ON
← Back to feed
A New Jersey News Outlet Asks the Courts To Stop a Judge's Censorship
United States🏛️ PoliticsCenter8 hr. ago

A New Jersey News Outlet Asks the Courts To Stop a Judge's Censorship

A New Jersey news outlet, New Brunswick Today, is challenging a court order that restricts its ability to report on a school lockdown incident involving a 16-year-old student who brought an airsoft pistol to New Brunswick High School on May 8. The order, issued by Judge Thomas D. McCloskey, prevents the outlet and all journalists in the U.S. from publishing the student’s identity or unaltered security camera footage of the event. The outlet argues this constitutes an unconstitutional prior restraint on free speech, citing Supreme Court precedents that have consistently rejected such restrictions unless they involve extreme threats like national security. The court initially ordered the removal of the video and prohibited future posts of similar footage, but later revised the order to allow descriptions of the video while requiring the redaction of student identities. The outlet now seeks to overturn the order through an appeal.

Go to the primary sources (3)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

1 reports

Reason logoReasonParty-alignedCenter8 hr. ago
A New Jersey News Outlet Asks the Courts To Stop a Judge's Censorship

A New Jersey news outlet, New Brunswick Today, is challenging a court order that restricts its ability to report on a school lockdown incident involving a 16-year-old student who brought an airsoft pistol to New Brunswick High School on May 8. The order, issued by Judge Thomas D. McCloskey, prevents the outlet and all journalists in the U.S. from publishing the student’s identity or unaltered security camera footage of the event. The outlet argues this constitutes an unconstitutional prior restraint on free speech, citing Supreme Court precedents that have consistently rejected such restrictions unless they involve extreme threats like national security. The court initially ordered the removal of the video and prohibited future posts of similar footage, but later revised the order to allow descriptions of the video while requiring the redaction of student identities. The outlet now seeks to overturn the order through an appeal.

Bias read (Center): The article presents both sides of the issue, detailing the legal arguments made by the news outlet against the court order and acknowledging the context of the lawsuit filed by the school board. It cites constitutional principles and references relevant legal precedents without overtly favoring one.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories