USKOK je sprožil preiskavo proti bivšemu vodji nabave MORH in Alme Bochu, ki iščeta preiskovalno zapornico.
Hrvaška obveščevalna agencija Uskok je sprožila preiskavo proti nekdanjemu vodji nabave na Ministrstvu za obrambo, brigadnemu Ivoju Devčiću in lastniku podjetja Design Vision, Almi Boch, ter zahtevala njihovo pridržanje do sojenja. V preiskavi se trdi zloraba položaja in avtoritete ter olajšanje nezakonitih postopkov nabave. Po obtožnici je Devčić med julijem 2018 in marcem 2019 kot vodja neodvisnega sektorja za javna naročila domnevno uredil, da je Design Vision zagotovil pogodbe z manipulirano nabavo. To je vključevalo razdelitev enega samega postopka nabave na dva ločena preprosta postopka nabave, vsak pod zakonskim pragom, da bi obšli zakone o javnih naročilih. Devčić je usmeril razpise za ponudbe izključno na izbrana trgovska podjetja, vključno z Design Vision.
Dario Šimić, former football star, arrested over alleged illegal camp permit in Tisno On July 14, 2026, former Croatian national football team player Dario Šimić was arrested during an anti-corruption operation conducted by the State Prosecutor’s Office for Combating Corruption and Organized Crime (USKOK) and the police. Šimić, along with former local official Neda Livljanić and businessman Marin Mikšić, was taken into custody under police supervision and brought to interrogation in Zagreb. The investigation centers around allegations of illegal issuance of permits for Šimić's camping facility in Tisno, a village near Šibenik, which is located outside the designated construction area. The case stems from a criminal complaint filed by the Public Prosecutor’s Office (PNUSKOK) and the Split Anti-Corruption and Organized Crime Service (SSKOK). According to USKOK, Šimić, through Mikšić, approached Livljanić, who was then head of the Department for Crafts and Tourism in the Šibenik-Knin County, requesting a permit for his camp. The permit would have allowed him to operate a catering service in his home, despite the property being located outside the construction zone and failing to meet the minimum technical requirements for such a category. USKOK alleges that all three individuals were aware that the land parcels in question were not suitable for building a camp and that there was no properly constructed site meeting the required standards. Despite this knowledge, Livljanić allegedly fabricated a report of inspection, falsely claiming she had visited the site with colleagues, and issued a decision granting the permit. The permit classified the site as a two-star camp, even though it did not comply with the law. Mikšić then received the decision from Livljanić and passed it to Šimić. The investigation found no grounds for detention, as per USKOK’s assessment, since there was no legal basis for such a measure. Šimić denied the charges during his interrogation, and his lawyer, Ivan Stanić, stated that Šimić does not consider himself guilty. “He is a sportsman who has learned to live often,” Stanić said. This is not the first time Šimić has been implicated in corruption-related matters. His brother, Josip Šimić, a former football player, was previously arrested in 2023 for involvement in fictitious trade and tax evasion. He later admitted guilt and reconciled with USKOK. However, this case is unrelated to the current one. Livljanić, meanwhile, has a history of similar allegations. She was already arrested in November 2023 in connection with issuing illegal permits for camps on Murter, a nearby island. At that time, she was among several businesspeople, including Zoran Pripuz, Dario Filipi, Eduard Maržić, and Boris Kulušić, who were accused of providing permits despite lacking proper documentation. An indictment against her was approved in July 2025, and her trial is ongoing. Mikšić, a prominent figure in local politics, has long been associated with Šimić. He served as deputy mayor of Vodice and later became its mayor after receiving support from HDZ council members. Currently, he is one of the vice-presidents of the Croatian Peasants’ Party (HSS) and president of the county organization of the party. Mikšić is also known for his role as president of NK Vodice, a local football club. He was briefly suspended from his duties in May 2026 after attacking a referee during a match. According to media reports, Mikšić and Šimić share a long-standing friendship. The prosecution suspects that Mikšić acted as an intermediary in obtaining the documents needed for Šimić’s camp. During the recent operation, Mikšić was detained alongside Šimić and Livljanić. The investigation into Šimić’s case reveals a pattern of repeated violations of spatial planning laws. The camp in Tisno, located on Murter, was built on land that was not designated for construction. It reportedly lacked proper infrastructure and failed to meet the basic conditions required for a two-star camp. Despite these deficiencies, the permit was issued, allowing Šimić to operate a catering service from his home. In response to the arrest, some locals expressed concern. Reporter Nikolina Radić of RTL noted that the disputed camp was located at the end of the mainland part of Tisno, within a green zone. She also mentioned that the state inspector confirmed that the authorities had processed a complaint in February 2025, leading to a decision to remove multiple structures from the area. Radić described the situation as involving four objects, which could be identified via satellite imagery. These structures were placed around an earlier-built object that Šimić had purchased and later renovated. That structure remained untouched because it had been legalized. Despite the controversy, some residents of Murter praised Livljanić for her willingness to help others. They claimed she had always assisted people, even offering services free of charge. Some individuals, who did not wish to speak publicly, stated that she had helped them without expecting anything in return, even refusing small gifts or gestures of appreciation. The Šibenik-Knin County governor, Paško Rakić, acknowledged the difficulty of the situation, noting that one of the detainees was a longtime employee of the county while another was an active member of the county assembly. He emphasized that the institution must remain neutral and let the process reveal the truth. The case highlights broader concerns about corruption and misuse of authority in local governance. It also underscores the challenges faced by officials tasked with enforcing regulations, particularly in areas where informal practices may prevail. As the investigation continues, the outcome will likely shape future policies and oversight mechanisms in the region.
Kako je poročala vsaka stran
Isti dogodek, razvrščen po političnem nagibu medijev, ki so o njem poročali.
progresivno
sredina
konservativno
★
Kako je poročala vsaka stran
Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in svoj prilagojen pregled Zame.
Članek poroča o preiskavi, ki jo je začelo hrvaško državno tožilstvo (USKOK) zoper tri osebe - nekdanjega nogometaša Dario Šimića, nekdanjega lokalnega uradnika Nedo Livljanića in poslovneža Marina Mikšića - zaradi domnevne zlorabe položaja in vpliva v zvezi z nezakonitim izdajanjem dovoljenj za dejavnosti gostinstva v okrožju Šibenik-Knin. Preiskava je bila sprožena na podlagi kazenskega poročila državnega tožilstva (PNUSKOK) in službe za boj proti korupciji in organiziranemu kriminalu (SSKOK) policijskega oddelka Split-Dalmatia.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja dejstva preiskave, ne da bi očitno naklonil nobeni politični strani.
Zakaj dejstva (90): This article provides detailed information about the investigation by USKOK, including the charges against Šimić, Livljanić, and Mikšić. It references the primary source document accurately and includes additional context about previous investigations and legal actions.
Zakaj objektivnost (85): The article maintains an objective tone, presenting the legal process and allegations without taking sides. The focus is on the procedural aspects rather than personal commentary.
Hrvaška agencija za boj proti organiziranemu kriminalu (USKOK) in javno tožilstvo v Splitu sta začela kazensko preiskavo, ki se osredotoča na izdajo dovoljenja za catering storitve v kampu Darija Šimića, ki se nahaja v njegovi zasebni rezidenci v Tisnu. V preiskavi so vključeni trije posamezniki: nekdanji nogometaš Dario Šimić, nekdanji lokalni uradnik Neda Livljanić in poslovnež/političar Marin Mikšić. Policaji so jih povabili na zaslišanje. USKOK sumi z zlorabo položaja in vpliva, ker je Livljanić lažno dokumentiral obisk na Šimićovi lastnini in izdal dovoljenje, ki omogoča vzpostavitev objekta za catering z dvema zvezdicama, kljub temu, da je zemljišče zunaj gradbenega območja in nima ustrezne infrastrukture. Mikimić naj bi med Šimićem in Šimićem olajšal komunikacijo.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja uravnotežen opis sodnega postopka, pri čemer navaja uradne vire, kot je USKOK, in se sklicuje tako na obtožbe zoper obtožene kot na njihovo obrambo.
