ON
← Back to feed
I'm back from the year 2118: a mysterious man talks about World War III, AI and the secrets of the CIA.
BG🏛️ Politicsyesterday

I'm back from the year 2118: a mysterious man talks about World War III, AI and the secrets of the CIA.

The article discusses a man named Alexander Smith who claims to have traveled back in time from 2118 to the present. He describes a dystopian future where artificial intelligence controls the world, a global war between the US and North Korea involving Russia, and secret technologies controlled by the CIA, including a 'time machine'. Smith, dressed in a strange mask, presents these claims as revelations from his time-travel experience. However, he provides no evidence to support his assertions, nor proof that he has worked for the CIA or visited the year 2118. The interview, originally aired on YouTube in 2018, resurfaced recently online, sparking renewed interest. The piece highlights the sensational nature of the claims while noting their lack of substantiation.

1 reports

Dnes.bg logoDnes.bgIndependentCenteryesterday
I'm back from the year 2118: a mysterious man talks about World War III, AI and the secrets of the CIA.

The article discusses a man named Alexander Smith who claims to have traveled back in time from 2118 to the present. He describes a dystopian future where artificial intelligence controls the world, a global war between the US and North Korea involving Russia, and secret technologies controlled by the CIA, including a 'time machine'. Smith, dressed in a strange mask, presents these claims as revelations from his time-travel experience. However, he provides no evidence to support his assertions, nor proof that he has worked for the CIA or visited the year 2118. The interview, originally aired on YouTube in 2018, resurfaced recently online, sparking renewed interest. The piece highlights the sensational nature of the claims while noting their lack of substantiation.

Bias read (Center): While the content involves speculative claims about future geopolitics and technology, the article does not take a clear ideological stance. It presents both the claims made by the individual and the skepticism surrounding them without overtly favoring one perspective over another. The framing is un

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories