Žiga Turk: Čas nastavljanja drugega lica je končan

ReporterNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 75Objektivnost 65včeraj

Članek poroča o polemiki, v kateri je sodeloval Državni sekretar Jaklin, ki je bil obtožen prejemanja podkupnin. V odgovoru na nedavne medijske poročila, ki trdijo, da je proti njemu potekala preiskava korupcije, Jaklin zanika kakršne koli nepravilnosti in navaja, da nikoli ni sprejel nezakonitih koristi ali zlorabil svojega javnega položaja za osebno korist.

Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja Jaklinovo obrambo in kritiko medijskih praks, vendar ne favorizira ene politične strani nad drugo.

Zakaj te ocene (Dejstva 75 · Objektivnost 65): Factuality is moderate as the article reports on statements from Jaklin and his party, but lacks direct evidence or official documents to verify claims. Objectivity is somewhat compromised by the emotional tone and the strong defense of Jaklin, which may reflect partisan bias.

Nova24TVStrankarsko povezanLevoDejstva 75Objektivnost 60pred 22 urami

Publicist and professor Žiga Turk has returned to writing columns on the Siol.net portal after a break. Upon his return, he posted a provocative message on X linking his comeback to political changes at the top of the state. In his column titled 'Vročina prihaja' ('Heat is Coming'), Turk critically evaluates the state of Slovenian media and expresses satisfaction with the potential broader reach of readers on Siol. He describes a system where access to media is politically controlled, with left-wing media serving left-wing politics and right-wing media serving right-wing politics. Turk also criticizes extreme climate activism, arguing that industrialization and technological progress have significantly increased life expectancy while dismissing apocalyptic rhetoric as exaggerated. He suggests that the true solution lies in adaptation and reasonable technological solutions. Turk predicts a 'hot' mandate for the new government and more freedom of expression in the media.

Ocena pristranskosti (Levo): The article frames the return of Žiga Turk to media commentary as a response to political shifts, suggesting a left-leaning perspective by criticizing the current media landscape as being influenced by political control. The author emphasizes the need for media independence and critiques the left's

Zakaj te ocene (Dejstva 75 · Objektivnost 60): Factuality is moderate as the article reports on Turk's return to Siol.net and his commentary on media plurality, aligning with cross-source consensus. Objectivity is lower due to strong ideological framing and emotive language, particularly in criticizing left-wing media control and praising right-

DemokracijaStrankarsko povezanLevoDejstva 60Objektivnost 30pred 9 dnevi

The article discusses a recent incident on a Slovenian motorway where the public was not informed about the true nature of the event. Media outlets reported it as an 'extraordinary event' and a 'evening drama', but failed to clarify whether it involved a bridge collapse, floods, bears entering the highway, or other causes. The author suggests that the media has been instructed by authorities to withhold information, possibly due to a pact between police and mainstream media. It also criticizes the reluctance of editors to report fully, noting that some are replaced when they refuse to comply. The piece accuses non-governmental actors like Niko Kovač of exerting influence over media decisions, particularly regarding sensitive topics such as suicide or migration. The author argues that this lack of transparency undermines democratic accountability.

Ocena pristranskosti (Levo): The article frames the issue as a deliberate suppression of information by authorities and media, aligning with left-wing critiques of state control and media manipulation. It highlights the role of external actors like Niko Kovač in influencing media narratives, suggesting a systemic bias toward un

Zakaj te ocene (Dejstva 60 · Objektivnost 30): The article contains unsubstantiated claims about media censorship and self-harm incidents without citing sources. The factual basis is weak, and the tone is highly biased against certain political groups.

DomovinaNeodvisenLevopred 3 urami

V članku se razpravlja o življenju in karieri Mirja Peteka, upokojenega slovenskega novinarja in publicista, ki so ga februarja 2001 v njegovem domu v Mežici hudo napadli neznani napadalci. Trpel je več zlomov in razpadli čeljust, vendar je preživel zaradi zdravniškega posredovanja. Napad se je zgodil po tem, ko je razkril korupcijo, povezano z vplivnimi levičarskimi političnimi krogi v regiji. Kljub obsežni preiskavi nobeni storilec ni bil nikoli odgovoren. Petek se je od takrat vrnil v novinarstvo in zdaj razpravlja o tem incidentu v intervjuju na TVS1. V intervjuju kritizira sedanjo stanje slovenskih medijev, sodstva in politike ter poudarja neskladja med retoriko in prakso.

Ocena pristranskosti (Levo): V članku je napad na Miroja Petka označen kot del širšega vzorca političnega vmešavanja in institucionalnega neuspeha, zlasti pa ga povezuje z "levičnimi političnimi krogi" in kritizira "upravitev Golob" zaradi hinavščine.

VečerNeodvisen🔒Levopred 6 dnevi

V članku je opisan izmišljeni scenarij, v katerem se Zoran Stevanović, politik, po napornem tednu počasi spočiva na plaži, sprosti z branjem detektivskih zgodb in se zabava z gosti.

Ocena pristranskosti (Levo): V članku je Zoran Stevanović označen kot oseba, ki kritizira medijski narod in navaja, da je pristranski in da ni vreden biti del medijske pokrajine.