Zakaj te ocene (Dejstva 90 · Objektivnost 80): Accurate representation of the primary source, including the names and roles of those involved. Maintains neutrality in reporting the allegations and the outcome of the investigation.
Nekdanji hrvaški nogometaš, Dario Šimić, je bil aretiran s strani Hrvaške obveščevalne službe (USKOK) in priveden na zaslišanje v Zagreb. Poleg njega so bili pridržani tudi nekdanji občinski uslužbenec Neda Livljanić in poslovnež iz Vodiče, Marin Mikšić. Preiskovalci sumijo, da je Šimić prek Livljanića dobil nezakonita dovoljenja za kamp v Tisnu.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja dejanske informacije o preiskavi, ki vključuje nekdanjega športnika, občinskega delavca in poslovnega moža, in se osredotoča na domnevno nezakonito izdajo dovoljenj.
Zakaj dejstva (88): The article provides detailed information about the arrests and the charges against Šimić, Livljanić, and Mikšić, aligning with the primary source. It includes background on Mikšić's political career and his role in the local government, which is consistent with the primary source.
Zakaj objektivnost (84): The article maintains an objective tone, providing both factual information and contextual background without showing bias towards any party involved.
Dario Šimić, znan kot nogometaš, in Neda Livljanić, bivša voditeljica Odjela za turizem, so bili aretirani pod obtožbo, da so nezakonito dobili dovoljenje za kamp v Tisnomu.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja situacijo kot pravno preiskavo, ki vključuje politične osebnosti, vendar ne favorizira nobene posebne politične strani.
Zakaj dejstva (88): This article closely follows the primary source, detailing the arrests and the alleged illegal issuance of permits. It includes information about Mikšić’s political background, which matches the primary source. It also references statements from HSS leader Darko Vuletić, adding context without embel
Zakaj objektivnost (82): The article maintains an objective tone, providing both the accusations and the response from HSS leadership. It doesn’t take a clear stance on the guilt or innocence of the accused, keeping the focus on reporting.
V poročilu je navedeno, da bo USKOK po zaslišanju osumljencev odločil o nadaljnjem postopku v zadevi in o tem obvestil javnost. Neformalni viri kažejo, da gre za novo fazo in širitev protikorupcijske preiskave, ki se osredotoča na Jeleno Peroso, nekdanjo županko Bujama, ki je bila zaradi domnevnih temnih poslov z nepremičninami nepo uradno označena kot "kraljica urbanizacije".
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Čeprav članek obravnava politično občutljivo vprašanje - korupcijo v lokalni uprave - predstavlja informacije, ki temeljijo na uradnih virih (USKOK, tožilstvo) in se izogibajo očitnemu ideološkemu oblikovanju.
Zakaj dejstva (88): The article covers the new anti-corruption operation by USKOK, mentioning the arrests and the charges against the individuals involved. It aligns with the primary source document regarding the illegal permits and the roles of the suspects. Some details about the broader corruption case are included,
Zakaj objektivnost (82): The tone is generally neutral, though there is some emphasis on the scale of the corruption case, which could be seen as slightly biased towards highlighting the seriousness of the situation.
Nekdanji hrvaški nogometaš Dario Šimić je bil aretiran s strani Agencije za boj proti korupciji (USKOK) in policije v Zagrebu zaradi suma nezakonitega pridobivanja dovoljenj za tabor v Tisnu.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku so predstavljene dejanske informacije o aretacijah in sodnih postopkih, ne da bi se očitno naklonil nobeni politični strani. Poroča o dejanjih več posameznikov - nekdanjih športnikov, uradnikov in poslovnežev - ne da bi zavzeli jasen ideološki stališč.
Zakaj dejstva (87): This article confirms the arrests and the charges against Šimić, Livljanić, and Mikšić, matching the primary source. It adds context about the previous legal actions and the potential implications of the current investigation, which is consistent with the primary source.
Zakaj objektivnost (83): The article presents the information objectively, though there is a slight emphasis on the political implications of the arrests, particularly regarding Marin Mikšić's position within HSS.
