(VIDEO) Silovit potres na Japonskem terjal 30 življenj: V nakupovalnem centru je odjeknila še eksplozija
Močan potres je 30. julija 2026 prizadel jugozahodno Japonsko, povzročil znatne škode in povzročil najmanj 30 smrtnih žrtev. Potres je povzročil strukturni propad v lokalnem nakupovalnem središču, v katerem je bilo ujetih več ljudi. Približno eno uro kasneje je močna eksplozija še dodatno poslabšala situacijo, kar je otežilo reševalne napore in povečalo paniko med prebivalci. Reševalne ekipe so takoj začele iskati preživele pod ruševinami, vendar je eksplozija otežila njihovo delo.
A powerful earthquake struck southern Japan on Tuesday, July 28, 2026, causing widespread damage and resulting in at least 30 deaths. The quake, which registered a magnitude of 6.8 on the Richter scale, hit the region near Kumamoto on the island of Kyushu, with its epicenter approximately 10 kilometers beneath the surface. The tremors were followed by multiple aftershocks, including one that triggered an explosion at a shopping mall in the area, further complicating rescue efforts. The disaster led to severe structural damage, particularly at the Aeon Mall in Kumamoto, where parts of the building collapsed, trapping numerous shoppers inside. Rescue teams immediately began searching for survivors under the rubble, though the situation was made more difficult by the subsequent explosion, which added to the panic among residents and hindered operations on-site. According to reports, several individuals were still missing after the incident, and the number of casualties could rise in the coming days as search teams continue their work. In addition to the human toll, the earthquake caused extensive disruptions to infrastructure. Roads were closed, public transportation services were disrupted, and power outages affected over 45,000 households. Local authorities activated emergency response protocols, deploying around 3,600 members of the Self-Defense Forces alongside police and firefighters to assist in recovery efforts. The Japanese government has also issued warnings about the potential for additional quakes and tsunamis in the coming days, emphasizing the need for continued vigilance. Amid the chaos, a unique and heartening effort emerged. In one of the damaged buildings within the shopping complex, a popular cat café played a role in rescuing both pets and employees who had been trapped. This act of compassion brought a sense of hope to the community during a time of great distress. Meanwhile, local officials urged residents to remain calm and avoid entering damaged structures due to the risk of further collapses, especially given the possibility of stronger earthquakes. The impact of the disaster extended beyond immediate physical injuries. Many hospitals reported receiving patients with burns and fractures, some of whom required urgent medical attention. The lack of electricity and water posed additional challenges, forcing healthcare facilities to manage limited resources while ensuring patient care. Some elderly individuals reportedly suffered heat-related illnesses due to high temperatures, prompting concerns about the health risks faced by vulnerable populations. The earthquake also sparked renewed discussions about Japan’s preparedness for such disasters. Despite the severity of the event, experts noted that strict building codes and early warning systems helped mitigate the overall death toll. However, the incident highlighted ongoing vulnerabilities, particularly in areas where infrastructure was already strained by previous disasters, such as the 2016 Kumamoto earthquake that claimed over 270 lives. International media coverage of the event included video footage capturing the moment the explosion occurred at the Aeon Mall, as well as interviews with survivors describing the intensity of the shaking. One survivor, a 75-year-old restaurant owner named Hiroko Ogata, recounted how she had instinctively taken cover under a table during the quake, only to find it moving violently back and forth as if caught in a storm. Others described feeling as though their homes might collapse, underscoring the profound fear experienced by many. As the search for missing persons continues, the focus remains on stabilizing the affected regions and restoring essential services. With the threat of further seismic activity lingering, authorities have advised residents to stay informed and follow official guidance. The long-term implications of this disaster will likely include increased investment in disaster resilience and improved coordination between emergency services and local communities.
Kako je poročala vsaka stran
Isti dogodek, razvrščen po političnem nagibu medijev, ki so o njem poročali.
progresivno
sredina
konservativno
★
Kako je poročala vsaka stran
Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in svoj prilagojen pregled Zame.
