Worshippers in West Bank tear-gassed as Israeli attacks on mosques surge

Al Jazeera EnglishDržavni / javniProgresivnoDejstva 85Objektivnost 752. 9. 2026

Izraelske sile in naseljenci so vse bolj napadali mošeje na zasedenih Zahodnem bregu, pri čemer so bili nedavni incidenti, ki so vključevali streljanje solznega plina v mošejo med molitvijo in poskusi zažiganja druge mošeje.

Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): V članku so izraelska dejanja označena kot "kršitev" in "kriminalni napadi" z uporabo močnega obsodnega jezika.

Zakaj dejstva (85): The article provides specific details such as the number of mosques violated (13) and includes verified footage and quotes from local residents and officials. It cites the Palestinian Ministry of Religious Affairs as a source, adding credibility. The information aligns with multiple reports from the

Zakaj objektivnost (75): While the article presents a clear account of the events, it frames the situation primarily from the Palestinian perspective, emphasizing the violation of religious sites. Although not overtly partisan, the focus on Palestinian grievances without equal attention to Israeli perspectives slightly affe

Al-Ahram OnlineDržavni / javniProgresivnoDejstva 75Objektivnost 6030. 8. 2026

V članku je poudarjen poročan porast števila palestinskih otrok in najstnikov, ki so jih izraelske sile ubile na okupiranem Zahodnem bregu.

Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): Članek uporablja močan, čustveno napolnjen jezik, kot je "umor palestinskih otrok in najstnikov", kar pomeni kritiko izraelskih dejanj.

Zakaj dejstva (75): The article reports an increase in Israeli killings of Palestinian children and teens in the West Bank, but lacks specific data or sources to support the claim of a 'surge.' It aligns with broader narratives from Palestinian media outlets, but without independent verification or primary source docum

Zakaj objektivnost (60): The language used is emotionally charged, particularly with terms like 'killing' and 'war on Gaza,' which may reflect a biased perspective. The focus on Palestinian casualties without equivalent coverage of Israeli actions suggests a one-sided narrative, affecting objectivity.

Middle East EyeNeodvisenProgresivnoDejstva 65Objektivnost 7029. 8. 2026

29. avgusta 2026 so izraelske sile izvedle napad na begunski kamp al-Amari v al-Birehju, zaradi česar sta bila poškodovana dva Palestincev, eden 15-letni otrok je bil ustreljen v hrbet, drugi pa je imel poškodbo na nogi.

Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): V članku so predstavljeni dogodki, ki vključujejo izraelske vojaške akcije proti Palestincem na okupiranem Zahodnem bregu, s poudarkom na poškodovanjih civilistov in omejitvah dostopa do palestinskih vasi.

Zakaj dejstva (65): The article reports conflicting information, citing both Wafa and the Palestinian Red Crescent Society for the injuries, but does not clarify if these sources are reliable or corroborated by other outlets. It also mentions Israeli actions without providing independent verification, and includes soci

Zakaj objektivnost (70): The article presents events without overt bias, though it frames Israeli actions as 'occupation forces' and mentions settler activity without indicating political stance. The tone remains neutral, though the inclusion of social media content may influence perceived reliability.