Hrvaška protikorupcijska agencija USKOK je razširila svojo preiskavo o domnevni korupciji v zvezi s prodajo zemljišč v Istri. Preiskava zdaj vključuje pet dodatnih posameznikov in eno pravno osebo, vključno s hrvaškimi in slovenskimi državljani, ki so osumljeni zlorabe položaja, sprejemanja podkupnin in razkritja zaupnih informacij iz kazenskih postopkov. Po navedbah USKOK je nekdanji uslužbenec in poznejši vodja Urada za urbanizem in občinsko lastnino v mestu Buzet domnevno uporabil svoj položaj med koncem leta 2012 in 11. marcem 2025, da bi zainteresiranim kupcem občinske in državne zemljišča zagotovil privilegiran dostop do informacij o razpisih in dokumentaciji. V zameno je osumljena, da je prejela denar, vključno z vsaj 4.000 evri od slovenskega državljana v enem primeru. Poleg tega USKOK sumi, da je župan Buzet, Fabrizio Vižintin, skupaj z direktorjem podjetja, ki je sodelovala pri razdelitvijanju mesta z odprtimi postopki javnih naročil, medtem ko je ta družba umetno ustvarila dobiček v vrednosti najmanj 163,86 milijonov evrov.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku so predstavljene dejanske obtožbe USKOK, nacionalnega protikorupcijskega organa, ne da bi očitno naklonil nobeni strani. Poroča o tekočih preiskavah, ki vključujejo javne uslužbence in morebitno zlorabo moči, vendar ne vključuje pristranskega jezika, selektivnega pridobivanja virov ali uredništva.
Zakaj dejstva (86): This article confirms the arrests and the charges against Šimić, Livljanić, and Mikšić, matching the primary source. It also includes details about the illegal permits and the potential financial implications, which are consistent with the primary source.
Zakaj objektivnost (82): The tone is neutral, though there is a slight emphasis on the legal consequences and the potential impact on the individuals involved, which could be seen as slightly biased.
V Rijeci sta bila v okviru velike operacije državne varnostne službe (USKOK) aretirana županja Buje Fabrizio Vižintin in direktor gradbene družbe Mersudin Keranović. Aretacije so povezane z obtožbami o korupciji, zlasti z zlorabo zemljišč in morebitnim finančnim prekrškom. Preiskava je, kot se zdi, razširitev prejšnje preiskave, ki je bila usmerjena proti nekdanji mestni vodji Jeleni Perossa, ki je bila aretirana lani pod podobnimi sumami.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja aretacije in povezane obtožbe, ne da bi očitno naklonil nobeni strani.
Zakaj dejstva (85): The article accurately reports the arrests of Šimić, Livljanić, and Mikšić, aligning with the primary source. It includes specific details such as the location of the camp, the legal violations, and the prior history of Livljanić being arrested. It also references the police and USKOK actions, maint
Zakaj objektivnost (82): The tone remains neutral, focusing on the facts of the case without introducing personal opinions or emotional language. It presents the events in a straightforward manner, suitable for a news report.
Dario Šimić, nekdanji hrvatski nogometni reprezentativac, je utorak bio dovezen na ispitivanje u zagrebačkom sjedištu USKOK-a po tem, ko je bil aretiran v okviru antikorupcijske akcije. Šimić je među tri osumljence, katerim preiskovalci povezujejo sumnje u nezakonito ishođenje dozvola za kamp u Tisnom. Uhićena je i Neda Livljanić, bivša voditeljica Odjela za turizam pri Službi za gospodarstvo i imovinskopravne poslove nekadašnjeg Ureda državne uprave Šibensko-kninske županije, kateri se sumnja da je omogočila Šimi potrebniku pristupnim dovoljenjem. Treći aretirani je Marinšić, vodi poduzetnik i član HSS proces-a luka, ki se smatra posrednikom pri pribavljanju dokumentacije.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članci opisuju antikorupcijsku akciju i učešće političara, ali ne prikazujejo jasnu stranku pozicijo. Prikazuje se objektivna situacija brez očitnega slanja na levo ali desno stran. Istraživačka agencija USKOK je nevtralna institucija, in vsak učitelj je prikazan kot del procesa. Nema jasno z
Zakaj dejstva (85): The article accurately reports the arrest of Dario Šimić and others, citing the primary source document. It mentions the involvement of Neda Livljanić and Marin Mikšić, aligning with the primary source. However, it lacks specific details from the primary source regarding the exact nature of the corr
Zakaj objektivnost (80): The tone remains neutral, presenting facts without overt bias. The article avoids taking sides but does emphasize the seriousness of the situation through the mention of the investigation and potential legal consequences.
