The European Union condemned recent threats against the International Criminal Court (ICC) as “unacceptable” on Tuesday, responding to a sweeping campaign by the United States aimed at dismantling the global judicial body. EU spokesperson Anouar El Anouni emphasized the bloc’s commitment to international criminal justice and warned that attacks or threats against ICC officials, personnel, or collaborators are not tolerable. The remarks came shortly after U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio launched a coordinated effort to weaken the ICC, framing it as a threat to American sovereignty and the rule of law. In a video posted on X and a detailed op-ed in the Wall Street Journal, Rubio accused the ICC of conducting a “war” against the United States and claimed it threatens the integrity of American institutions. He argued that the court, which he described as a “narrow backstop” for prosecuting only the most severe crimes when domestic systems fail, now operates beyond its intended scope. According to the State Department, the campaign will systematically disable the ICC’s operations, target American personnel, and challenge U.S. sovereignty. The agency noted that the ICC claims authority to prosecute and even imprison U.S. service members and officials acting in the national interest, a claim the U.S. asserts is unfounded, as the country has not ratified the Rome Statute, the treaty establishing the court. The U.S. strategy includes imposing stricter visa restrictions on ICC staff, increasing sanctions against the court and affiliated entities, and pressuring nations to withdraw from the ICC or cease financial support. The State Department also urged countries collaborating with U.S. law enforcement and military to reject the ICC’s jurisdiction over American personnel. This represents a significant escalation from previous efforts, which focused largely on sanctioning individual ICC officials deemed hostile to U.S. interests. Now, the campaign aims to dismantle the institution itself through a combination of diplomatic, economic, and legal pressures. Legal experts have criticized the move as an attempt to shield U.S. officials from accountability for potential war crimes abroad. Kenneth Roth, former executive director of Human Rights Watch, accused the Trump administration of seeking impunity for American actions overseas under the guise of protecting national sovereignty. He pointed out that the ICC only exercises jurisdiction over crimes committed in states that have ratified the Rome Statute, and that the U.S. has never investigated crimes occurring within its borders. Roth argued that Rubio’s rhetoric disguises a desire to avoid consequences for U.S. involvement in conflicts, particularly in regions like Afghanistan, where the ICC once investigated allegations of war crimes. Meanwhile, Croatian professor Iva Vukušić highlighted the growing risks to the ICC’s independence, noting that the current campaign could severely limit the court’s ability to function. She warned that sanctions against ICC officials have already restricted their travel, banking, and access to services, creating an environment of fear. Vukušić emphasized that the ICC’s work is increasingly vulnerable, especially as nations like Ukraine face potential pressure to sever ties with the court to secure continued U.S. aid. She criticized the U.S. approach as an extreme interpretation of sovereignty, arguing that it reflects a broader pattern of disregard for international law and cooperation. Vukušić also pointed out inconsistencies in how Western powers, including France and the UK, treat the ICC. While these nations advocate for the court’s role in holding Russia accountable for actions in Ukraine, they appear reluctant to fully support the ICC in situations where their own interests might be challenged. She called for greater transparency and action from EU members, including Croatia, to protect the court’s legitimacy. “We must act, not just speak,” she stressed, urging collective efforts to safeguard international justice. The escalating tensions between the U.S. and the ICC reflect deeper ideological divides over the role of international institutions in addressing global conflicts. While the ICC seeks to hold perpetrators of mass atrocities accountable, critics argue that its jurisdiction is too narrow and that powerful states often evade scrutiny. As the U.S. intensifies its campaign, the future of the ICC, and the principles of international law it embodies, will depend on how effectively the global community resists attempts to undermine its authority. For now, the battle continues, with the ICC facing unprecedented challenges from the very nation that once supported its creation.
8 poročil
EuronewsNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 95Objektivnost 80pred 3 dneviEvropska unija je obsojala nedavne grožnje proti Mednarodnemu kazenskemu sodišču (ICC), ki jih je označila za nesprejemljive. To sledi izjavi ameriškega državnega sekretarja Marco Rubija o kampanji, katere cilj je razgradnja ICC, in navaja zaskrbljenost zaradi morebitnega vpliva na suverenost ZDA. ZDA trdijo, da ICC ogroža ameriške pravne in politične sisteme z uveljavljanjem sodne pristojnosti nad ameriškimi državljani in uradniki.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja tako obsodbo EU groženj zoper ICC kot tudi kampanjo ZDA za njegovo razgradnjo, pri čemer se navedejo navedki obeh strani, ne da bi se očitno zavzemala za eno perspektivo.
