Vrhovno sodišče ZDA je sprejelo primer ortodoksnega judovskega moškega iz Ohia, ki mu je bilo prepovedano voditi domačo molitveno službo, znano kot *minyan.* Ta odločitev je pomemben korak v pravni bitki, ki traja že več kot pet let in se dotika vprašanj verske svobode, zakonov o razdelitvi območij in ustavnih pravic.
Daniel Grand, pravoslavni Jud, ki prebiva v University Heightsu v Ohiu, je začel spor januarja 2021, ko je povabil skupino desetih moških v svoj dom, da bi oblikovali *minyan*, ki ga zahteva judovski zakon za določene skupinske molitve.
Stanje se je poslabšalo, ko je eden od Grandovih sosedov izrazil zaskrbljenost zaradi uporabe njegovega doma za versko zbiranje. V odgovoru je mesto University Heights izdalo ukaz o prenehanju, ki je trdil, da je uporaba stanovanjske nepremičnine za verska srečanja kršila lokalne predpise o razdelitvi.
Leta 2022 je Grand vložil sodni postopek, v katerem je izpodbijal dejanja mesta na podlagi prvega amandmaja in zakona o uporabi verskih zemljišč in institucionaliziranih oseb (RLUIPA).
Podpora za Grandin vzrok je bistveno narasla po vložitvi devetih amicus curiae briefov, med njimi enega, ki ga je predložil Nacionalni judovski zagovorniški center.
Zavezništvo za obrambo svobode (ADF) je združilo moči z odvetniško pisarno Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, da bi zastopalo Grand.
Odločitev vrhovnega sodišča, ki je sprejela zadevo, zdaj znano kot Grand v. University Heights, je znak, da bo zadeva obravnavana v prihodnjem mandatu.
2 poročil
The Jerusalem PostNeodvisenDesnovčerajThe U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to hear the case of Daniel Grand, an Orthodox Jewish man in Ohio, who was prohibited by his city from hosting home prayer services known as a minyan. Grand, unable to travel to a synagogue due to Sabbath restrictions, modified his home to accommodate these gatherings. His neighbors reported him, leading to a cease-and-desist order and increased surveillance. After initial rejections from lower courts, Grand appealed to the Supreme Court, supported by multiple amicus briefs highlighting concerns over religious freedom. Legal groups like Alliance Defending Freedom argue that such actions threaten constitutional rights and could impact similar gatherings nationwide.
Ocena pristranskosti (Desno): The article frames the issue through the lens of religious freedom and constitutional rights, emphasizing the threat posed by local government actions. It highlights legal advocacy groups with conservative leanings, such as Alliance Defending Freedom, and portrays the city's actions as overly broad.
HaaretzNeodvisen🔒Sredinapred 3 dneviThe Attorney General of Israel informed the Supreme Court that only 16 Haredi individuals were arrested for draft evasion during the current year. The statement highlights the low number of arrests compared to previous years, suggesting a possible decline in enforcement efforts against religiously motivated draft avoidance among ultra-Orthodox communities. This issue remains contentious due to the tension between national security concerns and religious freedoms. The legal proceedings involve discussions around the state's authority to enforce conscription laws and the rights of religious minorities.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): The article presents factual information regarding the number of arrests without overtly favoring any particular political stance. It reports on a legal matter involving the state's actions and the response from the judiciary, maintaining a balanced tone by focusing on the data provided by the AG. S
★
Ohranimo novice poštene.
ObjectiveNews financirajo bralci in je brez oglasov – pristranskost vam pokažemo, ne skrijemo. Podprite neodvisno novinarstvo za 5 €/mesec.
Postani podpornik
IL