Dario Šimić, nekdanji hrvaški nogometni reprezentativnik, je bil obtožen izdajanja nezakonitih rešitev za kampove, kar je rezultat raziskav USKOK iz leta 2025. Optužena je več oseb, vključno z investitorjem kampa Z Priza, lastnikom ilegalnega kluba Daria, lokalnim gostiteljem kampa Borisa Kulušića.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja dejanske podatke o sodnih postopkih, ki vključujejo posameznike, povezane z nedovoljenimi dovoljenji za kampiranje, ne da bi očitno zagovarjali katero koli politično stran, poroča o dejanjih več posameznikov, vključno z nekdanjimi uradniki in podjetniki, ne da bi zavzeli jasno stališče.
Zakaj dejstva (85): The article accurately reports the arrest of Dario Šimić and Marin Mikšić, aligning with the primary source document. It mentions the involvement of Neda Livljanić and the charges related to illegal permits for the camp in Tisno. However, it lacks specific details from the primary source about the r
Zakaj objektivnost (80): The tone remains neutral, focusing on the facts of the arrests and legal proceedings. There is some emotional language when describing the police action, but overall the reporting is balanced.
Članek poroča o pravni preiskavi, ki jo je začela Hrvaška protikorupcijska agencija (USKOK) zaradi obtožb o korupciji, v katere je bilo vključenih šest posameznikov in štiri pravne osebe, povezane z nepremičninskimi transakcijami v Istriji. Preiskava se osredotoča na obtožbe, da je občinska uslužbenka, ki je kasneje služila kot vodja Urada za urbani načrtovanje v Buzi, z uporabo svojih pooblastil in dostopa do dokumentov nepravilno olajšala prodajo in najem nepremičnin v korist zainteresiranih strank.
Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): V članku so dejanja obtoženih označena kot koruptivna in neetična, poudarjena pa je njihova zloraba moči in vpliva za osebno pridobitev.
Zakaj dejstva (85): The article discusses the expansion of the corruption investigation in Istria, referencing the primary source document about the illegal permits and the roles of the suspects. It provides additional context about the broader corruption network, which is aligned with the primary source.
Zakaj objektivnost (80): While the article is mostly factual, it has a somewhat sensational tone when discussing the expanded investigation, which might influence readers' perceptions of the severity of the case.
V novi operaciji Hrvaške obveščevalne službe (USKOK) so aretirali nekdanjega nogometaša Darija Šimića in nekdanjo vodjo turističnega oddelka Šibenik-Kninskega okrožnega sveta Nedo Livljanić. Šimić naj bi nezakonito dobil potrebna dovoljenja za kamp v Tisnu na zemljišču, ki ni bilo namenjeno gradnji. Šimić je bil zaslišan, vendar ni bil uradno pridržan. Njegov odvetnik je trdil, da glede na Šimićin profil ni prostora za preiskovalno pridržanje.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja uravnotežen opis pravnih postopkov, ki vključujejo Šimića in Livljanića, vključno z stališči odvetnikov obrambe in lokalnih prebivalcev.
Zakaj dejstva (82): The article accurately describes the arrests and the legal basis for the investigation, including the role of Neda Livljanić and Marin Mikšić. It cites the primary source document and includes additional context about the camp’s location and legal status, which supports the factual claims.
Zakaj objektivnost (80): The tone remains largely neutral, although there is a brief mention of public reactions and media coverage, which may suggest a mild editorial perspective. However, it does not strongly influence the overall neutrality of the report.
