Yemen's Southern Transitional Council (STC) has accused the newly installed Saudi Arabia-aligned National Shield Forces of failing to curb rampant Houthi smuggling activities, which it claims have created conditions for a potential naval blockade of the Red Sea. This development follows the STC's withdrawal from southern Yemen earlier this year after a pro-Saudi military operation forced them out of key positions. The STC alleges that the shift in control has allowed Houthi-aligned networks to expand smuggling routes from the Horn of Africa into northern Yemen, thereby strengthening the Iran-backed group's position. Since January, the National Shield Forces have taken charge of security and counter-terrorism operations in southern Yemen, displacing STC units that had previously managed these duties. According to Amr Al Bidh, a former STC spokesman, the transition left a security vacuum that has enabled Houthi smuggling to flourish. Smuggling routes from the Horn of Africa to Houthi-controlled areas in northern Yemen have expanded significantly, he said, contributing to the group's growing influence and capability. Al Bidh criticized Saudi Arabia's intervention in southern Yemen, calling it a strategic error that has inadvertently strengthened the Houthis and other extremist groups. He argued that the STC's removal from power eliminated a crucial deterrent against Houthi aggression and disrupted the balance of power in the region. The STC continues to assert that the current government forces are ineffective in addressing Yemen's security challenges, despite their formal alignment with the internationally recognized government based in Aden. In addition to the Houthi threat, concerns have emerged regarding the increasing visibility of Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) in the central Hadhramaut province, particularly in the city of Mukalla. AQAP's movements have become more pronounced, according to Al Bidh, alongside the activities of the Somali Islamist group Al Shabab, which is reportedly involved in smuggling operations that support Houthi networks. These developments suggest a complex interplay of local and regional actors in the ongoing conflict. The National Shield Forces, tasked with maintaining security in southern Yemen, are still in the process of establishing a cohesive command structure. Recruitment efforts have focused primarily on tribal loyalists to the Saudi-backed administration. The first division defending against Houthi advances is led by Ali Al Shami and Rashid Alwan, while Anan Zariq al Qamishi heads the second division in Hadhramaut. Despite leadership changes, reports indicate that the overall situation remains stagnant, with little progress in curbing smuggling or improving security. Meanwhile, the Houthi group has declared a naval blockade against Saudi Arabia, a move that has drawn sharp condemnation from Riyadh. Saudi Arabia dismissed the Houthi announcement as disinformation and warned of potential escalation in the Red Sea. A closure of the Bab Al Mandeb strait, a vital maritime chokepoint, could severely impact Saudi oil exports to Asia and disrupt regional trade. The Saudi-led coalition emphasized that any claims of a blockade were unfounded and urged the Houthis to engage in dialogue rather than resorting to threats. The United Nations has also expressed concern over the potential for further regional instability, urging all parties to resolve disputes through diplomatic means. Analysts warn that any actual implementation of the Houthi blockade could have far-reaching consequences, given the strategic importance of the Red Sea for global trade. As tensions continue to mount, the effectiveness of the National Shield Forces in securing southern Yemen will remain under close scrutiny, with implications for both regional stability and the broader conflict dynamics in Yemen.
6 poročil
The NationalStrankarsko povezanProgresivnoDejstva 85Objektivnost 70pred 17 dneviČlanek poroča o poslabšanju odnosov med Savdsko Arabijo in jemenskimi uporniki Huti, ki so vključeni v krhko premirje, ki je zdaj ogroženo. Nedavni vojaški ukrepi, vključno z raketnim napadom Hutijev na mednarodno letališče Abha v Savdski Arabiji in odvetnimi zračnimi napadi, ki so ciljali let delegacije Hutijev, poudarjajo poglabljanje napetosti.
Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): V članku je konflikt označen kot boj proti domnevnemu vmešavanju Savdske Arabije in poudarjene geopolitične razsežnosti, ki vključujejo Iran in ZDA.
Zakaj dejstva (85): The article accurately reports the recent military exchange between Saudi Arabia and the Houthis, citing specific events such as the airstrike on Sanaa International Airport and the Houthi attack on Abha International Airport. It references the geopolitical tensions and the role of Iran, aligning wi
Zakaj objektivnost (70): The tone leans toward portraying the Houthis as aggressors and Saudi Arabia as the aggrieved party, with some emotionally charged language like 'testing a red line.' While the facts are presented neutrally, the narrative subtly frames the conflict in a way that may favor Saudi interests.
The NationalStrankarsko povezanProgresivnoDejstva 80Objektivnost 65pred 10 dnevi Jemenski STC pravi, da je porast tihotapljenja Hutijev temelj za blokado Rdečega morjaČlanek obravnava situacijo v južnem Jemnu po prevzemu varnostnih operacij s strani Južnega prehodnega sveta (STC) s strani Nacionalnega ščita, ki je usklajen s Savdsko Arabijo.
Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): V članku je saudska intervencija označena kot "strateška napaka", ki je Houthijem in drugim terorističnim skupinam dala moč, pri čemer se uporablja jezik, ki nakazuje odgovornost za trenutno dinamiko konflikta.
Zakaj dejstva (80): The article provides specific claims from Amr Al Bidh of the Southern Transitional Council regarding the failure of National Shield Forces to address Houthi smuggling. It references the timeline of events and the involvement of AQAP and Al Shabab. However, it lacks independent corroboration of these
Zakaj objektivnost (65): The article presents the perspective of the Southern Transitional Council and criticizes Saudi intervention. It uses phrases like 'strategic mistake' and 'empowered the Houthis,' which may indicate a bias against Saudi policy.
Gulf NewsStrankarsko povezan🔒SredinaDejstva 75Objektivnost 65pred 15 dneviČlanek poroča o obnovljenih napetostih v jemenskem spopadu, saj hutijski uporniki grozijo, da bodo blokirali ožino Bab Al-Mandab, kritični pomorski prehod skozi Rdeče morje. Ta razvoj je vzbudil zaskrbljenost zaradi morebitnih motenj v globalnih dobavah nafte, saj je preliv glavna pot za pošiljke nafte z Bližnjega vzhoda v Evropo in Azijo.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja situacijo kot geopolitično vprašanje, ne da bi očitno naklonil nobeni strani, osredotočen pa je na posledice grožnje Houthijev, ne da bi sprejel jasen stališč o samem konfliktu, ohranja pa uravnotežen pristop s poudarkom na regionalnih in mednarodnih tveganjih.
Zakaj dejstva (75): The article reports on the Houthis threatening a Bab Al-Mandab blockade, which aligns with cross-source consensus that the Yemen war has escalated. However, the phrasing 'twin oil chokepoints?' suggests a speculative framing rather than confirmed facts. No primary source is available to verify the s
Zakaj objektivnost (65): The article uses emotionally charged language such as 'reignites' and implies a significant escalation without providing balanced perspectives from all parties involved. The focus on the Houthis' actions may reflect a bias toward certain narratives.
Gulf NewsStrankarsko povezan🔒SredinaDejstva 75Objektivnost 65pred 15 dnevi Vojna v Jemnu se ponovno zažiga, saj hutiji grozijo z blokado Baba Al-MandabaČlanek poroča o obnovljenih napetostih v jemenskem spopadu, saj hutijski uporniki grozijo, da bodo blokirali ožino Bab Al-Mandab, kritični pomorski prehod skozi Rdeče morje.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja situacijo kot geopolitično vprašanje, ne da bi očitno naklonil nobeni strani, osredotočen pa je na posledice grožnje Houthijev, ne da bi sprejel jasen stališč o samem konfliktu, ohranja pa uravnotežen pristop s poudarkom na regionalnih in mednarodnih tveganjih.
Zakaj dejstva (75): This is a duplicate of Article 0, so the factuality score remains similar. It repeats the claim about the Houthis threatening a Bab Al-Mandab blockade without new information or verification.
Zakaj objektivnost (65): As a duplicate of Article 0, it shares the same issues regarding emotional language and lack of balance. It does not add new perspective or challenge the narrative presented.
The NationalStrankarsko povezanSredinaDejstva 70Objektivnost 75pred 11 dnevi Saudijska Arabija zavrača grožnjo "morskega embarga" Hutijev in opozarja na eskalacijo na Rdečem morjuSaudijska Arabija je zavrnila objavo skupine Houthi o "morski embargo", ki jo je označila za lažno in obtožila gibanje, ki ga podpira Iran, širjenja dezinformacij. Houthiji so embargo razglasili 21. julija 2026, vendar niso navedli, kako ali kje bo izvajan. Savdski organi so poudarili svoje dolgoletne prizadevanja za pomoč Jemnu prek humanitarne pomoči, razvojnih projektov in dobave goriva, hkrati pa so kritizirali Houthije za blokiranje pobud, kot so jordanske predlagane lete v Sanaa.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku so predstavljeni stališča Savdske Arabije in skupine Houthi, ne da bi se očitno zavzemali za katero koli stran.
Zakaj dejstva (70): Article repeats content from earlier reports on Houthi smuggling and its implications for the Red Sea. While it provides some context, it lacks new information and does not offer independent verification of the claims made.
Zakaj objektivnost (75): The article maintains a neutral tone, discussing the impact of smuggling on the region without taking sides. However, it emphasizes the role of Saudi intervention, which could be interpreted as subtle bias.
The NationalStrankarsko povezanProgresivnoDejstva 60Objektivnost 65pred 10 dnevi Jemenski STC pravi, da je porast tihotapljenja Hutijev temelj za blokado Rdečega morjaČlanek poroča, da Južni prehodni svet (STC), skupina, ki zastopa južni Jemen, trdi, da Saudsko-arabskim nacionalnim ščitom ni uspelo preprečiti tihotapcev Houthijev, kar bi lahko privedlo do blokade Rdečega morja. Nekdanji tiskovni predstavnik STC Amr Al Bidh obtožuje saudsko posredovanje, da je opolnomočilo Iranom podprte Houthije, ki zdaj nadzorujejo severni Jemen in so uvedli pomorsko blokado proti Savdski Arabiji.
Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): V članku je izražena vojaška prisotnost Savdske Arabije v Jemnu kot "strateška napaka", ki je Houthijem dala moč, z uporabo močnega jezika, kot so "moč" in "teroristične skupine".
Zakaj dejstva (60): Article is a brief summary of multiple unrelated events, including tanker turns, Trump's Lebanon policy, and chickenpox in Gaza. It lacks depth and fails to provide sufficient context or verification for most claims.
Zakaj objektivnost (65): The tone is generally neutral, but the inclusion of diverse and often unrelated topics can lead to a lack of focus. The article may appear less objective due to its broad and superficial coverage.
★
Ohranimo novice poštene.
ObjectiveNews financirajo bralci in je brez oglasov – pristranskost vam pokažemo, ne skrijemo. Podprite neodvisno novinarstvo za 5 €/mesec.
Postani podpornik
AE