V Avstriji so potresi občutili v delih Spodnje Avstrije in Štajerije, prebivalci Dunaja pa so poročali o šibkejših potresih. Na cesti med Schottwienom in Breitensteinom je prišlo do manjših poškodb, na cesti pa je padlo več majhnih kamnov, vendar ni bilo poročil o poškodovancih ali pomembnih poškodbah.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja dejanske informacije o potresu brez očitnega ideološkega okvirja.
Zakaj dejstva (95): The article accurately reports the 4.5 magnitude earthquake in Austria, including precise timing (1.59), location (Semmering), depth (4km), and impact in Slovenia (intensity III EMS-98). It also correctly notes minor damage in Austria and no injuries in Slovenia.
Zakaj objektivnost (95): The article presents the information objectively, using clear and neutral language without any signs of bias or subjective interpretation.
Potres z magnitudo 4,5 je bil zabeležen blizu Semmeringa v Avstriji, glede na seizmološke podatke iz državne mreže postaj za spremljanje potresov.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja dejanske informacije o potresu, ne da bi sprejel politično stališče.
Zakaj dejstva (95): The article accurately reports the 4.5 magnitude earthquake in Austria, including precise timing (1.59), location (Semmering), and impact in Slovenia (intensity III EMS-98). It aligns perfectly with other sources regarding the event details.
Zakaj objektivnost (95): The article maintains a completely neutral tone, presenting only factual information without any personal opinion or biased language.
24. julija 2026, ob 13.59 po lokalnem času, je bil blizu Semmeringa v Avstriji zabeležen potres z magnitudo 4,5. Seizmografi iz slovenske nacionalne mreže za spremljanje potresov so zaznali potres. Nekateri prebivalci v severovzhodni Sloveniji so občutili tresenje, vendar po podatkih Agencije za okolje slovenskega seizmološkega urada intenzivnost v Sloveniji ni presegla stopnje III na evropski ravni.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja dejanske informacije o potresu, ne da bi sprejel politično stališče. Poroča o znanstvenih meritev in uradnih ocenah brez komentarjev ali poudarka na ideoloških stališčih.
Zakaj dejstva (95): The article accurately reports the 4.5 magnitude earthquake in Austria, including precise timing (1.59), location (Semmering), and impact in Slovenia (intensity III EMS-98). It aligns perfectly with other sources regarding the event details.
Zakaj objektivnost (95): The article maintains a completely neutral tone, presenting only factual information without any personal opinion or biased language.
Potres z magnitudo 4,5 je bil zabeležen v bližini Semmeringa v Avstriji ob 1:59 po lokalnem času 24. julija 2026, glede na podatke seizmične mreže. Potrese so občutili nekateri prebivalci v severovzhodni Sloveniji, čeprav so intenzivnost ocenili pod stopnjo III na evropski lestvici.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek poroča o naravnem dogodku z minimalnim političnim okvirjem. Medtem ko omenja slovenski Seismološki urad, ni očitnega ideološkega nagibanja ali poudarka na stranskih pogledih.
Zakaj dejstva (90): The article accurately reports a 4.5 magnitude earthquake in Austria near Semmering, noting the time (1.59), depth (4km), and impact in Slovenia (intensity III EMS-98). It matches other sources precisely and includes relevant details about minor damage in Austria.
Zakaj objektivnost (90): The article remains objective throughout, presenting facts without editorializing or biased language, and accurately represents the event as described by other sources.
Srednji potres z magnitudo 4,5 je prizadel območje okoli Semmeringa v Avstriji. Epicenter je bil na globini štirih kilometrov. Seizmografi so potresi zabeležili ob 1:59 zjutraj. Prebivalci v severni Sloveniji so občutili tresenje, čeprav intenzivnost ni presegla III na lestvici EMS-98. Po poročilih so se v nekaterih območjih pojavile manjše škode zaradi padca kamnov, zaradi česar so gasilci reagirali na cesti med Schottwien in Breitenstein.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek vsebuje dejanske informacije o potresu, vključno z njegovo velikostjo, lokacijo, globino in učinki.
Zakaj dejstva (90): The article accurately reports a 4.5 magnitude earthquake near Semmering, Austria, at 1:59 AM. It includes relevant details such as the depth of the quake, the response by firefighters, and the reported intensity in Slovenia. These facts align closely with the cross-source consensus.
