US President Donald Trump has once again threatened to attack Iran's power plants and bridges unless Tehran returns to negotiations. During a Fox News interview, Trump warned that 'next week it gets really bad' for Iran, emphasizing that the US would continue escalating pressure unless a deal is reached. Experts have weighed in on the legality of such strikes, with retired Brigadier General Mark Kimmitt stating that bridges and infrastructure supporting military operations are legitimate targets. However, legal scholar Craig Jones highlighted the need to assess whether such actions provide a concrete military advantage and whether the harm to civilians and the environment is proportionate. Human rights organizations like Amnesty International and the United Nations have raised concerns that targeting energy infrastructure could result in significant civilian casualties and potentially constitute war crimes.
Bias read (Center): The article presents multiple perspectives from experts, including military personnel, legal scholars, and human rights organizations, offering balanced views on the legality of potential US strikes against Iran. It does not favor one side over another but rather outlines the arguments for and the担忧
