.科技
Why factuality (85): The article provides detailed information about the Foundry Due Diligence Rule and its potential loopholes, aligning with the cross-source consensus that the rule was established in January 2025 and that the AI Diffusion Rule was unenforced. It mentions Huawei's actions and the setup of Sophgo, whic
Why objectivity (65): The article has a clear pro-American/anti-China bias, using terms like 'Chinese Communist Party' and emphasizing the need to preserve 'America’s technological edge.' The tone is assertive and frames the issue as a critical national security concern, showing a lack of neutrality.





