Dr. Miha Juhart, a legal expert specializing in civil and economic law from Ljubljana’s Faculty of Law, has called the maneuver by Roko Snežič and Borisa Mijič a “complete nonsense.” The situation involves a dispute over the management and ownership of the company Progros, which was recently renamed Klukec, a business focused on camel breeding. According to reports, Snežič, who previously worked under the Ministry of Labour, allegedly took over the company free of charge from parliamentarian Borisa Mijič, with plans to transfer control to another figure within days. This move has sparked controversy among legal experts and stakeholders. The incident unfolded after Snežič revealed earlier this week that he had taken over Progros without payment from Mijič, who is reportedly owed 2,489 euros for legal costs. Snežič claimed he would remain the sole owner temporarily before passing control to Luka Mesec, a representative of the Left Party, who holds authority over his assets. However, according to Juhart, such a transfer does not constitute a valid enforcement action. He explained that enforcement requires selling the debtor's assets, not merely transferring them. If Mesec were to initiate enforcement, the shares held by Snežič would need to be sold, allowing Mesec to recover his debt. In response to questions about the implications for the company, Juhart stated that the director must assess the financial condition of the firm based on available information. Given the current state of affairs, it is likely that the director will recommend initiating insolvency proceedings. The owner, Snežič, would then be required to provide additional capital, otherwise the company could face liquidation. Insolvency procedures can be initiated either by the director or by creditors, including unpaid workers, suppliers, and the state. The situation has drawn attention due to the involvement of several parties, including the former director of Progros, who is also a member of parliament. Mijič, who previously served as a parliamentarian, has been accused of misrepresenting his educational background. His son, Miladin Mijič, was replaced by Admir Kamerić, who resides in the village of Dubnica in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Kamerić, who assumed the role of permanent resident, has since become the new director of the company. Legal experts warn that if the company fails to meet its obligations, the consequences could extend beyond mere financial loss. Delinquencies include unpaid wages to employees exceeding 10,000 euros, uncollected taxes and contributions to the Financial Administration of Slovenia (Furs) totaling more than 30,000 euros, and outstanding debts to cooperative partners. These issues have raised concerns about potential legal actions against Mijič, including possible criminal charges. Juhart emphasized that the recent transfer of Progros to Klukec represents a provocative act, not uncommon in Slovenian history. He described the scenario as a serious conflict involving individuals who have not been paid for their work, suggesting that some are exploiting the situation for personal gain. He referred to the case as a tragedy, highlighting the broader implications for affected parties. As the situation develops, the outcome will depend largely on whether the company’s director takes appropriate steps to address the financial crisis. Without intervention, the possibility of insolvency remains high, potentially leading to the dissolution of the enterprise and further legal repercussions for all involved.
1 Berichte
DnevnikUnabhängig🔒ProgressivFaktentreue 55Objektivität 30vor 10 Std. Dr. Miha Juhart über die Snowman-Snowman-Manöver: "Das ist vollkommener Unsinn!"In dem Artikel wird ein Rechtsstreit zwischen dem Geschäftsmann Rok Snežič und seinen Versuchen, das Eigentum an seiner Firma Progros an eine andere Partei zu übertragen, diskutiert. Der Rechtsanwalt Miha Juhart kritisiert Snežičs Manöver und bezeichnet es als "völlig töricht". Laut Juhart beinhaltet das richtige Verfahren für die Inkasso den Verkauf von Vermögenswerten anstatt die Übertragung des Eigentums. Snežič behauptet, er habe Progros von dem Abgeordneten Boris Mijič kostenlos übernommen und plant, es an einen anderen Abgeordneten, Luka Mesec, zu übertragen, der eine Forderung gegen ihn für Rechtskosten hat. Juhart argumentiert jedoch, dass dieser Ansatz die rechtlichen Anforderungen für die Durchsetzung nicht erfüllt. Die Situation hebt potenzielle rechtliche Fehltritte und finanzielle Risiken für das Unternehmen hervor, die zu Konkursverfahren führen könnten, wenn das aktuelle Management die finanziellen Probleme nicht angeht.
Tendenz-Einschätzung (Progressiv): In dem Artikel wird das rechtliche Manövrieren von Rok Snežič und seinen Mitarbeitern in einer Weise dargestellt, die darauf hindeutet, dass ihre Handlungen politisch motiviert oder unangemessen sind.
Warum Faktentreue (55): The article reports on a legal dispute involving Rok Snežič and his alleged transfer of ownership of Progros to Klukec, a company focused on camel breeding. It includes statements from lawyer Miha Juhart who criticizes the maneuver as 'complete nonsense.' The article references a debt owed by Snežič
Warum Objektivität (30): The article presents a strongly critical view of Rok Snežič's actions, using emotionally charged language such as 'popolna neumnost' ('complete nonsense'). It frames the situation as a 'tragedija te zgodbe' ('tragedy of this story') and emphasizes the legal implications without presenting alternativ
★
Halte die Nachrichten ehrlich.
ObjectiveNews ist leserfinanziert und werbefrei – wir zeigen dir den Bias, statt ihn zu verstecken. Unterstütze unabhängigen Journalismus für 5 €/Monat.
Unterstützer werden