Zakaj objektivnost (90): The article maintains a neutral and informative tone throughout, presenting the facts without bias or emotional language. It provides clear and concise reporting on the event, including the response and effects.
24. julija 2026, ob 1:59 zjutraj po lokalnem času, je bil v bližini Semmeringa v Avstriji zabeležen potres magnitude 4,5, po seizmoloških omrežjih. Potres se je zgodil na globini 10 kilometrov in ga so občutili nekateri prebivalci v severozahodni Sloveniji, kot je poročala Agencija za okolje (Arso).
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja dejanske informacije o naravni nesreči brez očitnega ideološkega okvirja.
Zakaj dejstva (90): The article accurately reports the 4.5 magnitude earthquake in Austria, including precise timing (1.59), location (Semmering), and impact in Slovenia (intensity III EMS-98). However, it adds some social media content that may not be directly relevant to the main factual reporting.
Zakaj objektivnost (90): The article remains mostly objective, though it incorporates some social media content that might introduce slight subjectivity.
Slovenske noviceNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 90Objektivnost 90pred 8 dnevi
Po podatkih državne seizmične mreže potresnih observatorijev je bil ob 1:59 zjutraj blizu Semmeringa v Avstriji zabeležen potres magnitude 4,5.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja dejanske informacije o potresu brez očitnega ideološkega okvirja.
Zakaj dejstva (90): The article accurately describes a 4.5 magnitude earthquake near Semmering, Austria, occurring at 1:59 AM. It confirms that some residents in northwestern Slovenia felt the quake and provides the estimated intensity according to the EMS scale. These details match the cross-source consensus.
Zakaj objektivnost (90): The article remains objective and factual, presenting the event without any subjective interpretation or biased language. It clearly outlines the event and its effects based on available data.
V bližini avstrijskega Semmeringa je ponoči zabeležen potres z magnitudo 4,5, ki so ga čutili tudi prebivalci severovzhodne Slovenije, kot so Maribor, Kungota in Pesnica. Seizmografi državne mreže potresnih opazovalnic so zabeležili potres ob 1.59. Na Arsu ocenjujejo, da intenziteta potresa v Sloveniji ni predegla III EMS-98. Prebivalci, ki so potresni, lahko izpolnijo vprašalnik na spletnem portalu.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja nepristransko poročilo o potresu, brez političnih nagnjenja ali kritike. Informacije so objektivno prikazane s podrobnostmi o lokalizaciji, magnitudi v učinkih potresu, brez dodatnih komentarjev ali političnih implikacij.
Zakaj dejstva (90): The article accurately reports a 4.5 magnitude earthquake near Semmering, Austria, at 1:59 AM. It mentions that some residents in northern Slovenia felt the quake and provides the estimated intensity according to the EMS scale. These details are consistent with the cross-source consensus.
Zakaj objektivnost (90): The article is presented in a neutral and factual manner, avoiding any emotional or biased language. It focuses on delivering the essential information about the event without personal opinion or spin.
Zmerni potres z magnitudo 3,6 na Richterjevi lestvici je v četrtek ob 6:29 zjutraj prizadel kraj Sisak na Hrvaškem. Potres je bil najmočnejši na območju okoli Sisaka in okolice, nekateri prebivalci so poročali o občutkih, kot so glasni zvoki in tresenje.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku so navedeni dejanski podatki o potresu, vključno s podrobnostmi o njegovi velikosti, lokaciji in učinkih.
Zakaj dejstva (85): The article accurately describes a 3.6 magnitude earthquake near Sisak, Croatia, with details matching other sources like article 8. It mentions the depth (9km), intensity (EMS IV), and lack of reported damage, aligning with cross-source consensus.
Zakaj objektivnost (85): The article presents facts neutrally, using direct quotes from residents and citing official seismic data without apparent bias or emotional language.
V četrtek zjutraj, 30. julija 2026, okoli 6:30 lokalnega časa je v bližini Siske prizadel zmerno močan potres z magnitudo 3.6. Potres so občutili na območjih okoli Siske, vključno z deli Zagreba in deli Bosne in Hercegovine.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja dejansko poročilo o naravnem dogodku brez očitnega ideološkega okvirja.