V Splitu so aretirali dva osumljenca korupcije, vključno s policistom, ki je bil obtožen, da je izpustil občutljive podatke članom narkotične tolpe, ki jo je vodil Marko Benzon. Zadeva je bila odkrita z analizo šifriranih komunikacij prek aplikacije SKY, kjer je policist domnevno poročal o registraciji vozil preprodajalcem drog. Hrvaška obveščevalna služba (USKOK) je začela preiskavo proti tremi hrvaškim državljanom zaradi domnevne zlorabe položaja in spodbujanja take zlorabe. Eden od osumljencev je policist, ki je med letnim dopustom dostopal do podatkovne zbirke Ministrstva za notranje zadeve, da bi preveril, ali zadevna vozila pripadajo policistom. Te informacije so se delili med osumljenci, kar je privedlo do nadaljnjih preiskav.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja dejanske podatke o preiskavi korupcije, ki vključuje organi kazenskega pregona in organizirani kriminal, ne da bi očitno zagovarjal katero koli politično ideologijo.
Zakaj dejstva (82): The article continues the discussion of the unrelated police officer case, again diverting attention from the main event. It provides some details about the charges against the police officer, but this is not aligned with the primary source document.
Zakaj objektivnost (78): The article shows a clear bias towards the police officer case, using emotionally charged language to describe the alleged corruption, which detracts from the neutrality required for the main event.
V protikorupcijski operaciji, ki sta jo izvedla policija in enota Uskoks, so aretirali nekdanjega nogometaša Darija Šimića, Nedo Livljanića in Marina Mikšića. Aretacije so povezane z sumom na nezakonito izdajo dovoljenj za Šimičev kamp v Tisnu. Kamp, ki se nahaja na 10 parcelah, v katerih bi lahko nastanilo 30 ljudi, je bil domnevno zgrajen v nasprotju z uredbami o zaščitenih obalnih območjih. Mikšić je osumljen, da je olajšal nezakonito pridobitev dokumentov za kamp, Livljanić pa je obtožen, da je izdal odločitve, ki dovoljujejo gostoljubne storitve v zasebni rezidenci, kljub temu, da zemljišče ne izpolnjuje prostorskih zahtev. Livljanić se je prej soočala z nezakonitimi obtožbami v zvezi z taborišči in je bila vpletena v škandal, ki je vključeval poslovneža Zorana Pripuza.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku so predstavljene dejanske informacije o aretacijah posameznikov, povezanih z nezakonitimi operacijami v taboriščih, ne da bi se očitno naklonil nobeni politični skupini.
Zakaj dejstva (80): This article aligns well with the primary source, providing details about the arrests and the charges against Šimić, Livljanić, and Mikšić. It includes quotes from lawyers and local officials, which match the information in the primary source. It also mentions the previous legal actions against Livl
Zakaj objektivnost (78): The tone is generally neutral, though there is a slight emphasis on the legal consequences and public reaction, which could be seen as a minor editorial tilt. However, it does not clearly favor any party in the case.
Hrvaška obveščevalna agencija USKOK je razširila preiskavo proti županu Buzeta, Fabriziu Vizintinu, skupaj z dvema slovenskima državljanoma in gradbenim podjetjem, zaradi obtožb korupcije, manipulacije z ponudbami in pranja denarja. Preiskava kaže, da je župan morda dodelil pogodbe v vrednosti 3,86 milijona evrov gradbenemu podjetju, ki je zaslužilo približno 1,16 milijona evrov, medtem ko je župan prejel več kot 20.000 evrov podkupnin. Poleg tega je bivša županka Jelena Perossa obtožena, da je olajšala nakup in najem občinske zemljišča Slovencem in prejela vsaj 4.350 evrov podkupnin. Župan tudi sumi, da je podjetje, ki je v lasti nekdanjega župana, nezakonito plačalo 39.035 evrov za prevode, vključene v opis ponudb podjetja, in razkrilo zaupne informacije iz USKOK.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja dejanske obtožbe iz preiskave USKOK, ne da bi javno podprl kakršno koli politično stališče. Poroča o pravnih obtožbah in morebitnih kršitvah, ne da bi se postavil na katero stran ali uporabil čustveno nabito jezik.
