ON
← Nazaj na pregled
V Levici so se oglasili glede domnevnega kupovanja glasov srbske diaspore v Sloveniji
Slovenia🏛️ PolitikaProgresivnoSpregledano pri konservativnih

V Levici so se oglasili glede domnevnega kupovanja glasov srbske diaspore v Sloveniji

Slovenska politična stranka Levica je pozvala k neodvisnemu preverjanju obtožb o nakupu glasov med srbsko diasporo v Sloveniji med nedavnimi parlamentarnimi volitvami v Srbiji. Stranka je pozvala Beneško komisijo in Parlamentarno skupščino Sveta Evrope (PACE), naj natančno preučijo glasovalne postopke v tujini in poročajo o trditvah, da so bili glasovi kupljeni na srbskem veleposlaništvu v Ljubljani. Levica je navedel medijske poročila iz medijev, kot sta Delo in Serbian Times, ki navajajo, da so se srbski državljani v Sloveniji soočili s pomanjkanjem volilnih volilnih mest, zaradi česar so organizirali skupinski prevoz na edino razpoložljivo lokacijo na veleposlaništvu. Cilj pobude je zaščititi pravico do svobodne in tajne glasovanja z zagotavljanjem, da finančna podpora združenjem ne postane orodje politične prisile. Poleg tega je Levica zahteval, da se preveri, ali pravni okvir Srbije zagotavlja ustrezne zaščitne ukrepe proti nakupu glasov in ali diplomatska predstavništva ustrezno uporabljajo državne vire med volilnimi obdobji.

The Left party in Slovenia has called for independent verification of allegations regarding vote-buying among the Serbian diaspora during early parliamentary elections held in Serbia on October 25, 2026. The political group urged the Venice Commission and the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE) observation mission to pay special attention to voting procedures abroad and specific accusations of financial inducements targeting voters at the Serbian Embassy in Ljubljana. This appeal comes amid reports that Serbian citizens residing in Slovenia faced logistical hurdles, including long queues and limited polling station access, which some observers linked to potential irregularities favoring Prime Minister Aleksandar Vučić’s list. Serbian nationals living in Slovenia were required to cast their ballots exclusively at the Serbian Embassy located on Ciril-Metodov Square in central Ljubljana. Despite requests from local communities to open additional polling stations in Maribor and Koper, Serbian authorities did not establish these extra sites. Consequently, many voters organized their own transportation to the capital. Supporters of the student movement arranged free bus services from Maribor, Koper, and Celje to facilitate travel to the embassy. Media reports indicated that two buses departed from Maribor alone, though demand exceeded capacity, prompting further organized transport initiatives. Queues formed outside the embassy began in the early morning hours. By midday, lines stretched significantly through the city center, reaching as far as the Vodnikov hram restaurant near the Ljubljana market square. Some voters waited approximately two hours to cast their ballots. The embassy extended its operating hours due to high turnout, allowing all individuals present at the location until 8:00 PM to vote, even though standard polling hours ran from 7:00 AM to 8:00 PM. The atmosphere among waiting voters was described as positive, with some singing “Tri poljupca za sreću,” a song by Snežana Savić that serves as an unofficial anthem for the Student List opposition coalition. Approximately 3,300 to 3,878 Serbian citizens registered to vote in Slovenia, according to varying figures cited by media outlets. Among those waiting in line were several families who had relocated from Serbia over the past decade. Dragica and Maksim, parents of a two-year-old child, traveled from Koper, departing at 5:30 AM to arrive at the queue around 7:30 AM. They stated they moved from Šabac seeking better living conditions and expressed hope for a victory by younger generations in the election. Similarly, students Iva and Nina, both from Koper, cited lack of opportunities in Serbia as reasons for their move and voiced confidence in the Student List’s chances. An older couple, Snežana and Milan Milanović, who moved to Slovenia ten years ago for their son’s medical care, also participated, expressing a desire for political change and opportunities for youth. The Left party emphasized that votes should not become commodities subject to trade, nor should financial support for diaspora associations serve as tools for political coercion. The party stated that every Serbian citizen must have the right to vote freely and secretly in Slovenia, without pressure or fear of consequences stemming from their choice. The initiative aims to protect the right to free and secret ballot for all Serbian citizens, both domestically and abroad, regardless of political affiliation, while strengthening trust in electoral integrity. In its formal request, the Left party asked the Venice Commission and PACE to examine whether Serbia’s legal framework provides adequate safeguards against vote-buying and indirect influence on voters through the financing of foreign-based associations. The party requested an assessment of whether rules governing diplomatic and consular missions during elections are sufficiently clear to prevent the misuse of state resources or official positions for the benefit of specific political lists. Additionally, the party sought review of criteria used to determine overseas polling stations, questioning whether these standards are transparent, objective, and subject to effective legal protection. Media outlets, including Delo and the Serbian Times, previously reported allegations of vote-buying for Aleksandar Vučić’s list at the Ljubljana embassy prior to the election day. These reports highlighted complaints from Serbian citizens about the scarcity of polling stations, which led to the self-organized group transports mentioned earlier. While the Left party cites these media accounts as the basis for their call for investigation, the Serbian government has not publicly responded to these specific allegations within the provided texts. Voters in Serbia itself also faced long waits at domestic polling stations, with similar congestion reported in foreign locations such as Germany, France, and the United States. The early parliamentary elections determined whether the Serbian Progressive Party under Aleksandar Vučić would continue its rule or if voters would choose the changes promised by the Student List coalition. The outcome of the election remains pending final tallies, but the logistical challenges and subsequent calls for international scrutiny highlight ongoing tensions regarding electoral fairness for the diaspora. Local officials in Ljubljana noted the high volume of participants, with embassy staff managing the flow of voters into the building. A volunteer named Đorđe was observed assisting voters in organizing themselves into correct lines based on surname order inside the polling area. The extended presence of voters well beyond typical business hours underscored the determination of the diaspora community to participate in this pivotal national decision. As night fell, the last remaining voters continued to wait, ensuring that those who arrived before the cutoff time could exercise their franchise.