Zakaj dejstva (85): The article accurately describes a 3.6 magnitude earthquake near Sisak, Croatia, with details matching other sources like article 0. It mentions the depth (9km), intensity (EMS IV), and lack of reported damage, aligning with cross-source consensus.
Zakaj objektivnost (85): The article presents facts neutrally, using direct quotes from residents and citing official seismic data without apparent bias or emotional language.
Potres z magnitudo 6,8 je v četrtek prizadel južno Japonsko, pri čemer je umrlo vsaj 13 ljudi in jih stotine poškodovalo. Več kot 10.000 gospodinjstev je izgubilo elektriko in vodo, več kot 9.000 ljudi pa je iskalo zatočišče v evakuacijskih centrih. Potres, ki je dosegel največji japonski skale 7 na skale Shindo, je poškodoval dele prefekture Kumamoto na otoku Kyushu. Reševalne ekipe iščejo pogrešane osebe na delno uničenih območjih, kot sta nakupovalni center Aeon in papirnica. V kompleksu Aeon so umrle vsaj dve ženski, poročali pa so o eksplozijah in uhajanju plina.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku so predstavljene dejanske informacije o vplivu potresa in vladnem odzivu brez očitnega ideološkega nagibanja.
Zakaj dejstva (85): The article states 13 deaths, aligns with most sources, and provides details about the magnitude (6.8), location (Kumamoto), and rescue efforts. It mentions the explosion but does not confirm its connection to the earthquake. The information is consistent with other reports.
Zakaj objektivnost (85): The article remains neutral throughout, presenting facts from official sources and avoiding subjective commentary. It balances the human impact with logistical details without taking sides.
Močan potres je 30. julija 2026 prizadel jugozahodno Japonsko, povzročil znatne škode in povzročil najmanj 30 smrtnih žrtev. Potres je povzročil strukturni propad v lokalnem nakupovalnem središču, v katerem je bilo ujetih več ljudi. Približno eno uro kasneje je močna eksplozija še dodatno poslabšala situacijo, kar je otežilo reševalne napore in povečalo paniko med prebivalci. Reševalne ekipe so takoj začele iskati preživele pod ruševinami, vendar je eksplozija otežila njihovo delo.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek poroča o naravni nesreči in njenih neposrednih posledicah, ne da bi sprejel politično stališče.
Zakaj dejstva (85): The article reports 30 deaths, mentions the collapse of a shopping mall, and an explosion afterward. However, other sources report lower death tolls (13-15), suggesting this may be an overstatement. It also accurately describes the location (Kumamoto) and the sequence of events.
Zakaj objektivnost (75): The article uses emotionally charged language like 'silovit potres' (powerful earthquake) and 'odjeknila še eksplozija' (also an explosion). It focuses on dramatic elements such as the collapse and the rescue of cats, which may introduce bias toward sensationalism.
Močan potres je prizadel jugozahodno Japonsko in povzročil znatne škode in žrtve. Potres, ki je meril 7,1 na Richterjevi lestvici, se je zgodil v globini deset kilometrov pod površjem in mu je sledil več naknadnih potresov.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku so navedeni dejanski podatki o potresu in njegovih posledicah, s poudarkom na številu žrtev, pričevanjih preživelih in reševalnih prizadevanjih.
Zakaj dejstva (80): The article cites Premier Sanae Takaichi reporting 13 deaths, aligning with most other sources. It provides details about the magnitude (6.8), location (Kumamoto), and includes eyewitness accounts. However, it does not clarify if the 13 figure is final or preliminary.
Zakaj objektivnost (85): The article maintains a neutral tone, quoting officials and including eyewitness statements without apparent bias. It avoids emotional language and presents facts objectively.