Zakaj dejstva (80): The article aligns with the primary source by discussing the same case involving Šimić and the alleged misuse of authority. It provides detailed financial figures and procedural steps, matching the primary source's content. It also mentions the potential for investigative detention, as stated in the
Zakaj objektivnost (78): The tone remains neutral, though there is some emphasis on the severity of the allegations, particularly around financial misconduct. It presents the facts without overtly taking a position on the guilt or innocence of the parties involved.
Nekdanji hrvaški nogometaš Dario Šimić je bil aretiran s strani Hrvaške obveščevalne službe (USKOK) in policije v Zagrebu in odvzet na zaslišanje. V priporu je bil skupaj z nekdanjo občinsko zaposlenko Nedo Livljanić in podjetnikom Marinom Mikšićem, ki je osumljen posredovanja. Preiskava se osredotoča na obtožbe, da je Šimić prek Livljanića nezakonito dobil potrebna dovoljenja za svoj tabor v Tisnu. Vendar pa je bilo nekaj ur po aretaciji objavljeno, da USKOK ne bo zahteval preiskovalnega pridržanja za Šimića, kar pomeni, da bo izpuščen. Šimić se šteje za sekundarnega obtoženca v tem primeru. USKOK je sprožil preiskavo proti trem hrvaškim državljanom zaradi sumov zlorabe položaja in vpliva, vendar ni zahteval preiskovalnega pridržanja zaradi pomanjkanja podlage.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja dejanske informacije o sodnih postopkih, ki vključujejo posameznike, povezane z lokalnim upravljanjem in ureditvijo.
Zakaj dejstva (80): The article provides accurate information about the investigation into Šimić’s camp permit, including the legal procedures and the roles of the individuals involved. It references the primary source and adds context about the legal framework, making it factually sound.
Zakaj objektivnost (75): There is a slight editorial lean towards emphasizing the legal consequences and the seriousness of the allegations, which could be interpreted as a subtle bias. However, it still maintains a relatively neutral tone overall.
V policijski operaciji, ki jo je vodila hrvaška obveščevalna služba (USKOK), so aretirali nekdanjega nogometaša Darija Šimića in nekdanjo vodjo turistične pisarne v Šibeniku Nedo Livljanić. V operaciji je bila tudi Marina Mikšić, znana lokalna političarka in članica vladajoče koalicije v okrožju Šibensko-Knin.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku so predstavljene informacije o aretacijah in obtožbah proti Mariini Mikšić, ne da bi se odkrito podpiralo ali obsodilo kakršno koli politično stališče.
Zakaj dejstva (80): This article shifts focus to another unrelated case involving a police officer and a criminal gang, which diverges from the main event described in the primary source. While it does mention the arrests of Šimić, Livljanić, and Mikšić, the majority of the content is about a different investigation.
Zakaj objektivnost (75): The tone becomes more sensational and less focused on the main event, suggesting a possible bias towards emphasizing the broader scope of USKOK's operations.
Hrvaška protikorupcijska agencija USKOK je objavila nove podrobnosti v zvezi s preiskavo župana Buja Ivana Vižintina in njegove domnevne vpletene v korupcijo. Preiskava kaže, da se je Vižintin med letoma 2017 in julijem 2026 dogovoril s Keranovičem, da bi zagotovil gradbene in trgovinske pogodbe za Keranovićevo podjetje Metior Gradnja, tako da je velike naročila razdelil na manjše, ki so pod zakonskimi pragovi preglednosti. To je Metior Gradnji omogočilo, da je prejel naročila v vrednosti vsaj 3,86 milijona evrov in pridobil nezakonite dobičke v višini vsaj 1,16 milijona evrov s pretiranjem in ponavljajočim se obračunom. Poleg tega je Vižintin domnevno zahteval, da Keranović plača posameznikom, povezanim z njim, v skupni vrednosti vsaj 681 evrov, da bi zagotovil nadaljnji tok pogodb. Preiskava vključuje tudi nekdanjo mestno sekretarko Jeleno Perossi, ki naj bi kljub morebitnim pogodbam o prevodnih storitvah za mestno osebje, ki zahtevajo dvojezično osebje, uporabljala s Keranoviča Keranoviča, kljub morebitnim prevodom, ki je prejelo še €39,035,96 evrov.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku so predstavljene dejanske obtožbe, ki jih je agencija za boj proti korupciji USKOK vložila zoper lokalnega župana in druge uradnike.
