Wie Israel den iranischen Ex-Präsidenten Ahmadinejad angeworben hat

Israeli intelligence services reportedly sought to recruit former Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad during a covert operation aimed at destabilizing the Islamic Republic’s leadership, according to reports compiled from multiple sources. The effort, which allegedly spanned several years, was part of broader U.S.-Israel strategies to weaken Iran's political structure and potentially install a more pliable leader in power. The operation reached its peak during the early spring offensive launched by U.S. and Israeli forces against key figures within Iran’s regime, including the residences of both former Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and Ahmadinejad. The operation began with a coordinated attack on Ahmadinejad’s residence, which initially led to widespread speculation about his death. However, official statements from Iranian authorities later confirmed that he had survived the strike. According to the New York Times, the attack was not intended to kill him but rather to facilitate his removal from public view and eventual relocation to a secret location under Israeli control. The goal was to position Ahmadinejad as a potential replacement for Khamenei should the latter fall from power, leveraging his past influence and political connections. The plan, however, did not unfold as intended. After being secretly relocated, Ahmadinejad reportedly grew disillusioned with the operation and abandoned the hidden location, returning instead to the custody of the Revolutionary Guards. His reappearance came unexpectedly during the funeral ceremonies for Khamenei, marking his return to public life after months of enforced disappearance. This move underscored the shifting dynamics within Iran’s leadership, particularly following Khamenei’s death. Central to the recruitment efforts was the role played by the Ludovika University in Budapest, which hosted a climate change conference in 2024. According to the New York Times, this event served as a strategic platform for Israeli intelligence operatives to engage with Ahmadinejad. The university, under the guise of hosting academic discussions, became a venue for clandestine meetings between Ahmadinejad and Israeli agents. These interactions were believed to have taken place over multiple years, with Ahmadinejad meeting Israeli officials during trips to Guatemala and repeated visits to Budapest. Israeli intelligence reportedly provided financial support for these meetings, covering travel expenses and accommodation costs. The extent of this involvement remains unclear, though it suggests a level of coordination between Israeli agencies and external actors seeking to influence Iran’s internal politics. During his tenure as president from 2005 to 2013, Ahmadinejad was known for his hardline stance toward Western powers, including Israel, and for advancing Iran’s nuclear program. He also faced international criticism for his handling of post-election protests in 2009. Despite his initial alignment with conservative factions, Ahmadinejad gradually shifted towards more moderate positions, distancing himself from Khamenei’s policies. This evolution made him a target for opposition groups within Iran, who saw him as a potential alternative to the current leadership. His growing popularity among certain segments of the population further complicated his relationship with the ruling elite, leading to restrictions on his movement and public appearances. Following Khamenei’s death, Ahmadinejad resurfaced publicly, signaling a possible realignment of power structures within Iran. While the full implications of his recent appearance remain uncertain, it highlights the ongoing tensions and power struggles within the country’s political landscape. As the situation continues to evolve, the long-term consequences of such covert operations will likely shape the trajectory of Iran’s future governance.