Slovenske noviceNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 70Objektivnost 80pred 4 dnevi
Na Islandiji je v ponedeljek zjutraj prizadel potres magnitude 5,4, ki je povzročil seizmične valove, ki so jih zaznali instrumenti v Sloveniji, vključno s šolskim observatorijem v Podbrdu. Čeprav ljudi v Sloveniji potresa niso občutili, lahko sodobni seizmografi zaznajo tudi šibke seizmične valove, ki potujejo skozi notranjost Zemlje. Islandija ostaja ena od geološko najbolj aktivnih regij zaradi svoje lokacije na meji med severnoameriško in evrazijsko tektonsko ploščo. Območje okoli polotoka Reykjanes je bilo tesno spremljano zaradi nedavnega povečanja seizmične aktivnosti in vulkanskih izbruhov.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku so navedeni dejanski podatki o potresnih dogodkih, ne da bi se zavzemali za politične entitete ali ideologije, temveč se osredotočajo na znanstvene razlage in geografske kontekste.
Zakaj dejstva (70): The article correctly identifies an earthquake in Iceland with magnitude 5.4 but incorrectly dates it as '28. 7. 2026' while other articles consistently report '24. 7. 2026'. It provides accurate technical details about seismic wave detection but has a minor dating error.
Zakaj objektivnost (80): The article maintains a neutral tone, explaining scientific concepts without bias or emotional language, though it slightly misdates the event.
V torek, 28. julija 2026, ob 12:21 so seizmološki senzorji v slovenskem nacionalnem omrežju zabeležili potres z magnitudo 1,7 blizu Radeča.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek poroča o znanstvenem dogodku - potresu - brez kakršnih koli političnih komentarjev, oblikovanja ali pristranskosti.
Zakaj dejstva (70): The article accurately reports a 1.7 magnitude earthquake near Radeč, Slovenia, at 12:21 PM. It includes relevant details such as the estimated intensity according to the EMS scale. While it is a smaller event than others mentioned, the information is consistent with the cross-source consensus.
Zakaj objektivnost (80): The article maintains a neutral and informative tone throughout, presenting the facts without bias or emotional language. It provides clear and concise reporting on the event, including the response and effects.
V južnem delu Japonske je v torek ob 16:27 po lokalnem času prizadel močan potres z epicentrom približno deset kilometrov pod površjem. Potres z magnitudo 6,8 je povzročil obsežne škode v prefekturi Kumamoto na otoku Kyushu, vključno z delnim propadom nakupovalnega centra Aeon Mall, kjer je bilo poročanih, da sta umrli dve ženski v svojih dvajsetih letih. Reševalne ekipe še naprej iščejo devet pogrešanih oseb, za katere se domneva, da sta ujeti v papirni tovarni v mestu Yatsushiro. Infrastruktura je bila močno prizadeta, z poškodovanimi avtocestami, prekinjenimi železniškimi storitvami in preklicom vseh letov na letališču Kumamoto. Več kot 46.000 gospodinjstev je doživelo prekinitve elektrike. Japonske oblasti so za pomoč pri reševalnih prizadevanjih napotile okoli 3.600 osebja. Visoke poletne temperature otežujejo reševalne operacije, bolnišnice pa se soočajo z izzivi, povezanimi s pomanjkanjem električne energije in hladilnimi sistemi.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek zagotavlja dejanske informacije o potresu, njegovem vplivu in tekočih reševalnih prizadevanjih brez očitnega ideološkega okvirja ali pristranskega jezika.
Zakaj dejstva (50): This article incorrectly states the date as '29. 07. 2026' when others clearly state '24. 07. 2026'. It also falsely reports a Japanese earthquake as occurring on '29. 07. 2026', which is unrelated to the actual event being discussed. The article contains significant factual inconsistencies compared
Zakaj objektivnost (60): While the article attempts to remain neutral, it introduces irrelevant information about Japan and appears to conflate different events, which affects its overall objectivity.
Slovenske noviceNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 50Objektivnost 60pred 4 dnevi
V bližini mesta Radeč v Sloveniji je bil v torek, 28. julija, ob 12:21 po lokalnem času zabeležen potres z magnitudo 1,7. Dogodek je zaznala nacionalna seizmična mreža, ki jo upravlja Agencija za okolje Republike Slovenije.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja dejanske informacije o dveh ločenih potresih, ne da bi sprejel politično stališče, in zagotavlja uravnoteženo poročanje o obeh dogodkih, s poudarkom na znanstvenih podatkih in javnem odzivu brez ideološkega okvirja.
