Mijić was frightened, and after the article was published, he withdrew the advertisements for new employees.

NecenzuriranoIndependentProgressiveFactual 95Objective 70

The article reports on a controversy involving Slovenian parliamentarian Boris Mijič, whose company Progros has allegedly欠款 over ten thousand euros to employees and the state. Despite these financial issues, Mijič's wife has recently posted three job advertisements seeking up to 25 workers for construction-related tasks, offering gross wages of around 3,500 euros per month—significantly higher than the national average. When contacted by journalists, Mijič claimed he was not listed as the contact person in the job postings and denied involvement in running his wife’s business, which is now operating independently in the construction sector. The article highlights discrepancies between Mijič’s public statements and the publicly available information, including the fact that he was indeed listed as the contact person in all three job ads.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames Mijič’s actions in a manner that suggests hypocrisy or inconsistency, particularly regarding his alleged failure to pay employees while simultaneously offering high wages to new hires. It emphasizes the discrepancy between his public denial and the evidence presented (such as the

Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 70): High factual accuracy based on primary source document and cross-source consensus. However, the article has a clear bias against Mijič, using emotionally charged language like 'exploited workers' and implying guilt without sufficient evidence.

N1 SlovenijaIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 7511 days ago

Zoran Stevanović, president of the National Assembly and leader of the Resnica party, met with three employees of the Progros company who had not received their salaries. He stated he would cover their unpaid wages from his personal savings, calling it an act of humanity rather than manipulation. The employees were reportedly left without pay by Boris Mijič, a former director and current MP of Resnica, who allegedly forged their signatures on resignation forms and failed to report them to the Pension Insurance Agency. Mijič is under investigation by the Anti-Corruption Commission. Stevanović emphasized that if Mijič fails to settle his debts or is found guilty of any charges, he will lose his position as an MP.

Bias read (Progressive): The article highlights the actions of Zoran Stevanović, a prominent left-wing politician, who personally covers the unpaid wages of workers affected by a fellow party member. It emphasizes themes of social responsibility and ethical conduct within the party, which aligns with left-leaning values. S轻

Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 75): The article accurately reports the event and quotes Stevanović's statements directly from the primary source. It includes details about Mijič being a former director and mentions media coverage. However, it lacks some context from the original text, such as Alukić’s strong criticism and the cultural

Maribor24IndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 7516 days ago

The article discusses Zoran Stevanović's statement regarding Resni.ca's decision not to sign the Partnership for Development agreement offered by Prime Minister Janez Janša. Stevanović explained that after careful consideration at all levels of their party, they decided not to sign the agreement because they saw no meaningful purpose in it. He emphasized that the party would support initiatives beneficial to Slovenia and reject those not aligned with their program. Despite being satisfied with the offer, they concluded there was no specific reason to sign the agreement, which they viewed as purely formal with no substantive content. Stevanović noted that their decision does not require justification to any other party.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a neutral account of Resni.ca's decision-making process and reasoning behind rejecting the partnership agreement. It includes direct quotes from Stevanović without apparent bias or loaded language, providing balanced context about the party's stance and rationale.

Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 75): High factual alignment with the primary source on Mijič’s party position. Objectivity is maintained through balanced reporting of party decisions.

Info360IndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 7015 days ago

The article discusses an episode of the show 'Ura resnice' where commentator Bernard Nežmah and Petra Gregorčič analyze recent political developments in Slovenia. They note that the opposition has intensified criticism against the Resni.ca party, particularly after revelations about unpaid debts to workers. Nežmah warns that this anti-establishment rhetoric pushes the party closer to the right and makes it part of the ruling coalition. He highlights the growing influence of State Assembly Speaker Zoran Stevanović, who, despite having only five deputies, is becoming a significant political figure. The segment also examines a public opinion poll by Mediana showing 44% of people oppose the government post-election, which Gregorčič attributes to reflecting the parliamentary composition. The discussion includes criticism of the Democratic Party for low support due to failed promises, including the SKOK initiative. The show airs every Tuesday and Friday at 8 PM and can be streamed on YouTube, Spotify, and Apple Podcasts.

Bias read (Center): While the article covers politically charged topics such as opposition tactics, party dynamics, and public opinion, it presents multiple perspectives without overtly favoring any side. It includes commentary from both Nežmah and Gregorčič, offering balanced insights into the political landscape. The

Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 70): This article details discussions between Progros and construction firms regarding payment disputes. It references informal sources and provides specific figures. While informative, it maintains a slightly critical tone towards Mijič’s financial situation.

NecenzuriranoIndependentProgressiveFactual 80Objective 65

Following an article published by Necenzurirano.si, MP Boris Mijič from the Resni.ca party removed job advertisements he had placed for new employees. The ads promised high salaries for construction-related jobs, significantly above the national average. Mijič's company, Progros, has been in financial trouble and owes money to former employees and the state. The ads were initially attributed to a contact person named Boris, but after the article was published, Mijič clarified that his wife had posted them. His wife transitioned from a cosmetics business to construction during the previous year. The Employment Agency confirmed that they did not know who posted the ads until after the article was published. They noted that the form used for posting the ads lacked full names of the contacts, which led to confusion. Additionally, the Labor Inspectorate previously banned Progros from hiring foreign workers due to unpaid wages and contributions. Despite these issues, Mijič managed to post the ads through his wife, indicating possible legal loopholes or avoidance strategies.

Bias read (Progressive): The article highlights potential misconduct by a politician, focusing on his company's financial troubles, unpaid wages, and legal issues. It frames the situation critically towards Mijič, emphasizing his avoidance of responsibilities and the implications of his actions. The tone suggests scrutiny,

Why these scores (Factual 80 · Objective 65): The article reports on Boris Mijič withdrawing job ads after a publication, but includes some speculative details about his financial situation. It maintains a somewhat neutral tone but leans towards critical reporting of Mijič’s business practices.

NecenzuriranoIndependentProgressiveFactual 80Objective 65

The article discusses financial issues involving MP Boris Mijič, director of the failing company Progros, which owes tens of thousands of euros to former employees and the state. It reports that Mijič has secured an agreement with companies Kolektor Koling and CGP to pay approximately €32,000 for unpaid work related to the construction of the Dobrunje prison project. This amount is nearly equal to the tax debt his company owes to the Financial Administration (Furs). However, this payment does not address the debts owed to former workers. The article notes that Mijič was working on a railway station project in Ljubljana while serving as an MP, which is against regulations, and he continued working through his spouse’s self-employed business. The article highlights the discrepancy between Mijič receiving funds and the lack of resolution for his company's outstanding obligations to employees.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the situation critically toward Mijič, highlighting his financial mismanagement, potential conflicts of interest, and failure to resolve debts to former employees. The tone emphasizes accountability and criticism of Mijič's actions, suggesting a left-leaning perspective focused on

Why these scores (Factual 80 · Objective 65): The article accurately reports the financial arrangements involving Progros but uses emotionally charged language when discussing Mijič's actions, which affects objectivity.

NecenzuriranoIndependentProgressiveFactual 75Objective 60

The article discusses the ongoing legal and financial struggles faced by former employees of Progros, a company owned by Slovenian politician Boris Mijič of the Resni.ca party. These workers have been left without wages and social contributions for over a year, with some having passed away before receiving any compensation. One such case involves Mark, who died of cancer after being laid off without proper benefits. The Delavska svetovalnica (Labour Advisory Office), which has been assisting these workers, claims that Progros owes them between €2,000 and €4,000 per employee, though exact figures remain unclear due to incomplete documentation. Zoran Stevanović, Mijič’s party leader, initially offered to pay the debts personally but limited this to three employees. The article highlights the workers' efforts to recover their money and hold the company accountable, while noting that Mijič has not publicly responded to the allegations.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the situation as a political issue by emphasizing the ownership of Progros by Boris Mijič, a member of the Resni.ca party, and highlights the failure of a political figure's affiliated company to meet its obligations to workers. It presents the workers’ plight as a result of bothM

Why these scores (Factual 75 · Objective 60): The article presents factual claims about Mijič's company owing money to former employees and legal issues but lacks specific details from the primary source document. The tone is biased towards criticizing Mijič and his party, using emotionally charged language like 'agonija' and 'korupcija'.

Zanima.meIndependentCenterFactual 75Objective 6016 days ago

The Slovenian political party Resni.ca has decided not to join the Development Partnership for Slovenia, which was offered by Prime Minister Janez Janša to opposition parties. The deadline for joining the partnership expired on June 26, and the party's president, Zoran Stevanović, stated that they do not see a particular purpose in signing the agreement. He explained that the party will remain loyal to their promises to voters, supporting proposals they believe are beneficial for Slovenia and opposing those that do not align with their program or national interest. While satisfied with the 'outstretched hand' of the coalition, they view the agreement as purely formal with no substantive content. Stevanović emphasized that the party does not need to justify their decision to other parties and acknowledged that opinions within Resni.ca regarding joining the partnership were divided.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the decision of Resni.ca not to join the development partnership in a balanced manner, quoting statements from both the party leadership and providing context about the political landscape. There is no evident bias toward either side, and the framing remains neutral.

Why these scores (Factual 75 · Objective 60): The article continues the pattern of political commentary without addressing the factual details from the primary source. It includes some relevant names but does not connect them to the broader context of Mijič’s financial and labor law violations. Objectivity is limited due to the focus on politic

24ur (POP TV)IndependentCenterFactual 75Objective 5511 days ago

The article discusses a situation involving Stevanović, who has decided to cover the unpaid wages of three former employees from his own savings after taking over a company previously managed by Boris Mijić. According to Stevanović, these workers were left without pay, and he views this action as an act of fairness rather than manipulation. He claims that the media and even his own PR team have criticized him for this decision but remains committed to his principles regardless of external pressures. Mijić is accused of withholding salaries, forging employee signatures on resignation forms, and failing to report payments to the Pension and Disability Insurance Fund (Zpiz) and the Financial Administration of the Republic of Slovenia (Furs). Stevanović also mentioned that Mijić is under investigation by the Anti-Corruption Commission (KPK), and if Mijić fails to meet obligations or is found guilty of any charges, he will lose his position as a representative.

Bias read (Center): The article presents both Stevanović's perspective and the allegations against Mijić without overtly favoring either side. It includes direct quotes from Stevanović and outlines the accusations made against Mijić, providing a balanced view of the situation without clear ideological framing or biased

Why these scores (Factual 75 · Objective 55): The article reports on Stevanović's actions regarding employees of Progros, citing his statements. However, it includes opinions and lacks detailed verification of claims made by Stevanović.

ReporterIndependentConservativeFactual 75Objective 5019 days ago

The article discusses the political dynamics in Slovenia, focusing on Prime Minister Janez Janša and his interactions with other officials. It highlights Janša's strategy of keeping a low profile while delegating high-profile tasks to others, such as sending 'camera men' like Zoran Stevanović into the spotlight. The piece critiques the current government's policies, particularly regarding education and economic challenges, and references concerns over the impact of previous government decisions on the economy. It also mentions the potential influence of international institutions and the comparison between Janša's leadership style and that of former Prime Minister Robert Golob.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames Janša's actions in a manner that suggests he is strategically avoiding direct confrontation while delegating visibility to others, which aligns with a conservative or right-leaning narrative. The critique of past government decisions and emphasis on economic caution also reflect a

Why these scores (Factual 75 · Objective 50): The article discusses political topics but lacks specific factual details about the cookie policy. It contains subjective commentary and opinions rather than objective reporting.

