[Video] RTV nad socialna omrežja, ker jih politiki ne potrebujejo več

Nova24TVStrankarsko povezanProgresivnoDejstva 85Objektivnost 70pred 13 dnevi

V članku je razpravljeno o tem, kako tradicionalni mediji, kot je RTV Slovenija, izgubljajo vpliv, saj politiki vse bolj uporabljajo socialne medije za neposredno komunikacijo z javnostjo, obhajajoč novinarje in urednike.

Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): V članku so tradicionalni mediji označeni za zastarele in neučinkovite ter kritizirani zaradi izgube nadzora nad širjenjem informacij.

Zakaj dejstva (85): The article reports on RTV Slovenia's response to politicians using social media directly, citing examples like Zorán Stevanović, Anže Logar, and Jernej Vrtovč. It references specific quotes from these politicians and describes how RTV edited their statements. While no primary source is available, t

Zakaj objektivnost (70): The tone leans slightly towards criticizing politicians who bypass traditional media, suggesting they avoid difficult questions. While not overtly biased, the framing implies that RTV's role is being undermined by direct political communication, which introduces some editorial perspective.

PožareportNeodvisenProgresivnoDejstva 45Objektivnost 30pred 10 dnevi

V članku so obravnavane različne teme, povezane s slovensko politiko in mediji, vključno z obtožbami proti članom družine Golob glede njihove odsotnosti iz dela in morebitne zlorabe javnih sredstev.

Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): V članku se razpravlja o domnevni zlorabi javnih sredstev s strani pomembnih posameznikov in kritizira vladna dejanja, zlasti poziva k stavkam in odporu proti vladajoči stranki.

Zakaj dejstva (45): The article contains vague and unsubstantiated claims about family members taking time off, but no specific facts are presented or sourced. The references to individuals like Golob and Gabrova are not clearly supported by evidence, and the connection to 'Hanovo maslo' is unclear. There is little con

Zakaj objektivnost (30): The tone is highly biased and opinionated, using phrases like 'how stupid, really bright and repetitive these posts are.' It includes personal commentary and appears to take sides rather than presenting an objective account of events.