Zakaj dejstva (50): This article incorrectly states the date as '28. julija' when others clearly state '24. julija'. It also falsely compares the Slovenian earthquake to a Japanese earthquake, which is unrelated. The article contains significant factual inconsistencies compared to the cross-source consensus.
Zakaj objektivnost (60): While the article attempts to remain neutral, it introduces irrelevant information about Japan and appears to conflate different events, which affects its overall objectivity.
V članku se razpravlja o seizmičnem tveganju v Sloveniji in poudarja, da je pomemben del države na območju, ki je zelo nagnjen k potresom. Poudarja potencialni gospodarski vpliv velikega potresa, podobnega tistemu, ki je prizadel Ljubljano leta 1895, in ocenjuje, da bi škode lahko dosegle 15% BDP na podlagi simulacij. V članku kritizira pomanjkanje pozornosti, ki se daje seizmičnim grožnjam v primerjavi z drugimi naravnimi nesrečami, kot so poplave, ki so jih pred kratkim doživeli številni prebivalci. Trdi, da je seizmično zavarovanje v bistvu davek, ki ne bi smel obstajati, kar kaže, da je sedanji pristop k obvladovanju tega tveganja nezadosten.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku so predstavljene informacije o seizmičnih tveganjih in njihovih gospodarskih posledicah, ne da bi se odkrito zavzemal za kakršen koli politični stališč.
Zakaj dejstva (40): The article discusses earthquake risk in Slovenia but does not provide specific details about a particular event. It references past events like floods and earthquakes from 2026 but lacks precise information such as date, location, or magnitude. The lack of concrete data makes it difficult to assess
Zakaj objektivnost (50): The tone is somewhat alarmist, emphasizing the potential dangers of earthquakes without providing balanced context or acknowledging the lack of recent seismic activity. The article uses emotive language like 'muhašta' (capricious) and 'sistemskih tveganj' (systemic risks) which may influence reader
Smerno močan potres z magnitudo 3,6 je v četrtek zjutraj okoli 6:30 zjutraj zadel blizu Siske v Hrvaški. Potres so občutili prebivalci v Zagrebu in delih Bosne in Hercegovine. Hrvaška seizmološka služba je zabeležila potres v bližini Siske, katerega intenzivnost je dosegla IV stopnjo na evropski makrozemski lestvici (EMS) in je bila osredotočena približno devet kilometrov globoko.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja dejanske informacije o naravnem dogodku, ne da bi sprejel politično stališče.
Zakaj dejstva (30): The article discusses an earthquake in Croatia but lacks specific details such as date, time, or magnitude. This absence of concrete information makes it difficult to verify against the cross-source consensus, particularly when compared to other articles describing different events.
Zakaj objektivnost (60): The article presents the event in a neutral tone, focusing on the impact in Croatia and surrounding areas. However, it lacks depth and fails to provide enough detail to confirm the event's specifics.
Japonsko je prizadel močan potres, zaradi česar so oblasti izdale opozorila o možnih naknadnih pretresih in cunamijih.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek poroča o naravni nesreči in uradnih opozorilih brez očitnega ideološkega okvirja, ne zavzema stališča o dogodku ali njegovih posledicah, osredotoča pa se izključno na dejanske informacije, ki so jih zagotovile oblasti.
Zakaj dejstva (20): This article appears to be unrelated to the main event discussed in other articles, mentioning a severe earthquake in Japan with warnings of further quakes and tsunamis. There is no connection to the Austrian or Slovenian earthquake described elsewhere, making it irrelevant to the cross-source conse
Zakaj objektivnost (50): The article has a sensational tone, using phrases like 'hud potres' (strong earthquake) and 'svarijo pred novim sunkom in cunamijem' (warned about new shocks and tsunamis), which can create unnecessary alarm.
★
Ohranimo novice poštene.
ObjectiveNews financirajo bralci in je brez oglasov – pristranskost vam pokažemo, ne skrijemo. Podprite neodvisno novinarstvo za 5 €/mesec.
Slovenia