Zakaj dejstva (75): This article continues the coverage of the broader corruption case in Bujam, but again focuses less on the specific case involving Šimić. While it mentions the names of those arrested, it provides less direct connection to the primary source, which centers on Šimić’s camp permit issue.
Zakaj objektivnost (70): The article has a more narrative tone, suggesting a possible editorial angle when discussing the implications of the arrests. It leans slightly toward highlighting the complexity of the case, potentially influencing reader perception.
Policaj, ki dela za Ministrstvo za notranje zadeve (MUP) na Hrvaškem, je pod preiskavo Državnega pravosodnega nadzornika (USKOK) zaradi domnevne zlorabe svojega položaja za dostop do zaupnih podatkov o lastnikih avtomobilov med 3. in 6. februarjem 2021 v Splitu. Policaj naj bi imel dostop do teh informacij med letnim dopustom in jih posredoval drugemu posamezniku, ki jih je nato posredoval tretji osebi, ki je sumljiva v vpletenost v trgovino z mamili. Zadeva je povezana s kriminalno skupino, ki naj bi jo vodil nekdanji svetovni prvak v kickboxingu Marko Benzon, ki je bil aretiran aprila prejšnjega leta v zvezi s tihotapljenjem in distribucijo drog. USKOK je priporočil preiskovalno pridržanje za enega osumljenca in prepoved poslovnih dejavnosti za drugega.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku so predstavljene dejanske podrobnosti o tekoči preiskavi, ki vključuje domnevno zlorabo pooblastil znotraj MUP, ne da bi očitno naklonjena kateri koli strani.
Zakaj dejstva (75): The article discusses a police investigation into a police officer leaking data to a criminal group, but it does not mention the primary source document's details about Dario Šimić, Marin Mikšić, or the connection to the tourism department. The facts presented are plausible but lack direct alignment
Zakaj objektivnost (60): The article uses emotionally charged terms like 'skandal' and 'narko-klan,' suggesting bias against the police and the accused. It frames the situation as a clear-cut case of corruption without presenting counterarguments or additional context.
Članek poroča o kazenskih preiskavah, ki jih je začela hrvaška obveščevalna služba (USKOK) proti tremi posameznikom, vključno s policistom, obtoženim, da je izpustil zaupne podatke iz Ministrstva za notranje zadeve (MUP) članom narkotične tolpe iz Splita. Preiskava kaže, da je policist, ki je bil star 44 let, odgovoril na zahtevo svojega 44-letnega bratranca, da preveri evidence o lastništvu vozil v podatkovni zbirki MUP. Ta zahtevek naj bi izhajal od 41-letnega moškega, ki je želel ugotoviti, ali so določena vozila uporabljali policisti, ki spremljajo posameznike, povezane s trgovino z mamili. Trdi se, da je policist, kljub temu, da je vedel, da so takšni podatki omejeni, dostopal do informacij med letnim dopustom in jih delil s svojim bratrancem, ki jih je nato posredoval 41-letniku.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja uravnotežen opis pravnih postopkov, ki vključujejo kazenske organe in organizirani kriminal, ne da bi se odkrito naklonil nobeni politični ideologiji.
Zakaj dejstva (70): The article covers the police investigation into leaking data but omits specific details from the primary source such as Dario Šimić and Marin Mikšić. While it aligns with general themes of corruption, it lacks precise references to the events described in the primary source.
Zakaj objektivnost (65): The article maintains a relatively neutral tone but still leans toward portraying the police officer negatively without providing balanced perspectives or alternative viewpoints.
★
Ohranimo novice poštene.
ObjectiveNews financirajo bralci in je brez oglasov – pristranskost vam pokažemo, ne skrijemo. Podprite neodvisno novinarstvo za 5 €/mesec.
Croatia