RTV Slovenija (MMC)State / PublicCenterFactual 65Objective 6011 days ago

Zoran Stevanović, predsednik Državnega zbora in vodja politične stranke Resni.ca, je sprejel tri delavce podjetja Progros, ki so ostali brez plač, in ponovil svojo obljubo, da jim bo manjkajoče prejemke izplačal iz lastnih prihrankov. Podjetje Progros, ki ga vodi poslanec Resni.ca Boris Mijič, naj bi delavcem odtegovalo plače in ponarejalo njihove podpise pod odpovedmi, s katerimi jih je odjavilo iz evidenc Zavoda za pokojninsko in invalidsko zavarovanje. Delavci so se obrnili na Delavsko svetovalnico, kjer jih podjetje dolguje plačo in regres. Stevanović je poudaril, da ne bo izpustil mandata Mijiča zaradi pritiskov, vendar bo odločitev o njegovi nadaljnji politični aktivnosti odvisna od rezultatov preiskav pristojnih organov.

Bias read (Center): The article presents both Stevanović's actions and his claims regarding Mijič's alleged misconduct. It includes direct quotes from Stevanović and references to ongoing investigations by relevant authorities, providing a balanced view without overtly favoring either side.

Why these scores (Factual 65 · Objective 60): The article discusses financial issues at Progros but doesn't connect them to cookie policies. It presents information about legal actions against Mijič but lacks specific technical details from the primary source document. The tone appears biased toward the accused.

Siol.netState / PublicCenterFactual 60Objective 5016 days ago

The leader of the Resni.ca party, Zoran Stevanović, announced that his party would not sign the Partnership Agreement for a Successful Slovenia, which was proposed by Prime Minister Janez Janša to parliamentary parties and members of national minorities after the formation of the government. Stevanović stated that the agreement lacks substantive content and is purely formal, and therefore they would not enter into any agreement with the coalition. The agreement would require the coalition to submit laws for approval at least ten days before their consideration by the government. Several opposition groups, including the Left, Vesna, and Movement Freedom, have rejected the partnership due to doubts about its sincerity, particularly regarding some actions taken by the coalition at the start of their mandate. Additionally, Stevanović criticized Janša's plans to move Slovenia's embassy to Jerusalem and freeze recognition of Palestine, calling them contrary to international law.

Bias read (Center): The article presents both the decision of the Resni.ca party not to sign the agreement and the reasons provided by Stevanović, while also mentioning the opposition's skepticism towards the agreement and Stevanović's criticism of Janša's foreign policy proposals. There is no clear ideological framing

Why these scores (Factual 60 · Objective 50): The article is more about political strategy and party positions rather than the core issue of Boris Mijič’s actions. It lacks detailed facts from the primary source and appears biased towards certain political viewpoints.

NecenzuriranoIndependentProgressiveFactual 55Objective 35

The article discusses the situation involving MP Boris Mijič of the Resni.ca party, who faces allegations of unpaid wages, tax evasion, and forged documents. Despite these accusations, Mijič has not publicly commented on them. Instead, his party leader, Zoran Stevanović, has taken responsibility for addressing the issue. Stevanović emphasized that Mijič has until the end of the year to resolve his debts and stated that Resni.ca will retain its five parliamentary mandates regardless. Initially, Stevanović avoided commenting on the allegations but later expressed trust in Mijič and claimed he wanted to resolve the issues quickly. The article highlights how Stevanović shifted focus away from Mijič's problems by attacking journalists and politicians who called for Mijič's resignation.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the situation as an attempt by Stevanović to protect Mijič using misleading claims and shifting blame onto others, which suggests a critical stance towards the actions of the Resni.ca leadership. This framing aligns with a left-leaning perspective, emphasizing accountability and批评

Why these scores (Factual 55 · Objective 35): The article makes allegations against Zoran Stevanović and Boris Mijič but lacks concrete evidence from the cookie policy. It has a strong subjective tone and appears to favor one side of the argument.