Zakaj dejstva (95): The article accurately reflects the content of the primary source document, including the U.S. campaign against the ICC, Secretary of State Marco Rubio's statements, and the specific actions being considered. It quotes directly from the State Department's statement and provides context about the ICC
Zakaj objektivnost (80): While the article is largely factual, it leans slightly toward the U.S. perspective by emphasizing the threats posed by the ICC and quoting Rubio's strong rhetoric. It does not provide counterpoints or alternative viewpoints.
N1 HrvatskaNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 90Objektivnost 75predvčerajšnjimProfesorka Iva Vukušić, zgodovinarka na Univerzi v Utrechtu, je med živo oddajo na N1 razpravljala o intenzivni kampanji ameriškega predsednika Donalda Trumpa proti Mednarodnemu kazenskem sodišču (ICC). Poudarila je Trumpovo administracijo, ki obtožuje ICC za vojno proti Washingtonu in grožnjo Američanom. Vukušić je opozorila, da se Trump od prvega mandata upira ICC zaradi preiskav domnevnih vojnih zločinov ameriške vojske v Afganistanu, vendar je sedanja kampanja močnejša. Opozorila je, da grožnje s sankcijami proti sodnikom in osebju ICC, skupaj s potencialnim ciljanjem organizacij, ki zbirajo dokaze o vojnih zločinih v Palestini, predstavljajo pomembno stopnjevanje. Vukušić je poudarila, da bi to lahko močno vplivalo na operacije ICC, in navedla primere, kot je odvisnost od storitev Microsoft in ameriških bank.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja analizo mednarodnih pravnih institucij in geopolitičnih napetosti, ne da bi očitno zagovarjal katero koli stran.
Zakaj dejstva (90): The article accurately summarizes the U.S. campaign against the ICC, citing Professor Iva Vukušić's analysis of the situation. It mentions the potential impact of sanctions on ICC officials and the broader implications for institutions like the ICC. However, it lacks direct quotes from the primary s
Zakaj objektivnost (75): The article presents a critical view of the U.S. campaign, highlighting concerns about the escalation of tensions and the potential consequences for the ICC. While it remains mostly objective, it shows some bias in favor of the ICC and against the U.S. approach.
SRF NewsDržavni / javniSredinaDejstva 90Objektivnost 70pred 6 dnevi6. julija 2026 so ameriške oblasti zahtevale varnostna jamstva od Irana v zvezi z odprtjem Ormuškega preliva za pomorski promet. To se je zgodilo v času stalnih napetosti na Bližnjem vzhodu, kjer je konflikt vplival na globalne ladijske poti in gospodarsko stabilnost. ZDA so uvedle sankcije iranskim finančnim omrežjem, medtem ko je bivši predsednik Trump razglasil premirje in se strinjal s pogajanji. Medtem Evropska unija razmišlja o sankcijah, povezanih z izraelsko politiko naselbin, v Gazi pa so bile žrtve civilistov zaradi izraelskih napadov. Poleg tega so skrivnostni zračni napadi na Iran sledili ameriški ofenzivi, situacija pa je vplivala na prizadevanja Evropske centralne banke za boj proti inflaciji.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek poroča o geopolitičnih dogodkih, ki vključujejo Združene države, Iran in Izrael, in predstavlja več dejanj in reakcij različnih akterjev, ne da bi očitno naklonjeni kateri koli strani.
Zakaj te ocene (Dejstva 90 · Objektivnost 70): Provides factual details about U.S. airstrikes and Iran's responses, though some phrasing suggests a pro-U.S. stance with terms like 'ungerechtfertigte Angriffe'.
Le FigaroNeodvisen🔒KonservativnoDejstva 90Objektivnost 55pred 10 dnevi7. julija 2026 so Združene države ponovno uvedle gospodarske sankcije za izvoz iranske nafte, pri čemer so navedle "popolnoma nesprejemljiva" dejanja Irana v Ormuškem prelivu, kjer je bilo v zadnjih dneh napadenih več ladij. Napadi naj bi bili namenjeni ladjam, ki pripadajo Savdski Arabiji in Katarju, obe državi pa sta obtožili Iran kljub sporazumu o prekinitvi ognja, podpisanemu med Teheranom in Washingtonom 17. junija.
Ocena pristranskosti (Konservativno): Članek označuje dejanja Irana kot "popolnoma nesprejemljiva" in poudarja ponovno uvedbo sankcij s strani ZDA, z uporabo močnega jezika, ki se ujema z zahodnimi geopolitičnimi stališči.
Zakaj te ocene (Dejstva 90 · Objektivnost 55): The article accurately details the US strikes and Trump's comments. However, it includes emotive language and lacks a balanced perspective on the broader implications of the conflict.