Kako je nastalo to poročilo. Objektivne novice je to poročilo napisal iz 3 izvornih člankov s pomočjo umetne inteligence po naši metodologiji. Gre za naše lastno besedilo, ne za kopijo posameznega medija. Preberite našo metodologijo.

Odgovorni urednik: Matej BašaSte opazili napako? Sporočite jo

3 poročil

STA – Slovenska tiskovna agencija logoSTA – Slovenska tiskovna agencijaDržavni / javniProgresivnoDejstva: uradni vir/dokument ni zaznanObjektivnost 95
Levica poziva k preverjanju očitkov o kupovanju glasov srbske diaspore v Sloveniji

Slovenska politična stranka Levica je pozvala k neodvisnemu preverjanju obtožb o nakupu glasov s strani srbske diaspore v Sloveniji med nedavnimi parlamentarnimi volitvami v Srbiji. Stranka je posebej pozvala beneško komisijo in opazovalno misijo Parlamentarne skupščine Sveta Evrope (PACE), naj posvečata posebno pozornost postopkom glasovanja, ki se izvajajo v tujini. Ta zahtevek poudarja zaskrbljenost zaradi morebitnih volilnih nepravilnosti, ki vključujejo državljane, ki prebivajo zunaj Srbije.

Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): Članek poroča izključno o izjavi "Levice", ki v slovenskem pomeni "levo" in je izrecno opredeljena kot levičarska politična stranka. Z osredotočanjem pripovedi na poziv tega konkretnega akterja za mednarodno preiskovanje domnevnega nakupa glasov, je članek sam po sebi

Zakaj dejstva: uradni vir/dokument ni zaznan

Zakaj objektivnost (95): Extremely neutral and concise. It simply states who did what without adding any adjectives, opinions, or framing devices. It is a pure factual report of a statement.

RTV Slovenija (MMC) logoRTV Slovenija (MMC)Državni / javniProgresivnoDejstva: uradni vir/dokument ni zaznanObjektivnost 85
Dolga vrsta za oddajo glasu tudi pred srbskim veleposlaništvom v Ljubljani

Srbski državljani, ki prebivajo v Sloveniji, so med predčasnimi parlamentarnimi volitvami glasovali na srbskem veleposlaništvu v Ljubljani, kar je povzročilo dolge vrste, kjer so nekateri volivci čakali do dveh ur. Zaradi pomanjkanja dodatnih volilnih točk v mestih, kot sta Maribor in Koper, so bili mnogi prisiljeni odpotovati v prestolnico, pri čemer so zagovorniki študentskega seznama organizirali brezplačen avtobusni prevoz iz različnih lokacij. V Sloveniji se je za glasovanje registriralo približno 3.300 posameznikov, podobna prizorišča visoke udeležbe pa so bila poročana po vsej Srbiji in v tujini. Slovenska politična stranka Levica je pozvala k neodvisnim preiskavam obtožb o nakupu glasov, namenjenih srbski diaspori v Sloveniji. Venecijansko komisijo in Parlamentarno skupščino Sveta Evrope so pozvali, naj preučijo, ali pravna zaščita ustrezno preprečuje finančno prisilo in zagotavlja svobodo glasovanja.

Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): V članku so se volitve prikazale skozi lečo domnevnih volilnih nepravilnosti, s poudarkom na posebnem pozivu slovenske levičarske stranke (Levica) k preiskavi obtožb o nakupu glasov. Poudarja ranljivost volivcev zaradi logističnih omejitev in navaja stališče Levica proti "neobvladovanju"

Zakaj dejstva: uradni vir/dokument ni zaznan

Zakaj objektivnost (85): The first half of the article describes the scene neutrally (long lines, wait times). The second half reports the Levica statement. The inclusion of the phrase 'whether... will continue the rule' is slightly interpretive but acceptable as describing the stakes of the election. Overall, it maintains

Slovenske novice logoSlovenske noviceNeodvisenProgresivnoDejstva: uradni vir/dokument ni zaznanObjektivnost 75
V Levici so se oglasili glede domnevnega kupovanja glasov srbske diaspore v Sloveniji

Slovenska politična stranka Levica je pozvala k neodvisnemu preverjanju obtožb o nakupu glasov med srbsko diasporo v Sloveniji med nedavnimi parlamentarnimi volitvami v Srbiji. Stranka je pozvala Beneško komisijo in Parlamentarno skupščino Sveta Evrope (PACE), naj natančno preučijo glasovalne postopke v tujini in poročajo o trditvah, da so bili glasovi kupljeni na srbskem veleposlaništvu v Ljubljani. Levica je navedel medijske poročila iz medijev, kot sta Delo in Serbian Times, ki navajajo, da so se srbski državljani v Sloveniji soočili s pomanjkanjem volilnih volilnih mest, zaradi česar so organizirali skupinski prevoz na edino razpoložljivo lokacijo na veleposlaništvu. Cilj pobude je zaščititi pravico do svobodne in tajne glasovanja z zagotavljanjem, da finančna podpora združenjem ne postane orodje politične prisile. Poleg tega je Levica zahteval, da se preveri, ali pravni okvir Srbije zagotavlja ustrezne zaščitne ukrepe proti nakupu glasov in ali diplomatska predstavništva ustrezno uporabljajo državne vire med volilnimi obdobji.

Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): V članku je predstavljen le pogled Levice, samo-opisana levičarska politična stranka, ki zadevo obravnava z vidika zaščite demokratičnih pravic in nasprotovanja zlorabi države. V poročilu so navedeni posebni medijski poročili, ki podpirajo domneve o nepravilnostih, vendar pa se v poročilu ne omenja nobenega nasprotnega dokaza.

Zakaj dejstva: uradni vir/dokument ni zaznan

Zakaj objektivnost (75): The tone is largely neutral, reporting the statements made by the political party 'Levica'. However, it includes direct quotes from the party that contain normative language ('rights must not become objects of trade', 'without pressure'), which introduces a slight degree of advocacy inherent to quot

Kako je poročala vsaka stran

Isti dogodek, razvrščen po političnem nagibu medijev, ki so o njem poročali.

Kako je poročala vsaka stran

Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in vse druge funkcije za podpornike.

Postani podpornik

Poročanje po svetu

Isti dogodek, kot so ga poročali v drugih državah.

Poročanje po svetu

Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in vse druge funkcije za podpornike.

Postani podpornik

Preverjanje trditev

Ključne dejanske trditve in koliko virov jih potrjuje oz. zavrača.

Preverjanje trditev

Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in vse druge funkcije za podpornike.

Postani podpornik

Ohranimo novice poštene.

ObjectiveNews financirajo bralci in je brez oglasov – pristranskost vam pokažemo, ne skrijemo. Podprite neodvisno novinarstvo za 4 €/mesec.

Postani podpornik

Povezane zgodbe