N1 HrvatskaNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 85Objektivnost 90pred 7 dnevi ZN: Države morajo zavrniti Iranske napore za nadzor nad HormuzomMednarodna pomorska organizacija Združenih narodov (IMO), ki ima sedež v Londonu, je pozvala države, naj zavrnejo poskuse Irana, da bi uveljavil suverenost nad Hormuško ožino in enostransko nadzoroval pomorski promet skozi strateško vodno pot. IMO, ki jo sestavlja 176 držav članic, je poudaril, da odločitev Irana o ustanovitvi organa za urejanje prehoda skozi ožino krši mednarodne norme. Organizacija je pozvala države članice, naj ne priznajo iranskih zahtevkov za suverenost nad ožino ali njeno oblastjo nad morskimi območji okoli nje.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja stališča IMO in Irana, ne da bi očitno naklonil nobeni strani. V njem so navedki obeh subjektov in opisane njihove argumente, ne da bi uporabil pristranski jezik ali selektivno opustil informacije.
Zakaj dejstva (85): This article discusses a different topic entirely — Iran's attempt to assert control over the Strait of Hormuz — rather than the U.S. campaign against the ICC. Therefore, it is not relevant to the primary source document, which focuses on the U.S. government's efforts to dismantle the ICC. However,
Zakaj objektivnost (90): The article presents information objectively, without apparent bias or emotional language. It reports on the UN's stance regarding Iran's actions without taking sides.
Deutsche Welle (English)Državni / javniKonservativnopred 5 uramiZdružene države so okrepile svoje nasprotovanje Mednarodnemu kazenskemu sodišču (ICC), pri čemer grozijo z ukrepi, kot so vizumske omejitve za osebje ICC in sankcije proti sodišču in povezanim subjektom. Ta poteza sledi nedavnim komentarjem ameriškega državnega sekretarja Marco Rubija, ki je prisegel, da bo ICC razstavljal "opeko za opeko". ZDA niso članice ICC, njeni ukrepi pa imajo za cilj pritiskati na druge narode, da se oddaljijo od sodišča. Pravni strokovnjaki ugotavljajo, da to predstavlja strateško in razširjeno kampanjo proti ICC, ki vključuje tudi države, ki niso članice. ICC, ustanovljen leta 2002, preganja posameznike za vojne zločine, zločine proti človeštvu in genocid, in je izdal nalog za aretacijo voditeljev, kot sta Vladimir Putin in Benjamin Netanyahu.
Ocena pristranskosti (Konservativno): V članku so dejanja ZDA označena kot usmerjena kampanja proti ICC, poudarjajo pa agresivno retoriko visokih uradnikov, kot je Marco Rubio, in poudarjajo morebitne posledice za osebje ICC in povezane organizacije.
Hindustan TimesNeodvisenKonservativnopred 18 uramiPredlog zakona, ki ga je podprlo 60 ameriških senatorjev, je namenjen uvedbi carin do 100% na Indijo in štiri druge države za nakup ruske nafte. Zakon, znan kot zakon o sankcioniranju Rusije iz leta 2026, bi Trumpovi administraciji podelili pooblastila za uporabo teh carin na pet največjih kupcev ruske nafte ali zemeljskega plina. Ciljne države vključujejo Kitajsko, Indijo, Slovaško, Madžarsko in Azerbajdžan.
Ocena pristranskosti (Konservativno): V članku je predlagana zakonodaja predstavljena kot dvostranska prizadevanja s podporo Trumpove administracije in republikanskega senatorja Johna Thunea, s poudarkom na kaznovalnih ukrepih proti posameznim državam.
Hindustan TimesNeodvisenSredinavčeraj Ameriški senatorji v novem zakonu zahtevajo 100-odstotne carine za nakup ruske nafte.Ameriški senatorji so predlagali predlog zakona, ki poziva do 100-odstotnih carin za države, ki kupujejo rusko nafto, s ciljem na velike kupce, kot so Kitajska, Indija, Slovaška, Madžarska in Azerbajdžan. To je revidirana različica Zakona o sankcioniranju Rusije, ki ga je prvotno uvedel aprila 2025 senator Lindsey Graham, ki je kasneje umrl. Zakon ima za cilj pritiskati na države, ki so odvisne od ruske energije, z uvedbo gospodarskih kazni.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku sta tako ameriški predlog kot stališče Indije predstavljena nevtralno, ne da bi se očitno zavzemala za katero koli stran.
★
Ohranimo novice poštene.
ObjectiveNews financirajo bralci in je brez oglasov – pristranskost vam pokažemo, ne skrijemo. Podprite neodvisno novinarstvo za 5 €/mesec.
Postani podpornik
